Law | National | Politics

Top GOP lawmaker doesn't think non-Indians will get fair trial






[YouTube: Sen. Grassley doesn't think Native Americans can hold fair trials]

The highest-ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee doesn't think non-Indians will get a fair trial in the tribal court system.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) was one of 22 Republicans who voted against S.47, a bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act. He explained his reasoning at a meeting with constituents in Iowa.

"[U]nder the laws of our land, you got to have a jury that is a reflection of society as a whole, and on an Indian reservation, it’s going to be made up of Indians, right? So the non-Indian doesn’t get a fair trial," Grassley said, according to a video posted by ThinkProgress, a liberal leaning site.

The tribal provisions of S.47 require non-Indian defendants to have ties to a tribal community and its members The bill also extends the protections of the U.S. Constitution to non-Indians.

Get the Story:
Top GOP Senator: Native American Juries Are Incapable Of Trying White People Fairly (ThinkProgress 2/21)
Chuck Grassley On VAWA: Tribal Provision Means 'The Non-Indian Doesn't Get A Fair Trial' (The Huffington Post 2/21)

Related Stories:
GOP lawmakers introduce Violence Against Indian Women Act (2/21)
Tribal jurisdiction provisions of VAWA face questions in House (2/20)
Editorial: Close tribal jurisdiction loophole with VAWA update (2/19)
Rep. Tom Cole defends tribal jurisdiction provisions in VAWA (2/18)
Editorial: Congress must renew Violence Against Women Act (2/18)
NCAI President Keel calls on Congress to protect Indian women (2/15)
PRI: Professor Sarah Deer discusses tribal jurisdiction in VAWA (2/15)
Republican blames VAWA vote on tribal jurisdiction provisions (2/14)
Opinion: Tribal jurisdiction provision violates U.S. Constitution (2/14)
Tribes hail passage of VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provision (2/13)
Senate keeps tribal jurisdiction provisions in VAWA measure (2/12)
Senate set for vote on VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provisions (2/11)
Editorial: Reauthorize VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provisions (2/11)
Column: Failing to respond to violence against Native women (2/11)
Senate rejects alternative to VAWA without tribal jurisdiction (2/8)
Senate set to vote on VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provision (2/7)
White House backs tribal jurisdiction provisions in VAWA bill (2/5)
Frontline: Closing a loophole in VAWA to help Native women (2/5)
Ryan Dreveskracht: Tribal provisions of VAWA up for debate (2/5)
Opinion: The Violence Against Women Act is on life support (01/28)
Matt Remle: Violence against women, violence against earth (1/25)
Haley Elkins: Media goes silent on the failure to pass VAWA (1/24)
NCAI calls on Congress to pass Violence Against Women Act (01/24)

Join the Conversation