Options dwindling for tribes as Dakota Access prepares to move oil


Native women lead a round dance in front of the Trump International Hotel as part of the Native Nations Rise march in Washington, D.C., on March 10, 2017. Photo: Indianz.Com / Available for use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

With options dwindling, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe is mounting a last-minute challenge to prevent oil from flowing through the Dakota Access Pipeline.

As thousands of Native citizens and their allies participated in a historic march and rally in Washington, D.C., the tribe was escalating a lawsuit in federal court. New papers filed on Friday call for an injunction to stop the pipeline while the case makes its way through the appeals process.

"The tribe seeks an injunction pending appeal requesting that this court prevent the flow of oil through the Dakota Access Pipeline, which would result in the ultimate harm to tribal members’ free exercise of religion," attorneys wrote in the 18-page document.

The tribe and its citizens contend the presence of the pipeline in the Missouri River renders the water impure for ceremonies like sweat lodges and coming of age rites. They also believe the controversial project fulfills a prophecy of a "Black Snake" that will destroy the Lakota people and their way of life.

The threat was notably on display at the Native Nations Rise event on Friday. A group of younger participants, dubbing themselves the "Black Snake Killers," set up a teepee in front of the Trump International Hotel, just blocks from the White House, to show their opposition to a pipeline that is all but certain to become operational unless the courts take action.


The gesture, coupled with a round dance led by Native women, was more than symbolic. It was a visible message to President Donald Trump, whose administration turned its back on the #NoDAPL movement without consulting the affected tribes.

But while Judge James E. Boasberg has shown sympathy toward the spiritual beliefs of the tribe, he too has refused to stop the project. In a decision issued on March 7, he said Cheyenne River leaders waited too long to seek an injunction based on religious grounds.

The tribe is now taking the matter to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, according to a notice that was filed on Friday. The escalation marks the case's second journey to the higher court, whose judges once imposed an injunction that halted construction activities near the Missouri in North Dakota.

But the situation has changed dramatically in the last few months. After being delayed by the Obama administration, Dakota Access now has permission, in the form of an easement, to drill under the river and place the pipeline underneath.

At the time of an October 5 hearing in the case, some judges on the D.C. Circuit questioned why Dakota Access kept working in North Dakota despite lacking the easement.

"So it's a gamble," Judge Thomas B. Griffith said during arguments. "You're gambling you're going to win."


The gamble indeed paid off for Dakota Access. Just four days after being sworn in as the 45th president of the United States, Trump ordered his administration to consider the pipeline in an "expedited" manner.

Barely two weeks after that, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers agreed to issue the easement to Dakota Access and work promptly began on the final portion of the 1,172-mile project in North Dakota.

Oil is now set to flow through the pipeline as early as next week, according to the project's wealthy backers. According to a status report filed on Monday, construction crews are ready to place the pipe below the Missouri by the end of the week.

"The company anticipates pulling the pipe through this week and then commencing final testing," attorneys for Dakota Access wrote.

"As a result, Dakota Access projects that oil may be introduced in this part of the line between Monday, March 20, 2017 and Wednesday, March 22, 2017, depending upon the success of the testing," the filing continued.


Dakota Access filed another status report in federal court on March 13, 2017, indicating work on the final portion of the pipeline in North Dakota is almost complete.

The timeline means Cheyenne River is running out of time to secure an injunction, either from Judge Boasberg or from the D.C. Circuit. Tribal attorneys expect to file "emergency" papers if the injunction is denied while the appeal is being pursued.

Leaders of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe are also running out of options. They have asked Boasberg to set aside the easement granted to Dakota Access but it's entirely possible the pipeline will be operational before arguments are complete on that issue.

"We faced a lot of obstacles and we faced a lot of setbacks," Chairman Dave Archambault II said at a rally in front of the White House on Friday. "But we're not defeated. We're not defeated."

