The YST asks why I support the Chamberlain school system’s graduation ceremony decision. When I came to Wagner in 1976 as the new 7-12 principal, I initiated a program I called “Seventh Grade Orientation.” For 21 years, my opening comment alluded to all of the students as “Red Raiders.” All would be treated as equals with no regard for race or who one’s parents were. All issues would be consistent. On the street today, I often hear from former students, “Maybe I didn’t agree with you on something, but you always treated everyone the same way.” I take this as a compliment. Perhaps I was wrong, but that’s how I wanted it. No special treatment. That’s why I feel the way I do about Chamberlain’s graduation procedure. I don’t handle the special recognition of race as being an issue very well.Get the Story:
Roger Wiltz: Race should not mean specialized treatment (The MItchell Daily Republic 6/16)
Related Stories
Column: Reader defends exclusion of graduation
honor song (6/13) Yankton Sioux Tribe: Responding to recent opinions in paper (6/11)
Brandon Ecoffey: 'There is no such thing as half-way racists' (6/11)
Yankton Sioux Tribe: Responding to recent opinions in paper (6/11)
Editorial: Rejection of honor song stirred up racial tensions (5/27)
Column: Honor song debate shines light on race relations (5/22)
Drum group performs honor song after graduation ceremony (5/20)
Column: Denial of honor song another example of racial bias (5/20)
Crow Creek Sioux Tribe calls for boycott in honor song flap (5/17)
School board won't allow honor song at graduation ceremony (5/14)
Native Sun News: School balks at honor song for graduation (5/6)
Editorial: Allow honor song at school graduation ceremony (04/30)
Indian students push for honor song at graduation ceremony (04/25)
Join the Conversation
