printer friendly version
Column: Churchill asked why we were attacked
Friday, February 4, 2005
"It's easy to attack University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill. He went too far in his essay 'Some People Push Back: On the Justice of Roosting Chickens.' He made overstatements, praised the Sept. 11 terrorists as noble heroes and labeled their victims as criminals who deserved what they got.
If you put aside Churchill's angry words, his message is something that every American needs to consider. Why were we attacked? After Sept. 11, I repeatedly asked this question on the radio and in this column, and I was stunned by the vitriolic response that I received from listeners and readers.
People accused me of "justifying" the terrorists, being a terrorist sympathizer, an unpatriotic American and a heartless jerk. Some people told me to shut my mouth until after I'd visited ground zero, while hundreds of others suggested that I leave the United States. No one was willing to have a rational conversation about why we were attacked.
We can clearly see the connection between Churchill's statements and the public effort against him, but we seem unable or unwilling to see the connection between U.S. foreign policy and terrorist reactions against it."
Get the Story:
Reggie Rivers: Churchill rant has some truth
(The Denver Post 2/4)
Read the Essay:"Some
People Push Back" On the Justice of Roosting Chickens
(Pockets of Resistance
Related Stories:Professor angry at Jodi Rave for questioning
(2/3) Speech featuring
controversial professor canceled
(2/2) College professor quits post over 9/11-Nazi essay
(2/1) College professor faces action for
(1/31) Professor sparks
controversy with 9/11-Nazi link
Copyright � 2000-2004 Indianz.Com