Delvin Cree: 'Fighting Sioux' dispute divided communities
"Now that the "Fighting Sioux" controversy has "simmered" down a bit, I thought maybe it would be appropriate to say something about this issue that has divided so many people.

I have observed many non-Indian supporters blow "steam" since the retirement of the name and logo as it was announced by the State Board of Higher Education. A lot of "racist" behavior has also resurfaced bringing out the worst of non-indian people. These kind of insensitive acts and behavior is an example why the use of our imagery has to end. This issue has divided the tribal communities as well.

When it was decided North Dakota Sioux tribes be the deciding factor if the name and logo can continue to be used myself and others had to contest that decision brought forth by the non-Indian community.

Tribal members, no matter what affiliation they come from, are highly affected by the use of our imagery. For example on a previous roster, a steer performing a sexual act on an Indian is a perfect example of insensitive behavior toward the use of Indian imagery. This poster appeared before a "Fighting Sioux vs. Texas team game.

I have reason to believe if the name wasn't retired, then other action would have taken place in a federal courtroom."

Get the Story:
Delvin Cree: The Sioux controversy (The Minot Daily News 5/2)

Another Opinion:
Jerry Shea: Council should accept will of people (The Grand Forks Herald 5/2)
pwpwd
Voices of American Indian UND students (The Grand Forks Herald 5/1)
pwpwd

North Dakota Supreme Court Decision:
Davidson v. North Dakota (April 8, 2010)

Related Stories:
Erich Longie: Such an outpouring of support for Indians (04/29)
Supporters of 'Fighting Sioux' push for tribal referendum (4/22)
Column: 'Fighting Sioux' supporters overlook race issues (4/22)
Column: Time for 'Fighting Sioux' supporters to move on (4/19)
Supporters of 'Fighting Sioux' still hopeful for tribal vote (4/15)
Editorial: Eliminating 'Fighting Sioux' was right decision (4/14)
Opinion: Standing Rock Sioux Tribe fails on Fighting Sioux (4/13)
North Dakota board kills 'Fighting Sioux' nickname and logo (4/9)
Editorial: Keep 'Fighting Sioux' nickname for North Dakota (4/8)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe puts off vote on 'Fighting Sioux' (4/7)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe considers 'Fighting Sioux' petition (4/6)
Column: Debate over 'Fighting Sioux' all about the money (3/25)
North Dakota court hears case on 'Fighting Sioux' name (3/24)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe pushed on 'Fighting Sioux' vote (3/23)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe to get 'Fighting Sioux' petition (3/12)
Standing Rock petition calls for vote on 'Fighting Sioux' (3/3)
Column: It's past time to get rid of 'Fighting Sioux' nick (2/26)
Letter: 'Fighting Sioux' not honoring Indian people (2/22)
Board takes no action on status of 'Fighting Sioux' (2/18)
Letter: Give tribes time to think over 'Fighting Sioux' (2/17)
Erich Longie: Divide and conquer for 'Fighting Sioux' (2/15)
'Fighting Sioux' supporters want Standing Rock vote (2/10)
Column: Long saga over 'Fighting Sioux' continues (12/21)
Judge to issue 'Fighting Sioux' decision this month (12/10)
Judge to hear tribal member suit for 'Fighting Sioux' (12/9)
Michael Eshkibok: Colonization and 'Fighting Sioux' (12/7)
Tom Iron: A tribal backer of 'Fighting Sioux' name (11/23)
Police probe potential threats over 'Fighting Sioux' (11/20)
Standing Rock chairman not pushing 'Sioux' vote (11/19)
Editorial: Give tribe more time on 'Fighting Sioux' (11/16)
Editorial: A bizarre delay for 'Fighting Sioux' nick (11/12)
Judge orders delay on 'Fighting Sioux' nickname (11/10)