Join the Conversation
Related Stories:
Native citizens rally in nation's capital to send message to Trump (3/10)
Recap: Thousands march to White House for Native Nations Rise (3/10)
Recap: Large crowd for Native Nations Rise rally at White House (3/10)
Dakota Access defends effort to keep oil spill documents secret (3/9)
Native Sun News Today: Water protectors take DAPL fight to DC (3/9)
Ivan Star Comes Out: Water protectors experienced raw trauma (3/9)
Judge refuses to halt Dakota Access as pipeline nears completion (3/7)
Dakota Access revises timeline after making 'very good progress' (3/6)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe leads Native Nations Rise march in DC (3/6)
Award-winning group raises funds for Water Protector legal fund (3/6)
Ruling expected this week on injunction against Dakota Access (3/6)
Dakota Access trying to keep documents from tribes and public (3/2)
Senate confirms Dakota Access ally to lead Energy Department (3/2)
Bill to approve non-Indian casinos in North Dakota called 'racist' (3/2)
North Dakota gains financially with completion of Dakota Access (3/2)
Native Sun News Today: Evictions end historic #NoDAPL campsite (3/1)
Winona LaDuke: Water protectors are still standing strong all over (3/1)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe waiting on Dakota Access injunction (2/28)
Peter d'Errico: Yankton Sioux Tribe battles Dakota Access in court (2/28)
Sioux Nation citizens seek to join Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit (2/27)
Dakota Access files another status update on construction work (2/27)
Mark Trahant: The story of Standing Rock won't be going away (2/27)
Jenni Monet: Tribes continue fight as #NoDAPL camps evicted (2/27)
Albert Bender: The war against Dakota Access can still be won (2/27)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe blasts Trump claim of 'constant contact' (2/24)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe calls out Trump 'lies' on Dakota Access (2/24)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe slams Trump for lack of consultation (2/23)
Indian Country joins legal push to block Dakota Access Pipeline (2/22)
Dakota Access offers up March 6 as earliest date for completion (2/22)
Trump administration opposes injunction against Dakota Access (2/22)
Trump team puts hold on pro-tribal Dakota Access legal opinion (2/22)
Native Sun News Today: #NoDAPL campsites see their final days (2/22)
Elizabeth Cook-Lynn: Dakota Access is everything wrong with US (2/22)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe hopes to see return of casino business (2/21)
Dina Gilio-Whitaker: Sen. Hoeven raises red flags in Indian Country (2/20)
Bureau of Indian Affairs issues 'trespass' notice to #NoDAPL camp (2/17)
Hearing on injunction against Dakota Access moved to February 28 (2/17)
Army Department formally cancels Dakota Access Pipeline review (2/16)
Native Sun News Today: Dakota Access firms see spills, explosions (2/16)
James Giago Davies: Tribes face bigger threat than Dakota Access (2/16)
Monte Mills: Tribes turn to courts to battle Dakota Access Pipeline (2/16)
Standing Rock leader vows to 'forgive' despite White House slight (2/15)
Freedom Socialist: Voices from water protectors at Standing Rock (2/15)
New leader of key House panel defends handling of Dakota Access (2/14)
Dakota Access ready to start transporting oil sooner than expected (2/13)
More tribes join effort to halt completion of Dakota Access Pipeline (2/13)
Army Corps gave go ahead to Dakota Access Pipeline in key memo (2/13)
Mark Trahant: Battle over Dakota Access Pipeline is far from over (2/13)
Tribes head back to court in hopes of halting Dakota Access Pipeline (2/10)
Dakota Access pushes to finish pipeline with Army Corps easement (2/9)
Mark Charles: The real reason Trump hasn't heard about #NoDAPL (2/9)
James Giago Davies: Dakota Access battle has got us divided again (2/9)
Tribes promise fight to keep Dakota Access Pipeline out of homeland (2/8)
Key Dakota Access document from Army Corps wasn't filed in court (2/8)
J. Gabriel Ware & James Trimarco: City breaks with bank over DAPL (2/8)
Tracy Loeffelholz Dunn: In defense of Native journalist Jenni Monet (2/8)
Chelsey Luger: Media is still trying to divide and conquer our people (2/8)
Peter d'Errico: Even Donald Trump can't trample over tribal treaties (2/8)
Andrea Carmen/Roberto Borrero: Trump's slash and burn on treaties (2/8)
Trump administration formally approves easement for Dakota Access (2/7)
Mark Trahant: Native journalist charged by North Dakota authorities (2/7)
Albert Bender: Donald Trump goes blitzkrieg on #NoDAPL movement (2/7)
Dakota Access offers timeline as Trump finalizes decision on pipeline (2/6)
Ladonna Bravebull Allard: Indigenous nations must stand our ground (2/6)
Jenni Monet: I got arrested for reporting on the #NoDAPL movement (2/6)
Ray Cook: Now it is time for all of us to stand down at Standing Rock (2/6)
Frances Madeson: More tribes joining with #DefundDAPL movement (2/3)
Mark Trahant: Donald Trump's 'logic' on the Dakota Access Pipeline (2/1)
Winona LaDuke: Tribes emboldened by resistance at Standing Rock (2/1)
Native Sun News Today: Tribes push back on Trump's pipeline orders (2/1)
Advertisement
Tags
Trending in News
More Headlines