But Democrats and some witnesses at the hearing pointed to a long list of studies that they said demonstrate, in the words of Rep. G.K. Butterfield, D-Norht Carolina, that, “Voting ID laws have been shown to disproportionately decrease minority turnout.” The committee debate comes as the Arizona Legislature is considering several election bills that echo the national debate, with one side saying the changes protect and the other side saying they restrict voting. The state had 23 restrictive voting bills for the 2021 legislative session, the third-most in the nation, according to a report by the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University. It also had 15 Democrat-backed voting-expansion bills, but those were quickly killed in the Legislature. State lawmakers have already passed one measure that would stop the practice of automatically mailing ballots to voters on the state’s Permanent Early Voting List – now called the Active Early Voting List – if they had not voted in at least one election over a four-year period. Gov. Doug Ducey signed that bill into law on May 11.
Today, the Subcommittee on Elections held its third hearing in a series examining voting and election administration. Chair @GKButterfield gave remarks on the potential for voter ID laws, proof-of-citizenship laws, and lack of multilingual support to impact access to the ballot: pic.twitter.com/35E6xOucHZ— Committee on House Admn. Democrats (@HouseAdm_Dems) May 24, 2021
Democrats blasted the measure as an effort to purge voting rolls. But Ducey said the move only brings Arizona into line with other states that have early voting lists, like California, and that the law requires election officials to reach out to those voters, who can still request a mail-in ballot. Another pending proposal would stiffen voter ID requirements for absentee ballots. Voters would have to provide their date of birth along with either their driver’s license number or a voter registration number. Sponsors of the bill did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday, but critics said the measure, if passed, would confuse voters and increase the chances that their ballots would be thrown out for minor errors. It would also make mail-in voting harder for minority voters, thousands of whom do not have driver’s licenses. “Driver’s license possession is skewed towards wealthier and white voters,” said Ryan Snow, an attorney with the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, who said voting needs to be treated as a right, not a privilege. “This new restriction will have a disproportionately higher burden on minority groups, which is very concerning.”
Arizona Governor signs two voter suppression bills that disproportionately impact Navajo voters pic.twitter.com/mSm5tyoQcH— Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez (@NNPrezNez) May 12, 2021
Snow also said that under the mail-in voting bill, SB 1713, enrolled members of Native American tribes who can now use their tribal ID as a valid form of identification at a polling place would be prohibited from using it to vote by mail. Aaron Payment, the vice president of the National Congress of American Indians, called the proposed mail-in voting requirement little more than “the haves wanting to prevent the have-nots from receiving the American Dream.” “Wealthy people have been filling out absentee ballots for a long time now, the privileged class has been doing it for generations,” Payment said Monday. “Now that lower-income and people of color are doing it and we’re watching politicians complain about it while they cast their absentee ballot.… It’s a special brand of American politics.” But, in Washington, witnesses and lawmakers at the House subcommittee hearing differed on the impact tighter election security laws have on voter access. Each of the nine witnesses cited studies or surveys to back up their case, with Republicans arguing that election security laws do not disenfranchise anyone when applied evenly, and Democrats arguing that color-blind application is rarely the case. Matt Barreto, a political science professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, said his studies have shown that white voters were statistically more likely to have the ID required for voting than any other racial or ethnic group in the country. Butterfield said that something as simple as the cost of getting a government-issued ID for voting – as well as that costs to get the documentation needed to apply for that ID – can pose financial barriers that prohibit minorities voters, who are otherwise eligible to vote, from casting a ballot.
Our statement on President Biden’s Executive Order on Promoting Access to Voting and the establishment of an Interagency Steering Group on Native American Voting Rights. Read the statement: https://t.co/xdqojhpyTG pic.twitter.com/LSLw14FEYN— National Congress of American Indians (@NCAI1944) March 8, 2021
Note: Thumbnail photo by Franco LaTona / Cronkite News
For more stories from Cronkite News, visit cronkitenews.azpbs.org.
Note: This story originally appeared on Cronkite News. It is published via a Creative Commons license. Cronkite News is produced by the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University.
Montana Free Press: Tribes hit with marijuana grow limits
Matthew Fletcher: U.S. Supreme Court disrupts criminal justice in Indian Country
Cronkite News: U.S. Supreme Court ruling called a ‘disaster’ for Indian Country
Native America Calling: Streaming Native stories
‘Oklahoma’s sovereignty and jurisdiction’: Outgoing Republican attorney general claims victory in U.S. Supreme Court case
‘A direct assault on tribal sovereignty’: Lawmaker calls for action to address U.S. Supreme Court ruling
‘An increase in violence against Native victims”: NIWRC raises alarms about U.S. Supreme Court decision
‘An attack on tribal sovereignty’: Tribal organizations respond to U.S. Supreme Court ruling
Crystal Echo Hawk: U.S. Supreme Court part of ‘anti-Native, anti-woman war’ across the country
Choctaw Nation weighs in on U.S. Supreme Court ruling in tribal sovereignty case
U.S. Attorneys vow to ‘enforce federal law in Indian Country’
Republican governor celebrates victory in U.S. Supreme Court case
Cherokee Nation Chief: U.S. Supreme Court ‘failed’ to honor promises to tribal nations
Muscogee Nation calls U.S. Supreme Court decision a ‘step backward’ for justice in Indian Country