indianz.com your internet resource indianz.com on facebook indianz.com on twitter indianz.com on Google+ indianz.com on soundcloud
phone: 202 630 8439
The University of Tulsa College of Law - Master's in Indian Law
Advertise on Indianz.Com
Home > News > Headlines
Print   Subscribe
Appeals court hears land-into-trust dispute
Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Congress has created different categories of tribes, some with the right to acquire new trust lands and others without, lawyers from the state of Rhode Island told a federal appeals court on Tuesday.

Tribes in Western states fall into the first category because they were federally recognized when the Indian Reorganization Act was passed in 1934, the court was told. That means they can follow the land-into-trust process that was created by the law, the attorneys said.

"The IRA was designed to eliminate the allotment policy," Joseph S. Larisa Jr., a lawyer for the town of Charlestown, told the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals. The land-into-trust process helps Western tribes recover their lost acreage, he said.

But others fall into a different category, the attorneys argued. By settling a land claim for an 1,800-acre reservation, the Narragansett Tribe gave up its right to acquire any new trust properties, they said.

"The experience in Rhode Island is significantly different from the Western states," assistant attorney general Neal Kelly said. "We believe the land in Rhode Island is very different from other land in the United States."

That sweeping characterization kept six judges of the court occupied during a 90-minute hearing in Boston, Massachusetts, yesterday afternoon. They tried to decide whether the use of the word "now" in the IRA prevents tribes who weren't recognized in 1934 from following the land-into-trust process.

The IRA's definition of Indian includes the phrase "any recognized Indian tribe now under federal jurisdiction." "By anchoring the date of 1934, you are arguing that Congress created two categories of tribes?" asked Judge Juan R. Torruella.

Yes, replied Larisa, who said the Interior Department cannot take land into trust for tribes that weren't recognized or weren't under federal supervision as of that date. "This tribe is not a tribe under the 1934 Indian Reorganization Act," he said in reference to the Narragansetts.

That statement drew objections from Elizabeth Peterson, a government attorney who is representing Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne in the case. She said the Interior Department has never interpreted the word "now" to prevent tribes who were recognized after 1934 from acquiring trust lands.

Ian Gershengorn, a Washington, D.C., attorney who represents the National Congress of American Indians and dozens of other tribes as friends of the court, said it was "absurd" to argue that newly recognized tribes can't benefit from the land-into-trust process. "It makes a mockery of the whole acknowledgment process that the tribes have gone through," he said.

At least three of the judges on the court appeared to treat the state's argument with skepticism. They included Chief Judge Michael Boudin, who questioned why Congress would want to create different categories of tribes.

"If the Indians have title and there is no prohibition, then the federal government can take it into trust," said Boudin.

The tribe wants to use 31 acres in the town of Charlestown to build housing for low-income and elderly members. The land was purchased with Department of Housing and Urban Development funds and can only be used for that purpose.

But one judge said the state's real concerns had nothing to do with housing. "They're afraid of a casino or a smokeshop or something else like that," said Judge Sandra L. Lynch.

Under a different case that was resolved by the same six judges, the tribe was barred from operating a tax-free smokeshop on its settlement lands. By a 4-2 vote, the court said the tribe accepted state jurisdiction on the reservation as part of its "bargain" with Rhode Island. Torruella and Judge Kermit V. Lipez dissented.

Peterson acknowledged that state laws won't apply on the 31 acres because they are located outside the settlement reservation. "This tribe is entitled to recognition as a sovereign entity" and all the rights that go with it, she told the court.

"That completely erodes the bargain," responded Judge Bruce M. Selya, who appeared to be more sympathetic to the state.

Another member of the panel, Judge Jeffrey R. Howard, remained silent during the entire hearing. He previously authored a dissent that said state laws should apply on the newly acquired land.

The case began when the Bureau of Indian Affairs agreed to take the land into trust. In September 2003, a federal judge sided with the BIA and the tribe, a ruling that was upheld on appeal by a panel of three judges of the 1st Circuit in February 2005.

