"2012 was a rough year for the Republican Party’s relationship with women. From Missouri Senate nominee Todd Akin’s “legitimate rape” comments to the party’s efforts to cut funding for preventative care (particularly important for women seeking cancer screenings and the like) to Rep. Darrell Issa’s all-male panel on contraception mandates and religious liberty — and the subsequent attacks from Rush Limbaugh and other right-wing voices on Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke, whom Issa had barred from the hearing — the GOP repeatedly showed a less-than-impressive concern for women’s rights. Not surprisingly, the 2012 presidential election saw the gender gap increase from 12 percentage points in 2008 to 18 percentage points, as President Obama maintained his support among women. One would think, then, that Republicans might pause before yet again insulting half of the country. But this week showed that House Republicans, at least, remain oblivious, as they let the landmark Violence Against Women Act expire.
First passed in 1994 (and drafted by then-Sen. Joe Biden), the Violence Against Women Act has helped law enforcement investigate and prosecute domestic and sexual abuse and increased the resources available to victims of those crimes. The bill was passed (and renewed in 2000 and 2005) with bipartisan support. This past April, the Senate passed the bill 68-31; though all 31 votes against were from Republicans, a number of very conservative senators supported the bill, including Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) and Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), who co-wrote the bill with liberal stalwart Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.).
But House Republicans objected to the reauthorization’s expanded protections for LGBT, illegal immigrant and Native American victims of sexual assault. That the GOP would prioritize discriminating against illegal immigrants and LGBT people over fighting domestic and sexual abuse is outrageous yet, sadly, not that surprising, given the power of anti-gay and anti-immigrant voices in the party. But perhaps even more damning is their opposition to the Native American protections. The expansion would give tribal courts jurisdiction over domestic violence committed by non-Native Americans against Native American women."
Get the Story:
James Downie: House Republicans remain determined to ignore women
(The Washington Post 1/3)
Related Stories:
Tribal provisions of Violence Against Women Act
die in House (1/3)
Feature: Native women fight
back against domestic violence (1/2)
Opinion: House GOP protects white men from tribal
prosecution (12/21)
Lise Balk King:
Indian women need protections with VAWA bill (12/19)
Anderson Law: Republican VAWA bill a deal breaker
for tribes (12/19)
Brian Paterson:
Indian women need protections from violence (12/14)
NCAI remains hopeful on legislation to protect
Indian women (12/13)
Salon: Abusers get
away with violence against Indian women (12/13)
Opinion: Native women still waiting on Congress to
take action (12/12)
Rep. Darrell Issa
introduces Violence Against Indian Women Act (12/4)
NCAI optimistic on a land-into-trust fix, VAWA
during lame-duck (11/09)
Join the Conversation
