Facebook Twitter Email
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2001

When the House passed a bill allowing for 2,000 acres of land in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to be open to oil and gas development, hardly anyone paid attention to exactly what that meant.

So The Anchorage Daily News tried to find out. Although the paper hasn't found a definitive answer, one thing is clear: oil companies could still develop all 1.5 million acres of ANWR's coastal plain because the limit only applies to the "surface" acreage of drilling facilities.

Get the Story:
2,000-acre query (The Anchorage Daily News 11/4)

Relevant Links:
Oil Issues in ANWR, US Fish and Wildlife - http://arctic.fws.gov/issues1.html
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Pro-Development site - http://www.anwr.org

Related Stories:
Murkowski: Not enough ANWR votes (11/5)
Off-shore driling tests Inupiats (11/2)
Democrats hold own ANWR conference (11/1)
Vets support Arctic drilling (10/31)
Interior won't release polar bear report (10/30)
Inupiats: ANWR oil needed to survive (10/26)
ASRC supporting anti-drilling complaint (10/26)
Norton says ANWR mistake corrected (10/26)
'Attack' on Gwich'in decried (10/24)
Norton admits ANWR 'mistake' (10/23)
Norton staff rewrote Arctic drilling data (10/19)
Arctic drilling debate continues (10/15)
Bush promotes ANWR as home security (10/12)
ANWR spared in defense vote (10/3)
House approves limited Arctic drilling (8/2)
Bush makes last-ditch pitch for Arctic drilling (8/1)
House panel approves Arctic drilling (7/18)
Gwich'in Nation blind-sided by Norton visit (6/15)
Norton: Indian Country won't get ripped off (5/24)
Alaska Natives square off over Arctic drilling (5/18)
Campbell: Alaska Natives support drilling (4/25)
Gwich'in Nation: We Come from the Caribou (4/4)
GOP Senators unveil drilling proposal (2/27)