Unhappy with the outcome amid the battle over the tax-free cigarettes, the state asked for a rehearing. By a 2-1 vote, the three judges again sided with the BIA and the tribe, though Howard dissented in the September 2005 ruling.

Once again, the state sought a rehearing before an en banc panel of the court. The request went unanswered for nearly a year when the 1st Circuit last month suddenly scheduled oral arguments.

Whatever the outcome of the case, it is likely to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Last October, the justices refused to hear two similar land-into-trust disputes that originated in Western states.

All three cases involved a challenge to the constitutionality of the IRA. States have claimed the land-into-trust provisions are an illegal delegation of power to the Interior Department.

The Narragansett case is more complex due to the existence of a special act of Congress that settled the tribe's land claim. In the other two cases -- one from the 8th Circuit and the other from the 10th Circuit -- there were no other laws to reconcile and the tribes affected had been federally recognized as of 1934.

A similar case arose in the 2nd Circuit involving the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation. The court ruled there was no prohibition on new trust land acquisitions even though the tribe wasn't recently until 1984 and falls under a land claim settlement act.

Rhode Island says the Pequot case, and others like it, differ from the Narragansett one because Congress was more specific with respect to the lands that could be taken into trust. The state says Congress extinguished all forms of tribal rights when it settled the Narragansett claim.

1st Circuit Decision:
Carcieri v. Norton (September 13, 2005)

Earlier 1st Circuit Decision:
Carcieri v. Norton (February 9, 2005)

Relevant Documents:
Carcieri v. Norton Briefs, Opinions (NARF-NCAI Tribal Supreme Court Project

Relevant Laws:
Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act (US Code)

Relevant Links:
Narragansett Tribe - http://www.narragansett-tribe.org
Tribal Supreme Court Project - http://www.narf.org/sct/index.html

Related Stories:
Appeals court to hear land-into-trust case (1/8)
Appeals court to rehear land-into-trust dispute (12/07)
High court rejects state raid, land claim (11/28)
Supreme Court won't hear land-into-trust cases (10/3)
Court subjects Narragansett Tribe to all state laws (05/25)
Appeals court hears tribal-state sovereignty dispute (12/07)
Narragansett Tribe back in court over sovereignty (12/6)
Rhode Island set to appeal trust land decision (09/16)
Trust land challenge rejected by appeals court (9/14)
Appeals court agrees to rehear sovereignty case (07/11)
Tribal sovereignty must be respected, court rules (05/13)
Appeals court sides with tribe in trust land dispute (02/10)
Court won't rehear challenge to tribal land base (05/21)
Massachusetts court deals blow to tribe's sovereignty (12/10)
R.I. tribe takes smokeshop case to higher court (01/27)
R.I. to appeal Narragansett land-into-trust case (10/1)
Judge affirms Narragansett Tribe land-into-trust (9/30)
State's raid on tribal land sparks strong reactions (07/16)
Court says U.S. can protect tribe's interests (02/04)
Land still in limbo after decade-long fight (10/16)
The day the Supreme Court said no (10/16)

