FROM THE ARCHIVE
Native Hawaiian lawsuit dismissed
Facebook Twitter Email
FRIDAY, JULY 13, 2001

Without ruling on the case's merits, a federal judge in Hawaii on Thursday dimissed a lawsuit challenging programs that benefit Native Hawaiians.

US District Judge David Ezra dismissed the lawsuit because the man who filed it had not actually applied for any of the programs administered by the Office of Hawaiian Affairs.

Ever since the state lost the Rice v. Cayetano lawsuit, various lawsuits have been filed challenging Native Hawaiian programs. As a result, OHA board positions are now open to non-Natives and Native Hawaiians fear loss of homelands and other benefits if other lawsuits succeed.

A bill to recognize a government-to-government relationship with Native Hawaiians has been introduced in Congress.

Get the Story:
OHA challenge dismissed (The Honolulu Star-Bulletin 7/13)
Judge dismisses lawsuit challenging Hawaiian programs (AP 7/12)

Related Stories:
Shift in Senate means changes for Indian Country (5/25)
Senate confirms Olson as Solicitor General (5/25)
Native Hawaiian lands threatened (5/24)
Indian Law and the Supreme Court (12/11)
OHA survives elections (11/14)
Final Hawaiian report released (10/24)
Native Hawaiian bill passes House (9/27)
Hawaiian affairs still controversial (9/13)
US recommends Hawaiian sovereignty (8/24)
Non-Natives win battle in suit (8/17)
Where are the Dems on tribes? (8/16)
March raises sovereignty awareness (8/14)
The GOP 2000 Platform on Native Americans (8/1)
Group challenges Hawaii (7/7)
Hawaiians march for sovereignty (7/5)
Sovereignty protests aim to educate (7/3)