"It's time for a new consensus on gambling and its limits. In 1998 and 2000, voters backed Indian gambling. But the approvals came with a clear expectation: The gaming would be limited in scope and located primarily in rural locations where few other economic opportunities exist.

Now, with more than 50 casinos and 50,000 slots in operation, the pressure has grown to break this pledge. Ever-bigger gambling resorts are planned. Tribes are moving off remote locations to set up casinos closer to big cities. The business has morphed into a major statewide industry that could soon eclipse that of Nevada.

The vote on Tuesday carries a strong message: Californians are in no mood for a wholesale expansion of gambling, especially under lopsided rules written by insiders. The scale, locations, oversight and public financial returns need a fresh look."

Get the Story:
Editorial: House of cards (The San Francisco Chronicle 11/5)