Copyright 2000-2006 Indianz.Com
More headlines...
Stay Connected:
On Facebook

On Twitter

On Google+

On SoundCloud
Local Links:
Federal Register | Indian Gaming | Jobs & Notices | In The Hoop | Message Board
Latest News:
Study confirms high rate of violence against Native women and men (5/5)
Senate Committee on Indian Affairs schedules meeting and hearing (5/5)
Native Sun News: Group aims to bring positive change to Rapid City (5/5)
Lakota Country Times: Rosebud Sioux Tribe updates education code (5/5)
Mark Trahant: Native candidates being left behind in big money race (5/5)
Brandon Ecoffey: Governor's comments harken back to painful era (5/5)
Ivan Star Comes Out: White domination in America is under threat (5/5)
Jennifer Denetdale: Navajo Nation panel examines gender violence (5/5)
Leader of Navajo Nation Council criticizes coverage of girl's death (5/5)
Sen. Rounds to seek system-wide review of Indian Health Service (5/5)
Elouise Cobell being considered for Presidential Medal of Freedom (5/5)
Nottawaseppi Huron Band to prosecute non-Indians under VAWA (5/5)
Gathering of Nations must find new venue after end of agreement (5/5)
Brothers awarded $450K for anti-Indian beating at New Mexico bar (5/5)
Eastern Shoshone Tribe pays $1.7M to acquire land on reservation (5/5)
Nambe Pueblo pays off remaining funds owed to gaming developer (5/5)
States with less Indian gaming presence rank higher for addictions (5/5)
Cowlitz Tribe hosts forums on casino construction and related work (5/5)
Editorial: New commercial casino won't hurt St. Regis Mohawk Tribe (5/5)
Navajo Nation reeling after arrest made in 11-year-old girl's death (5/4)
Bureau of Indian Affairs adds names to memorial for fallen officers (5/4)
Bureau of Indian Affairs updates list of federally recognized tribes (5/4)
Bureau of Indian Affairs finalizes rule for burial assistance program (5/4)
National Indian Gaming Commission selects first vice chair in years (5/4)
Lakota Country Times: Oglala Sioux Tribe assists vets with housing (5/4)
Native Sun News: Northern Cheyenne Tribe pushed to hold election (5/4)
Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribal Tribune: Tribes fight coal mine in Texas (5/4)
Jim Kent: Governor of South Dakota blissfully ignorant about tribes (5/4)
Ernestine Chasing Hawk: Who made the decision to kill Anna Mae? (5/4)
Suzan Shown Harjo: Delete 'off the reservation' from our discourse (5/4)
Simon Moya-Smith: Donald Trump sees Indian people going 'wild' (5/4)
Dina Gilio-Whitaker: Native issues are afterthought for candidates (5/4)
Blackfeet Nation to see $107M from Cobell land buy-back program (5/4)
Nooksack Tribe fires judge and loses attorney in enrollment crisis (5/4)
Democrat Bernie Sanders staying in race as last Republicans quit (5/4)
Choctaw Nation offered settlements in fatal casino bus accident (5/4)
Keweenaw Bay Indian Community fails to sell governor on casino (5/4)
Shakopee Tribe starts work on casino hotel and convention center (5/4)
Editorial: Work with Cloverdale Rancheria rather than fight casino (5/4)
Lakota Country Times: Governor lectures tribe about sacred lands (5/3)
Native Sun News: Navajo Nation chapter sues tribe over water deal (5/3)
Vi Waln: Rosebud Sioux Reservation plagued by abuse and assault (5/3)
James Giago Davies: Propaganda machine protects racist mascot (5/3)
Cronkite News: Sports teams turn to tribes for naming rights deals (5/3)
Steven Newcomb: Tricking the original nations into reconciliation (5/3)
Rosebud man selected as leader of South Dakota State University (5/3)
Klamath Tribes report results of election for leadership positions (5/3)
Leaders of Louisiana tribes in conflict over $48M relocation grant (5/3)
Choctaw Nation ordered to pay $11M for casino bus crash deaths (5/3)
Arizona reports 5.1 percent decline in casino revenue from tribes (5/3)
Timbisha Shoshone Tribe casino up for discussion at city meeting (5/3)
Schaghticoke Tribal Nation hoping to keep gaming lawsuit going (5/3)
Blackfeet Nation welcomes Interior Secretary Jewell to homeland (5/2)
Native Sun News: Family confronts man linked to woman's death (5/2)
Lakota Country Times: State shows cards in fight over sacred site (5/2)
Clara Caufield: Living in a state of emergency on my reservation (5/2)
Mark Trahant: Native newspapers and presidential endorsements (5/2)
more headlines...

Home | Arts & Entertainment | Business | Canada | Cobell Lawsuit | Education | Environment | Federal Recognition | Federal Register | Forum | Health | Humor | Indian Gaming | Indian Trust | Jack Abramoff Scandal | Jobs & Notices | Law | National | News | Opinion | Politics | Sports | Technology | World

Indianz.Com Terms of Service | Indianz.Com Privacy Policy
About Indianz.Com | Advertise on Indianz.Com

Indianz.Com is a product of Noble Savage Media, LLC and Ho-Chunk, Inc.