Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP
ads@blueearthmarketing.com   712.224.5420

Cobell
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about trust fund settlement


Elouise Cobell, the lead plaintiff in the Indian trust fund lawsuit, will be answering questions about the proposed settlement to the case. Cobell is a member of the Blackfeet Nation in Montana.

Dear Indian Country

This is the twelfth letter in a series of open letters that I’m sending to Indian Country. The purpose of this letter is to update you about the settlement and to answer your most relevant questions.

As I reported in the last letter, the House of Representatives voted to pass the “American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010” (“the Tax Extenders Bill”) before the Memorial Day holiday which included a provision authorizing the Cobell settlement. Unfortunately, on June 30, 2010, I learned our settlement would not be considered in a new version of the Senate Tax Extenders Bill. The new version failed to pass and the Senate could possibly consider it again in July. There is still a chance that we may be re-attached to that Bill, but the future of the Tax Extenders Bill is uncertain.

Following the failure of the Senate to pass the Tax Extenders Bill, our allies in the House of Representatives rallied to include our settlement on the war supplemental bill funding the Iraq and Afghanistan wars then being considered. This bill was passed by the House on the evening of July 1, 2010. The Senate did not consider the bill and is now on recess until Monday, July 12, 2010. We are urging our allies in the Senate to pass the war supplemental with the Cobell settlement.

The parties agreed to extend the settlement until July 9, 2010, so yet another extension is required if we are to give the Senate a chance to pass legislation. I will consult our attorneys and allies on the Hill about that extension over the next few days.

In your last letter, you mentioned that Senator Barrasso (R – WY), Vice-Chairman, Senator Committee on Indian Affairs introduced an amendment that he says would “improve” the settlement agreement even though it would terminate the settlement, what is the status of his amendment?
Thanks to your overwhelming support, Senator Barrasso was unable to bring his amendment to the floor for a vote. Your letters and calls to members of Congress had a significant impact on the outcome. Unfortunately, Senator Barrasso still doesn’t understand, or doesn’t care, that Indian Country overwhelmingly supports this settlement. According to statements reported in the press, he is more determined than ever to rob you of your victory in this case and it is likely that he again will attempt to introduce an amendment to terminate the settlement at some time in the future. We remain on guard against his efforts to further harm individual Indians.

You also mentioned that the National Congress of American Indians was considering a resolution supporting the Barrasso amendment, what is the status of that resolution?
I attended the NCAI event in Rapid City, South Dakota beginning June 20, 2010. A small, rabid group of tribal representatives sought to support Senator Barrasso’s amendment and, thereby, kill your settlement, but their effort was defeated soundly and NCAI passed a resolution urging Congress to reject the Barrasso amendment and pass authorizing legislation as soon as possible. It is important to remember that this class is made up solely of individual Indians trust beneficiaries; tribes have their own litigation (and, at times, the agenda of a few tribal leaders is inconsistent with individual Indians’ interests), but they don’t represent your interests in this litigation.

Will any Interior contractors with experience on Indian issues be selected to assist with the distribution of settlement proceeds or to hold the funds pending distribution?
Absolutely not. This is a conflict of interest. To allow the same contractors, who have been peddling their services that fail to deliver promised benefits to Indian Country, to have any role in the distribution of settlement funds would be insane. For the first time in history, your funds will be held securely, managed prudently, and distributed competently by able and experienced professionals. I know of no Interior contractors that meet the highest fiduciary standards that you are owed.

Where can I review the amount of time the attorneys have spent on the litigation?
Pursuant to an agreement between the parties, statements regarding counsels’ billing rates and related records supporting daily time, expense and cost records will be filed with the Court and available to the public. This documentation will be filed no later than 30 days following preliminary approval of the settlement agreement by the Court. Preliminary approval by the Court cannot occur unless and until Congress authorizes the settlement.

Prior Ask Elouise letters can be found on the settlement website: http://cobellsettlement.com/class/ask_elouise.php.

We also have a "frequently asked questions" section to answer the most common questions we've received: http://cobellsettlement.com/press/faq.php.

With so many members of the class, I can’t answer every question that you send. The Ask Elouise letters will answer as many questions as possible that are relevant to the entire class.

The most common question I receive every week relates to whether someone is included in this settlement. Unfortunately, I do not have that information. The settlement agreement provides general guidelines (see also http://cobellsettlement.com/press/faq.php), but I also understand that many of you have unique or unusual circumstances, which make it unclear to me whether you are included in the settlement class. For those of you who still have questions, I recommend that you register to receive all Court-ordered communications to ensure you do not miss important information. There is no need to register if you are receiving a quarterly IIM statement. The Court ultimately will determine who is included in this settlement. Registration information can be found at the end of this and every Ask Elouise letter.

If you are not currently receiving an IIM statement from the government, please remember to register for correspondence over the Internet or by calling the number below.

Internet: https://cert.tgcginc.com/iim/register.php
Telephone: 1-800-961-6109

If you have a question, send an e-mail to: askelouise@cobellsettlement.com. Otherwise you can send me a letter to the address below. To expedite the processing of your letters our contractor has set up a post office box in Ohio, but I assure you this letter is coming from me and I will see your letters.

