Editorial: Gaming tribes flex power in California

Tuesday, September 16, 2008  

"When charities went up against casino-owning Indian tribes in Sacramento recently, they got schooled in who wields the real political power. The outcome raises serious questions about whether Californians meant to forever guarantee tribes that there would be no meaningful competition to their gambling operations.

A bill by Sen. Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) to allow nonprofit fundraisers to install electronic bingo machines was dropped right after tribes went to work against it, protesting that it would violate a pact with the state giving them the sole right to slot machines. Then, in the waning days of the legislative session, Sen. Gil Cedillo (D-Los Angeles) gutted a bill on school lunches and amended it to specifically forbid anyone besides the tribes from owning gambling machines.

Most gaming tribes gave their stamp of approval to the bill -- which also contained a sop to big charities by allowing them to increase their bingo prizes and link bingo players at separate venues via video -- and within two weeks of the new language's introduction, so did the Legislature.

It's more than a little troubling to see the haste with which lawmakers, who receive huge donations from tribes, rush to do their bidding. The state had been in the process of determining the legality of charity bingo machines, but Cedillo's bill would end that discussion. Californians should demand to see it reopened.

At the time the gaming pacts were made, bingo machines weren't commonly available. Now that they are, it raises the question of whether any new technological advances in gambling that represent competition to Indian tribes will be banned. If so, the state first needs an open and public debate on the issue, not a quickly packaged and wrapped gift to Indian gaming."

Get the Story:
Editorial: Indian power and gambling (The Los Angeles Times 9/15)
pwday