Editorial: ICWA shouldn't hurt Indian children

"It was May 2005, and Max was almost 6 years old. His front teeth were rotten, and his mother did not understand how to administer his asthma medicine. Max's sister, Nicole, suffered from dissociative disorder and was struggling with nightmares and memories of fights between her parents. Though she was more than 3 years old, she had not been potty trained.

The children's parents had chronic drug and alcohol problems; on at least one occasion, the mother called police because her husband had threatened to kill her. That May, a Montgomery County Circuit Court judge ordered the children placed temporarily in the home of an aunt, where subsequently they seemed to thrive, according to testimony from social workers and therapists. The aunt would later be awarded custody.

But a novel ruling this summer from the Maryland Court of Special Appeals threatens to throw Max and Nicole's lives into turmoil again simply because they are Native American. Although the children's biological father is non-Indian, Max and Nicole's mother is part Yankton Sioux, making the children subject to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). The 1978 federal law seeks to keep Native American families intact; it applies to Max and Nicole even though they have not had contact with the Yankton Sioux Tribe in South Dakota, and their mother has lived in a non-Indian home since she was a few months old.

The ICWA makes it more difficult for courts to remove children from a dysfunctional Native American home than from one of any other race or ethnicity. Government agencies, for example, must prove that "active efforts" -- rather than the more typical "reasonable efforts" -- were made to rehabilitate drug-addled or psychologically impaired Indian parents before taking away their children. If an agency is unable to help the parents, the law strongly urges a search for Native American guardians. Max and Nicole's aunt -- a relative on their father's side -- is not Native American. A lawyer for the tribe argued that the Circuit Court had not made the required "active efforts."

Get the Story:
Editorial: A Tribal Question (The Washington Post 10/9)

Relevant Links:
National Indian Child Welfare Association - http://www.nicwa.org

Related Stories:
Man charged with murder of Cherokee boy, 5 (10/4)
Oregon tribes hold Indian child welfare conference (9/27)
Court denies tribal jurisdiction in ICWA case (9/14)
Native kids overrepresented Oregon foster care (07/25)
Maryland appeals court issues first ICWA ruling (07/09)
More Native children being abused and neglected (7/6)
Florida court rejects Seminole Tribe in ICWA case (5/31)
Minnesota tribes to control Indian child welfare (5/25)
Indian child welfare conference opens in Oklahoma (04/17)
Opinion: Partner on Alaska Native child welfare (4/16)
Indian child welfare conference in Oklahoma City (4/12)
Seneca appeals court rules in child custody dispute (4/6)
Woman fought for custody of nephew under ICWA (4/4)
Opinion: ICWA tears children from their families (3/29)
MSU law school discusses Indian Child Welfare Act (03/16)
Cheyenne-Arapaho girl battles chronic lung disease (03/16)
Court asserts jurisdiction in Seneca child case (03/14)
White boy most dangerous threat to Seneca Nation (3/5)
Film to focus on Alaska Native woman taken from family (3/2)
Minnesota tribes sign child welfare agreement (2/23)
Death of teen ruled an accidental overdose (02/15)
Judge won't let siblings attend teen brother's funeral (12/20)
Washington teen's death called a failure of ICWA (12/18)
Court wants Tohono O'odham twins with siblings (12/07)
Navajo Nation seeks role in adoption of baby (10/30)
Navajo Nation seeks role in adoption of baby (10/30)
Navajo Nation challenges adoption in Utah (10/26)
Woman connects adopted Indians with tribal roots (07/03)
U.S. Supreme Court won't hear Indian child welfare case (05/02)
Christian Mag: Children at mercy of ICWA tribes (04/14)
California appeals court rules in ICWA transfer case (03/10)
Paper concludes series on Indian child welfare (01/06)
Rapid City Journal runs series on Indian child welfare (1/5)
South Dakota panel pressed on Indian child welfare (10/04)
White Earth Band seeks control of child custody case (09/15)
Meskwaki mother decides not to give up baby son (08/26)
Oglala Sioux Tribe seeks role in child welfare case (8/25)
Indian mother gives up son to non-Indian couple (08/15)
Child welfare case handed to Ute Mountain Ute Tribe (8/8)
Meskwaki mother asks tribe not to hold up adoption (07/28)
9th Circuit rules against tribe in California ICWA case (07/20)
Meskwaki mom wants son to go to non-Native family (07/06)
Adopted Navajo child to return home to reservation (06/22)
Wisconsin tribes form child welfare partnership (06/16)
GAO calls for better state data in ICWA cases (04/08)
Failures cited in child abuse on Utah reservation (03/21)
Couple says mother didn't want son in her tribe (03/01)
Hearing slated on custody dispute over Indian boy (02/28)
Yellow Bird: A nation cannot flourish without children (02/01)
Indian mother in South Dakota wants adopted son back (01/31)
Navajo child welfare case sparks legal battle (01/31)
New Mexico infant law said to conflict with ICWA (01/28)
Iowa announces foster care plan for Indian children (11/24)
Alaska opinion backs away from tribal courts (11/01)
Alaska wants to reduce tribal powers in child welfare (09/09)
Fort Peck Tribes sign child welfare agreement (09/07)
Dispute over child welfare contract continues (09/06)
South Dakota Supreme Court supports ICWA case (08/27)
Choctaw Nation helping man in child custody battle (07/06)
Foster care commission seeks tribal inclusion (05/19)
Judge cites ICWA in returning drug addicted baby (03/22)
Native children living in poor, single-parent homes (03/19)
S.D. tribes unhappy with gutting of ICWA bill (02/24)
Bill seeks study of Indian child welfare system in S.D. (02/05)
High rate of Indian adoptions in Iowa protested (01/13)