indianz.com your internet resource indianz.com on facebook indianz.com on twitter indianz.com on Google+ indianz.com on soundcloud
phone: 202 630 8439
Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP
Advertise on Indianz.Com
Home > News > Headlines
Print   Subscribe
David Ganje: South Dakota needs to reform eminent domain law

Filed Under: Opinion
More on: david ganje, native sun news, south dakota
     
   

David Ganje

South Dakota’s approach to condemnation
By David Ganje
For The Native Sun News Today
nativesunnews.today

The use of eminent domain (condemnation) is a modern legal problem.

Condemnation is the taking of property for a public and in some cases a private interest. Condemnation is a legally sanctioned sword. My argument in this article is not that eminent domain as a concept is wrong. My argument is that in its present state, as a legal vehicle attempting to provide fairness, eminent domain is a lemon in need of repair on both sides.

This law allows a governmental body – and a private business – to convert privately owned land to another use, often over the objections of the landowner. Traditionally in a legal taking a landowner receives “market value” for the land taken. This often includes money for reduction in agriculture output or for the loss of other productive use of the land.

Problems with the current law: 1. While eminent domain makes sense under a public utility easement paradigm, how does this process apply when a pipeline easement on a landowner’s property is the “transportation vehicle” for a commodity? How does one calculate “fair market value” when millions of dollars’ worth of product are flowing across privately-held land? Candidate Trump said, “I want the Keystone pipeline, but the people of the United States should be given a piece, a significant piece of the profits.” South Dakota law does not take this into consideration.

2. Condemnation of one’s land involves forced negotiation required by law, and sometimes involuntary litigation. Is a one-time payment for an easement fair compensation? Is the condemnor (developer or government agency) required to provide its plan of work and operations to the condemnee (property owner) so the owner can evaluate this information? This would create a fairer playing field in negotiations. South Dakota law does not provide for this.

3. Should the landowner be granted his expenses and attorney’s fees in a trial and for an appeal if the final award given is greater than the last ‘offer’ made by the condemnor? Or if a mistrial is called which is not the fault of the landowner? South Dakota law does not provide for this.

4. Is the condemnor required to provide written disclosure of its calculations and basis for a proposed offer for the property? South Dakota law does not provide for this.

5. In a federal condemnation, even if a landowner does not formally answer the lawsuit the landowner may still present evidence of the value of his land and may participate in the distribution of awarded monies. South Dakota law does not provide for this.

6. State law allows condemnation for a ‘public use,’ but the law does not define ‘public use.’ This leaves great discretion in the hands of those in power. There exists no statutory guideline or restriction on what is considered public use in a condemnation proceeding, except those involving telephone services. The exercise of prevailing political winds by those in power should never be the benchmark for the taking of property.


Read the rest of the story on the Native Sun News Today website: South Dakota’s approach to condemnation

(David Ganje practices law in the area of natural resources, environmental and commercial law. His website is Lexenergy.net)

Copyright permission Native Sun News


Copyright © Indianz.Com
More headlines...
Stay Connected:
On Facebook

On Twitter

On Google+

On SoundCloud
Local Links:
Federal Register | Indian Gaming | Jobs & Notices | In The Hoop | Message Board
Latest News:
Documents show few meetings between Secretary Zinke and tribes (5/22)
Landowners on 2 reservations in Nebraska receive buy-back offers (5/22)
Human Rights Complaint: 'We are only letting the white people in' (5/22)
Mark Trahant: Funds for Indian health in danger under Republicans (5/22)
Cronkite News: Navajo Nation school works hard to teach language (5/22)
Harlan McKosato: DNA tests can't reveal your unique tribal history (5/22)
Gyasi Ross: Fired FBI director made sure Peltier remained in prison (5/22)
Tiffany Midge: A response to winning the cultural appropriation prize (5/22)
André Cramblit: Treasure your aunties and uncles for their histories (5/22)
Treaty tribes celebrate after court refuses to rehear salmon dispute (5/22)
Eastern Cherokee leaders open impeachment hearing against chief (5/22)
Top Interior nominee contradicts Trump on 'race' and tribal programs (5/19)
Arne Vainio: Expressing gratitude for the people we have around us (5/19)
Lawmakers dug deep to help North Dakota with #NoDAPL response (5/19)
Quapaw Tribe secures EPA grant for cleanup of contaminated lands (5/19)
Steven Newcomb: The racist and toxic roots of federal Indian policy (5/19)
Indian Country braces for worst with Trump's planned budget cuts (5/18)
Bipartisan task force announced to look into Indian Health Service (5/18)
Lawmakers push to renew Special Diabetes Program for Indians (5/18)
Albert Bender: Police slaughter of Native people rages unabated (5/18)
Steve Russell: There's a downside to impeaching Donald Trump (5/18)
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe cannabis consultant goes on trial (5/18)
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe repays money to address federal audit (5/18)
House passes bill to extend federal recognition to Virginia tribes (5/18)
Kalispel Tribe using bottled water at casino after contamination (5/18)
Leech Lake Band wins approval to build new casino at new site (5/18)
Tohono O'odham Nation secures victory in long-running dispute (5/17)
Dakota Access seeks to intervene in Oglala Sioux Tribe's lawsuit (5/17)
Senate Committee on Indian Affairs approves 3 bills at meeting (5/17)
Indian Health Service and 'high risk' tribal programs on agenda (5/17)
Bureau of Indian Affairs designates service area for Tejon Tribe (5/17)
Ruth Hopkins: Taxpayers footing $15M bill for DAPL private army (5/17)
Matthew Fletcher: Expect litigation after Supreme Court decision (5/17)
Alex Jacobs: Trump is starting to act like he's guilty of something (5/17)
Yakama Nation spars with county official over road resurfacing (5/17)
Spirit Lake Nation suspends referendum on liquor sales at casino (5/17)
Court supports release of $380M in Keepseagle settlement funds (5/16)
Indian Country leaders testify about funding needs on Capitol Hill (5/16)
House panel sets hearing on future of Cobell buy-back program (5/16)
Cronkite News: Navajo Nation homes still without running water (5/16)
more headlines...

Home | Arts & Entertainment | Business | Canada | Cobell Lawsuit | Education | Environment | Federal Recognition | Federal Register | Forum | Health | Humor | Indian Gaming | Indian Trust | Jack Abramoff Scandal | Jobs & Notices | Law | National | News | Opinion | Politics | Sports | Technology | World

Indianz.Com Terms of Service | Indianz.Com Privacy Policy
About Indianz.Com | Advertise on Indianz.Com

Indianz.Com is a product of Noble Savage Media, LLC and Ho-Chunk, Inc.