Facebook Twitter Email
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2002

"The election is over, and Sen. Tim Johnson, D-S.D., was proclaimed the winner. It does bother me, however, that the irregularities and crimes committed in registering voters and paying people to vote on the Indian reservations are not getting the press that this serious situation deserves. Why is it necessary to read New York publications to find out anything about these issues?"

Get the Story:
Letter: Paper doesn't care (Terry L. Thorson. The Sioux Falls Argus Leader 11/27)

Related Stories:
S.D. AG disputes Wall Street Journal (11/21)
Letters: The Indians fought back (11/20)
Editorial: The South Dakota Indian Vote(11/20)
Editorials: The power of the Indian vote (11/18)
Narrow Johnson win in S.D. confirmed (11/13)
Indian voter turnout in S.D. was high (11/8)
Indian votes helped Johnson (11/7)
S.D. Indian vote was challenged (11/7)
S.D. Senate race 'too close to call' (11/6)
S.D. woman 'traced' signatures on forms (11/1)
No illegal ballots found in S.D. (10/31)
S.D. election night proposal questioned (10/30)
S.D. woman fights voter fraud charges (10/29)
S.D. voter fraud tied to one person (10/25)
Charges fly in S.D. Indian voter dispute (10/24)
Opinion: Don't let illiterate Indians vote (10/23)
All eyes on South Dakota for votes (10/22)
Charges of Indian voter fraud denied (10/18)
Editorial: Investigate voter fraud (10/18)
S.D. voter fraud probe continues (10/17)
'More and more' cases of voter fraud (10/16)
Thune: S.D. vote challenge not my idea (10/16)
Problems cited with Indian voter drive (10/15)
Native voters said key in S.D. races (09/02)
Sioux tribal members file voting rights suit (08/06)