Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe sees another Dakota Access setback


Thousands of tribal citizens and their allies march through the streets of Washington, D.C., as part of Native Nations Rise on March 10, 2017. Photo by Indianz.Com / Available for use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

The Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe was dealt another setback as a federal appeals court rejected an emergency request to halt the Dakota Access Pipeline.

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an order on Saturday afternoon -- a not unusual occurrence in the closely-watched case -- denying the tribe's motion for an injunction. While the ruling does not spell the end of the dispute, it means oil will likely start flowing through the pipeline as early as Monday.

“The fight against the DAPL is far from over. The court still has to consider our treaty and trust arguments, which we think are very strong," Chairman Harold Frazier said last Thursday as the tribe mounted its appeal to the D.C. Circuit.

The tribe raised religious objections to the pipeline, saying its presence in the Missouri River renders the water impure for ceremonies such as sweat lodges and coming of age rites. A federal judge on March 7, though, said Cheyenne River leaders waited too long to bring those concerns to court.

The decision prompted the tribe to take the matter to the D.C. Circuit and to seek an injunction pending appeal. The court's order said the tribe "has not satisfied the stringent requirements" for such a request.

Judge Patricia Ann Millett -- who was nominated to the court by president Barack Obama -- issued a statement noting that the tribe's religious claims have not "yet even been accepted as an issue in the litigation."

Despite the setback, the tribe is still hoping to stop the pipeline through other legal means. A motion to set aside the Trump administration's approval of the project is pending before Judge James E. Boasberg although it's highly likely oil will be flowing before he reaches a decision.

The 1,172-mile pipeline is all but finished except for a small segment on federally-managed land in North Dakota. A status update is expected later on Monday and could finally offer a firm date for the project's completion.

D.C Circuit Court of Appeals Order:
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (March 18, 2018)

Join the Conversation

Related Stories
National Museum of American Indian expresses 'regret' for incident (3/17)
Native Sun News Today: 'We're still here and we're not going away'(3/17)
Options dwindling for tribes as Dakota Access readies to move oil (3/13)
Native citizens rally in nation's capital to send message to Trump (3/10)
Recap: Thousands march to White House for Native Nations Rise (3/10)
Recap: Large crowd for Native Nations Rise rally at White House (3/10)
Dakota Access defends effort to keep oil spill documents secret (3/9)
Native Sun News Today: Water protectors take DAPL fight to DC (3/9)
Ivan Star Comes Out: Water protectors experienced raw trauma (3/9)
Judge refuses to halt Dakota Access as pipeline nears completion (3/7)
Dakota Access revises timeline after making 'very good progress' (3/6)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe leads Native Nations Rise march in DC (3/6)
Award-winning group raises funds for Water Protector legal fund (3/6)
Ruling expected this week on injunction against Dakota Access (3/6)
Dakota Access trying to keep documents from tribes and public (3/2)
Senate confirms Dakota Access ally to lead Energy Department (3/2)
Bill to approve non-Indian casinos in North Dakota called 'racist' (3/2)
North Dakota gains financially with completion of Dakota Access (3/2)
Native Sun News Today: Evictions end historic #NoDAPL campsite (3/1)
Winona LaDuke: Water protectors are still standing strong all over (3/1)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe waiting on Dakota Access injunction (2/28)
Peter d'Errico: Yankton Sioux Tribe battles Dakota Access in court (2/28)
Sioux Nation citizens seek to join Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit (2/27)
Dakota Access files another status update on construction work (2/27)
Mark Trahant: The story of Standing Rock won't be going away (2/27)
Jenni Monet: Tribes continue fight as #NoDAPL camps evicted (2/27)
Albert Bender: The war against Dakota Access can still be won (2/27)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe blasts Trump claim of 'constant contact' (2/24)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe calls out Trump 'lies' on Dakota Access (2/24)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe slams Trump for lack of consultation (2/23)
Indian Country joins legal push to block Dakota Access Pipeline (2/22)
Dakota Access offers up March 6 as earliest date for completion (2/22)
Trump administration opposes injunction against Dakota Access (2/22)
Trump team puts hold on pro-tribal Dakota Access legal opinion (2/22)
Native Sun News Today: #NoDAPL campsites see their final days (2/22)
Elizabeth Cook-Lynn: Dakota Access is everything wrong with US (2/22)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe hopes to see return of casino business (2/21)
Dina Gilio-Whitaker: Sen. Hoeven raises red flags in Indian Country (2/20)
Bureau of Indian Affairs issues 'trespass' notice to #NoDAPL camp (2/17)
Hearing on injunction against Dakota Access moved to February 28 (2/17)
Army Department formally cancels Dakota Access Pipeline review (2/16)
Native Sun News Today: Dakota Access firms see spills, explosions (2/16)
James Giago Davies: Tribes face bigger threat than Dakota Access (2/16)
Monte Mills: Tribes turn to courts to battle Dakota Access Pipeline (2/16)
Standing Rock leader vows to 'forgive' despite White House slight (2/15)
Freedom Socialist: Voices from water protectors at Standing Rock (2/15)
New leader of key House panel defends handling of Dakota Access (2/14)
Dakota Access ready to start transporting oil sooner than expected (2/13)
More tribes join effort to halt completion of Dakota Access Pipeline (2/13)
Army Corps gave go ahead to Dakota Access Pipeline in key memo (2/13)
Mark Trahant: Battle over Dakota Access Pipeline is far from over (2/13)
Tribes head back to court in hopes of halting Dakota Access Pipeline (2/10)
Dakota Access pushes to finish pipeline with Army Corps easement (2/9)
Mark Charles: The real reason Trump hasn't heard about #NoDAPL (2/9)
James Giago Davies: Dakota Access battle has got us divided again (2/9)
Tribes promise fight to keep Dakota Access Pipeline out of homeland (2/8)
Key Dakota Access document from Army Corps wasn't filed in court (2/8)
J. Gabriel Ware & James Trimarco: City breaks with bank over DAPL (2/8)
Tracy Loeffelholz Dunn: In defense of Native journalist Jenni Monet (2/8)
Chelsey Luger: Media is still trying to divide and conquer our people (2/8)
Peter d'Errico: Even Donald Trump can't trample over tribal treaties (2/8)
Andrea Carmen/Roberto Borrero: Trump's slash and burn on treaties (2/8)
Trump administration formally approves easement for Dakota Access (2/7)
Mark Trahant: Native journalist charged by North Dakota authorities (2/7)
Albert Bender: Donald Trump goes blitzkrieg on #NoDAPL movement (2/7)
Dakota Access offers timeline as Trump finalizes decision on pipeline (2/6)
Ladonna Bravebull Allard: Indigenous nations must stand our ground (2/6)
Jenni Monet: I got arrested for reporting on the #NoDAPL movement (2/6)
Ray Cook: Now it is time for all of us to stand down at Standing Rock (2/6)
Frances Madeson: More tribes joining with #DefundDAPL movement (2/3)
Mark Trahant: Donald Trump's 'logic' on the Dakota Access Pipeline (2/1)
Winona LaDuke: Tribes emboldened by resistance at Standing Rock (2/1)
Native Sun News Today: Tribes push back on Trump's pipeline orders (2/1)