Ask Elouise
Cobell Settlement
PO Box 9577
Dublin, OH 43017-4877

Thank you and keep your questions coming!

Cobell Settlement Documents:
Agreement | Press Release | Q&A | Audio

Related Stories:
CNC: Washington politics delaying passage of Cobell settlement (7/7)
Cobell Letter: Sen. Barrasso wrong over trust fund settlement (7/6)
Kimberly Craven: Obama not transparent on Cobell settlement (7/6)
Blog: Elouise Cobell never backed down from Indian trust fight (7/6)
House passes Cobell settlement under appropriations measure (7/2)
Editorial: Set aside partisan politics and pass Cobell settlement (7/2)
Cobell settlement in limbo after being removed from Senate bill (7/1)
Editorial: Partisan gridlock in Senate holds up Cobell settlement (7/1)
Sen. Barrasso: Trust fund settlement spends taxpayer dollars (6/30)
Editorial: Cobell settlement hits a partisan roadblock in Senate (6/29)
Supreme Court dismisses petition in Cobell accounting appeal (6/28)
Editorial: Barrasso should listen to tribes on Cobell settlement (6/28)
Senate Republicans block passage of bill with trust settlement (6/25)
Kevin Abourezk: NCAI passes resolution for Cobell settlement (6/24)
NCAI backs Cobell settlement, rejects Barrasso amendment (6/23)
Supreme Court to consider petition in Cobell trust fund case (6/23)
Turtle Talk: Trouble ahead if Supreme Court takes on Cobell? (6/23)
NCAI weighs position on amendment to trust fund settlement (6/22)
Sen. Barrasso hopes for vote on changes to Cobell settlement (6/21)
Wyoming tribes oppose amendment to trust fund settlement (6/18)
Editorial: Senate should approve Cobell trust fund settlement (6/18)
Tribes complain about NCAI letter on Cobell trust settlement (6/17)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about trust settlement (6/16)
Parties agree to extend deadline over trust fund settlement (6/16)
Official clarifies that NCAI 'firmly supports' Cobell settlement (6/15)
Blackfeet Nation slams NCAI over letter on Cobell settlement (6/15)
NCAI president writes letter on changes in Cobell settlement (6/14)
Opinion: Republican Senator threatens trust fund settlement (6/14)
Sen. Barrasso pushing amendment to trust fund settlement (6/11)
Obama administration against changes in Cobell settlement (6/10)
Bob Juneau: Pennies on the dollar for Cobell trust settlement (6/9)
New Cobell case judge backed Indian preference at Interior (6/7)
Opinion: Some justice for Indian Country in trust settlement (6/7)
Cobell suit handed to new judge after Robertson retirement (06/02)
Cobell speaks to graduates from Menominee Nation college (06/02)
Sen. Barrasso seeks to make changes to Cobell settlement (6/1)
Trust settlement awaits Senate action after House passage (6/1)
Editorial: Trust settlement is a victory for Native Americans (6/1)
Rep. Hastings loses bid to change terms of trust settlement (5/28)
Congress fails to meet deadline to act on Cobell settlement (5/28)
Editorial: Cobell settlement brings hope for Indian Country (5/26)
White House statement supports bill with trust settlement (5/25)
Votes expected this week on bill with trust fund settlement (5/25)
Five Civilized Freedmen seek a share of Cobell settlement (5/25)
Cobell trust fund settlement a part of jobs and tax measure (5/24)
Editorial: Indian Country deserves settlement to Cobell case (05/18)
White House press secretary mentions Cobell during briefing (05/18)
Rep. Hastings insists Congress not on 'deadline' over Cobell (5/14)
Kimberly Craven: Transparency needed for trust settlement (5/13)
Sen. Coburn blocks attempt to authorize Cobell settlement (5/10)
Angelique EagleWoman: Cobell deal bad for Indian Country (5/10)
Three weeks before end of last Cobell settlement deadline (5/7)
Cobell attorney says Congress can't change terms of deal (5/6)
Elouise Cobell answering questions about trust settlement (5/5)
Editorial: Congress must act quickly on Cobell settlement (5/4)
Cobell criticizes Sen. Barrasso for trying to 'kill' settlement (5/3)
Sen. Barrasso proposes changes to trust fund settlement (04/28)
Editorial: Justice delayed for Indian trust fund settlement (4/27)
House Speaker Pelosi backs settlement for Cobell case (4/26)
Clock ticking for Congress to approve Cobell settlement (4/26)
Harry Reid: Senate needs to act on trust fund settlement (4/23)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about trust settlement (4/21)
Rep. Rehberg pushes for action on trust fund settlement (4/16)
UKB chief hopes Congress acts on trust fund settlement (4/15)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about trust settlement (4/13)
Editorial: Not another 14 years for Indian trust fund case (4/12)
Judge in trust fund case worried about delays in settlement (4/9)
Judge urges Congress to approve settlement in Cobell case (4/8)
Cobell responds to questions about trust fund settlement (4/7)
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes back settlement to Cobell case (4/1)
Gyasi Ross: Cobell a hero and warrior for Indian Country (3/31)
Cobell discusses trust fund settlement at Yakama Nation (3/31)
