FROM THE ARCHIVE
Case proceeding against N.M. tribes
Facebook Twitter Email
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2002

A federal appeals court has cleared the way for New Mexico Attorney General Patricia Madrid to continue suing two tribes who refuse to share casino revenues with the state.

The Mescalero Apache Nation and Pojoaque Pueblo have been challenging whether they could be sued at all. The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals last Thursday said yes.

Other tribes in the state negotiated new gaming compacts with Madrid with the condition that they make back payments under a 16 percent revenue sharing rate. The Mescalero and Pojoaque tribes believe the rate is illegal.

Get the Story:
Judge Can Rule on Gaming Payments, Court Says (The Albuquerque Journal 2/2)

Related Stories:
Response wanted on N.M. gaming suit (1/10)
Casino challenge not a worry to state (12/24)
N.M. lawmaker sues over gaming compacts (12/21)
Pueblo opening casino expansion (12/20)
N.M. compacts finally becoming legal (12/18)
N.M. gaming compacts almost legal (12/13)
Pueblo fighting gaming agreement (11/29)
N.M. compacts approved (11/26)
N.M. tribes want compact approved (11/16)
Mescalero Apache elect leaders (11/8)
N.M. has received $88M from tribes (10/29)
Acoma Pueblo makes gaming payment (10/16)
N.M. sends compacts to Interior (10/10)
N.M. casino settlement blocked (9/19)
Pueblo fights casino settlement (9/4)
Tribes, N.M. want $91M settlement cleared (8/28)
N.M. gaming compacts delayed (8/16)
N.M. tribes settle casino payments (8/10)
N.M. tribes make casino payment deal (8/9)
Pueblo reaches casino payment deal (8/8)
Pueblo casino operating on old compact (6/19)
Tribes, state can't agree on casino payments (5/30)
Pueblo spends all its profits (4/17)
N.M. tribes: $1B to state (3/15)
Gaming 'refund' bill moves along (3/14)
State wants casino back payments (2/23)
NM Tribes ordered to make casino payments (2/14)
NM Tribes may get new compacts (2/13)
Court: New Mexico tribes can be sued (12/8)
Gaming tribes ask for dismissal (8/15)
State sues tribes (6/14)