printer friendly version
TV stations challenged on use of 'Redskins' name
Friday, July 22, 2005
The four largest television stations in the Washington, D.C., area have been warned not to use the name "Redskin" in their stories, The Washington Post reports.
George Washington University professor John Banzhaf [
Web Site] said he will challenge the stations' broadcast licenses for using the word.
He cited a recent appeals court decision reviving a lawsuit over the team's trademarks.
Activist Suzan Shown Harjo and six other Native Americans want the marks canceled.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 15 said plaintiff Mateo Romero, from Cochiti Pueblo in New Mexico, should be allowed to pursue his claims against the Redskins team.
Get the Story:
Redskins' Taylor Will Be in Camp [second half of story]
(the Washington Post 7/22)
Username:
indianz@indianz.com, Password:
indianz
Appeals Court Decision:
Pro-Football,
Inc. v. Harjo (July 15, 2005)
Lower Court Decision:
Pro-Football,
Inc. v. Harjo (September 30, 2003)
Patent and Trademark Office Ruling:
Trademark
Trial and Appeal Board (1999)
Relevant Links:
Redskins -
http://www.redskins.com
Related Stories:
'Redskins' lawsuit revived by appeals court
(7/18)
Opinion: It's time
for racist mascots to go (07/14)
Seminole Tribe doesn't have problem with
mascots (07/05)
Harjo: Ruling expected
any day on use of R-word (06/17)
Harjo:
NCAA should ban all 'Native' imagery (05/27)
Appeals court enters battle over 'Redskins' names
(4/11)
Letter: Redskins owner should
drop offensive name (11/11)
Column: It's
time for 'Redskins' to go (09/22)
Opinion: Redskins should drop 'offensive' name
(01/07)
Seneca Nation invited lawmakers
to Redskins game (10/13)
Opinion:
Fight against Redskins marks a waste of time (10/07)
NCAI critical of ruling on Redskins trademarks
(10/3)
Judge allows team to keep
Redskins names (10/2)
Court
considers cancellation of Redskins team marks (07/24)
Report: Redskins merchandise worth $5
million (07/24)
Judge to
hold hearing on Redskins mark case (7/21)
Opinion: Take Indians out of
Redskins (12/02)
On
Mascots: 'Redskins' is our n-word (09/16)
White Man: Indians proud of
Redskins (5/30)
Opinion:
Why Redskins must change (3/4)
Redskins get 'new' old look
(2/7)
Redskins uniforms
changed, for now (2/6)
Harjo:
Seeking 'honor' in R-word (2/4)
Opinion: Redskins is for
Indians (1/28)
Letters: More
on Redskins name (1/18)
Redskins name OK if it offends
(1/17)
As If: Replace
Redskins logo (1/15)
Editorial: Redskins honors Native
people (1/14)
Letters:
Debate over Redskins name (1/14)
Redskins name called 'dehumanizing'
(1/10)
Redskins told to
pick new name (1/9)
Letter:
'Redskins' honors Native people (1/9)
Opinion: War over Redskins plate
(1/7)
Redskins name
wanted changed (11/19)
Copyright © 2000-2005 Indianz.Com