Cobell to discuss settlement at conference in New Mexico (3/29)
Cobell team to discuss trust fund settlement in Wyoming (3/25)
Cobell responds to questions about trust fund settlement (3/24)
Cobell discusses settlement on Fort Belknap Reservation (3/24)
Cobell asks for support to approve trust fund settlement (3/23)
Cobell team heads to Idaho to talk trust fund settlement (3/23)
Cobell holds settlement meetings in Washington, Oregon (3/22)
Great Plains tribal leaders raise Cobell settlement issues (3/22)
Cobell settlement discussions in Montana, South Dakota (3/19)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about settlement (3/16)
Kimberly Craven: Cobell deal wrong for Indian Country (3/16)
Editorial: Congress must act soon on Cobell settlement (3/16)
Cobell team in Arizona, New Mexico to brief settlement (3/15)
Editorial: It's time to settle the Cobell trust fund lawsuit (3/15)
Editorial: It's time to settle the Cobell trust fund lawsuit (3/15)
South Dakota tribes weigh stance on Cobell settlement (3/11)
Audio: House Resources hearing on Cobell settlement (3/10)
Congress slow to move on Cobell trust fund settlement (3/10)
Witness list for House hearing on trust fund settlement (3/9)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about settlement (3/9)
Elouise Cobell to meet with landowners in South Dakota (3/5)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about settlement (3/2)
House Resources Committee schedules Cobell hearing (3/2)
Deadline in Cobell trust fund case extended to April 16 (3/1)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about settlement (2/22)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about settlement (2/17)
Opinion: Questions remain about Cobell settlement (2/9)
Opinion: Cobell case settled for pennies on the dollar (2/8)
Opinion: Cobell trust settlement addresses land issues (02/01)
Deadline approaches to approve trust fund settlement (02/01)
Dennis Gingold: The facts behind trust fund settlement (1/29)
Bill Martin: No rubber stamp for trust fund settlement (1/26)
Editorial: Congress must act fast on Cobell settlement (1/22)
Chickasaw firm secures land consolidation contract (1/21)
Opinion: Indian trust beneficiaries finally getting paid? (1/20)
Interview with Elliott Levitas, attorney for Cobell case (1/18)
Millions coming to Montana under Cobell settlement (01/07)
Congress gets more time to act on Cobell settlement (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell lawsuit (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell lawsuit (1/6)
Letters: A good settlement to Indian trust fund case (12/21)
Cobell urges Senate to move quickly on settlement (12/18)
Column: Free Indians of federal government control (12/18)
Column: Cobell deal not so great for Indian Country (12/18)
Editorial: Cobell deal corrects century-old old wrong (12/18)
Editorial: Settlement and accountability in trust fund (12/18)
Witness List: Senate hearing on Cobell settlement (12/16)
Mary Pember: The small picture of the Cobell deal (12/16)
Opinion: Deal won't change much in Indian Country (12/16)
Editorial: Settlement in Cobell case is long overdue (12/16)
Editorial: Act quickly to approve Cobell settlement (12/16)
Bill Means: Cobell settlement a rip-off for Indians (12/15)
Editorial: At last a settlement in Cobell trust case (12/15)
North Dakota tribes back settlement in Cobell case (12/14)
Opinion: Indian plaintiff won't see trust settlement (12/14)
Column: Navajo woman helped resolve Cobell case (12/14)
Editorial: Preventing future trust mismanagement (12/14)
Editorial: Approve settlement to Cobell trust case (12/14)
Senate committee sets Cobell settlement hearing (12/11)
Washington tribes react to Cobell case settlement (12/11)
Editorial: Land consolidation program 'worrisome' (12/11)
Lynne Harlan: A new era in federal Indian relations (12/11)
Column: Cowboy banks got paid more than Indians (12/11)
Editorial: Settling more than a century of injustice (12/11)
Editorial: Support settlement for Cobell trust case (12/11)
Editorial: Acknowledge past mistakes in trust fund (12/11)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell suit (12/11)
NARF welcomes settlement in Cobell trust lawsuit (12/10)
Cobell hailed as warrior as she returns to Montana (12/10)
Billings Paper: Cobell deal sends $27M to Montana (12/10)
Editorial: Cobell settlement fair for Indian Country (12/10)
Editorial: Welcome settlement to Cobell trust case (12/10)
Mostly praise for $3.4B settlement to Cobell lawsuit (12/9)
Editorial: Act quickly on Indian trust fund settlement (12/9)
Twitter Recap of Cobell settlement with Photos (12/8)
Statement by President Obama on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Dorgan on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. McCain on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Tester on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Rahall on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Cole and Rep. Kildee on Cobell settlement (12/8)
'Major' announcement on Indian trust management (12/8)