NCAI denounces Sen. Grassley for 'fear mongering' on tribes
Monday, February 25, 2013
Filed Under:
Law
| National
| Politics
More on: 113th, chuck grassley, jurisdiction, ncai, republicans, senate, tribal courts, vawa
[YouTube: Sen. Grassley doesn't think Native Americans can hold fair trials]
The National Congress of American Indians denounced
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) for comments he made about tribal courts.
Sen. Chuck Grassley
(R-Iowa) was one of 22
Republicans who voted against S.47,
a bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act. He opposed provisions to recognize tribal jurisdiction over non-Indians who commit domestic violence offenses on reservations.
“Senator Grassley is wrong and it’s fear mongering at best. This video clearly shows the misinformed rhetoric and fear-based language being used by those who have an ill-conceived notion about the constitutionality of the tribal provisions, tribal courts, and the protections developed in VAWA to ensure victims and defendants are provided their constitutional rights," said NCAI Vice President Juana Majel-Dixon.
"No American, Native Americans included, in pursuit of delivering justice for all should ever be denigrated in this way, it’s inexcusable,” added Majel-Dixon, who also serves as co-chair of NCAI's Task Force on Violence Against Women.
Grassley is the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Four tribes are based in Iowa or have trust land in Iowa.
Get the Story:
Press Release: NCAI Responds to Senator Grassley’s Video Comments on VAWA Tribal Provisions – “Fear Mongering” Must End
(NCAI 2/22)
Related Stories: House to consider VAWA with different
jurisdiction provisions (2/25) Editorial: Congress must renew Violence Against
Women Act (2/25) Top GOP lawmaker doesn't
think non-Indians will get fair trial (2/22) GOP lawmakers introduce Violence Against Indian
Women Act (2/21) Tribal jurisdiction
provisions of VAWA face questions in House (2/20) Editorial: Close tribal jurisdiction loophole with
VAWA update (2/19) Rep. Tom Cole defends
tribal jurisdiction provisions in VAWA (2/18) Editorial: Congress must renew Violence Against
Women Act (2/18) NCAI President Keel
calls on Congress to protect Indian women (2/15) PRI: Professor Sarah Deer discusses tribal
jurisdiction in VAWA (2/15) Republican
blames VAWA vote on tribal jurisdiction provisions (2/14) Opinion: Tribal jurisdiction provision violates
U.S. Constitution (2/14) Tribes hail
passage of VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provision (2/13) Senate keeps tribal jurisdiction provisions in VAWA
measure (2/12) Senate set for vote on
VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provisions (2/11) Editorial: Reauthorize VAWA with tribal
jurisdiction provisions (2/11) Column:
Failing to respond to violence against Native women (2/11) Senate rejects alternative to VAWA without tribal
jurisdiction (2/8) Senate set to vote on
VAWA with tribal jurisdiction provision (2/7) White House backs tribal jurisdiction provisions in
VAWA bill (2/5) Frontline: Closing a
loophole in VAWA to help Native women (2/5) Ryan Dreveskracht: Tribal provisions of VAWA up for
debate (2/5) Opinion: The Violence
Against Women Act is on life support (01/28) Matt Remle: Violence against women, violence
against earth (1/25) Haley Elkins: Media
goes silent on the failure to pass VAWA (1/24) NCAI calls on Congress to pass Violence Against
Women Act (01/24)
|
Copyright © Indianz.Com
|
|
|