Three generations of Houma women are seen in this undated photo. Photo from United Houma Nation
The Bureau of Indian Affairs is holding a series of public meetings and tribal consultations on proposed changes to the federal recognition process. The first meeting took place last week in Louisiana. Participants included the United Houma Nation, whose leaders hope the changes will reverse a negative preliminary decision on its petition. "Our people have been fighting this battle for a long time," Chief Thomas Dardar Jr. told The Wall Street Journal. The revisions to Part 83 would require tribes to provide documentation dating to 1934. Currently, petitioners have to go back to the date of first contact, a task that proves costly and difficult. The changes also allow previously denied groups to seek another shot at recognition. But the proposal requires the consent of all interested parties so some wouldn't be able to re-submit due to opposition from state governments and other tribes. The BIA's meetings continue through the end of the month. The public comment period ends August 1. Get the Story:
Tribes Seek Speedier Federal Recognition (The Wall Street Journal 7/11)
Choctaw-Apache faces leadership change, pushes for federal status (The Shreveport Times 7/11)
Vancleave Choctaws overcame discrimination, poverty (The Biloxi Sun Herald 7/11)
Native Americans celebrate tribal recognition with cucumbers (WLOX 7/11)
North Stonington official warns towns of tribal land claims (The New London Day 7/11) Federal Register Notice:
Federal Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes (May 29, 2014) Relevant Documents:
Proposed Rule | Press Release | Comparison Chart (comparing current rule to proposed rule) | Response to Comments on June 2013 Discussion Draft | Frequently Asked Questions
Related Stories
Radio: Chinook Nation
challenges federal recognition proposal (07/02)Chinook Nation preparing for another federal recognition battle (06/25)
Eastern Pequot Tribal Nation questions recognition provision (06/13)
Schaghticoke Tribal Nation opposes state veto on recognition (06/12)
Ruth Garby Torres: Truths about tribes and federal recognition (06/03)
Washington tribes could get another shot at federal recognition (06/02)
Comment period on BIA federal recognition closes on August 1 (05/29)
Editorial: Connecticut tribes deserve to be respected in state (5/29)
Interview with Kevin Washburn on federal recognition reforms (5/27)
Editorial: BIA shouldn't be altering federal recognition process (5/27)
BIA plans separate meets for recognized, non-recognized tribes (5/26)
Little Shell Chippewa Tribe welcomes federal recognition reform (5/23)
Federal recognition reforms might not help tribes in Connecticut (5/23)
BIA announces regulation to reform federal recognition process (5/22)
Opinion: Federal recognition matters influenced by lobbyists (03/14)
Editorial: Connecticut argues against its own recognized tribes (3/13)
Editorial: Some Indians become inconvenient for Connecticut (3/7)
Editorial: Don't let BIA water down federal recognition process (3/6)
Connecticut governor opposes BIA federal recognition reforms (2/27) Connecticut politicians want BIA to drop recognition reform (8/30)
Connecticut leads opposition to federal recognition reforms (8/26)
BIA extends comment period on federal recognition proposal (08/13)
Join the Conversation
