FROM THE ARCHIVE
Response wanted on N.M. gaming suit
Facebook Twitter Email
THURSDAY, JANUARY 10, 2002

The New Mexico State Supreme Court has asked both sides of a gaming dispute to submit responses by January 22.

A Republican lawmakers has sued over the validity of compacts signed by Attorney General Patricia Madrid. Madrid says the suit is frivolous.

The compacts have been approved by the Department of Interior and cap the revenue sharing rate with the state at 8 percent. Previous compacts signed in 1997 had the rate of 16 percent.

All but two tribes have agreed to the new provisions. The Mescalero Apache Nation and Pojoaque Pueblo, are holding out.

Get the Story:
Court seeks response to gambling challenge (AP 1/10)

Related Stories:
Casino challenge not a worry to state (12/24)
N.M. lawmaker sues over gaming compacts (12/21)
Pueblo opening casino expansion (12/20)
N.M. compacts finally becoming legal (12/18)
N.M. gaming compacts almost legal (12/13)
Pueblo fighting gaming agreement (11/29)
N.M. compacts approved (11/26)
N.M. tribes want compact approved (11/16)
Mescalero Apache elect leaders (11/8)
N.M. has received $88M from tribes (10/29)
Acoma Pueblo makes gaming payment (10/16)
N.M. sends compacts to Interior (10/10)
N.M. casino settlement blocked (9/19)
Pueblo fights casino settlement (9/4)
Tribes, N.M. want $91M settlement cleared (8/28)
N.M. gaming compacts delayed (8/16)
N.M. tribes settle casino payments (8/10)
N.M. tribes make casino payment deal (8/9)
Pueblo reaches casino payment deal (8/8)
Pueblo casino operating on old compact (6/19)
Tribes, state can't agree on casino payments (5/30)
Pueblo spends all its profits (4/17)
N.M. tribes: $1B to state (3/15)
Gaming 'refund' bill moves along (3/14)
State wants casino back payments (2/23)
NM Tribes ordered to make casino payments (2/14)
NM Tribes may get new compacts (2/13)
Court: New Mexico tribes can be sued (12/8)
Gaming tribes ask for dismissal (8/15)
State sues tribes (6/14)