Casino Stalker | Land Acquisitions | Litigation

Trump administration given more time for appeal in tribal gaming case



Congratulations to the new Secretary of the Department of Interior Secretary Zinke. Secretary Zinke said to Me, "I am all about Tribal Sovereignty!" Hoka 💯

Posted by Re-Elect Cedric Cromwell, Mashpee Wampanoag Tribal Chairman on Thursday, March 2, 2017

Chairman Cedric Cromwell on Facebook: 'Congratulations to the new Secretary'

The new Trump administration has been given more time to consider an appeal in a closely-watched tribal gaming case.

Last summer, a federal judge ruled that the Bureau of Indian Affairs acted illegally when it approved a land-into-trust application submitted by the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe. The Massachusetts-based tribe, whose recognition was finalized in 2007, was not "under federal jurisdiction" in 1934 as required by the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Carcieri v. Salazar, the judge determined.

The tribe already filed an appeal but the Department of Justice, which is under new leadership, has not yet made the call one way or another. The Trump administration now has until April 27 to decide, according to news reports.

Although anything is possible, it would be unusual if the Trump team did not join the appeal. Just last week, Justice submitted a brief in a very similar land-into-trust case involving the Cowlitz Tribe and its casino in Washington state.

Both cases are based on the BIA's handling of Carcieri since 2009 but the Mashpees lost while the Cowlitz won. And the decisions in both cases were issued with a day of each other, albeit in different federal courts.

If the Mashpees succeed in their appeal, they plan to resume work on the $1 billion First Light Resort and Casino in the city of Taunton in Massachusetts.

The Cowlitz, on the other hand, are only a month away from debuting ilani Casino Resort in Washington.

Read More on the Story:
Fight over Mashpee tribe's land, casino continues in Trump era (The Cape Cod Times 3/14)
Judge Delays Opening Of Appeal On Tribal Land In Trust (CapeNews 3/15)

Federal Court Decisions:
District Court of Massachusetts: Littlefield v. Department of the Interior (July 28, 2016)
D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals: Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon v. Jewell (July 29, 2016)

Supreme Court Decision in Carcieri v. Salazar:
Syllabus | Opinion [Thomas] | Concurrence [Breyer] | Dissent [Stevens] | Concurrence/Dissent [Souter]

Department of the Interior Solicitor Opinion:
M-37029: The Meaning of "Under Federal Jurisdiction" for Purposes of the Indian Reorganization Act (March 12, 2014)

Related Stories:
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe enters new year with casino in limbo (01/02)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe casino in limbo amid change in DC (12/14)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe files notice of appeal in casino lawsuit (12/9)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe casino faces unknowns with Donald Trump in office (11/10)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe sees hope in casino land litigation (10/14)
Bureau of Indian Affairs faced pressure to approve gaming deal (09/29)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe granted role in casino land dispute (09/28)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe in limbo after decision on casino site (09/13)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe awaits word on role in casino lawsuit (08/31)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe hails bid to reconsider casino ruling (08/25)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe in high stakes fight for casino and land (08/22)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe files motion to join casino land dispute (8/16)
Opinion: Court decisions appear in conflict on tribal gaming rights (8/15)
Indian law experts debate outcomes in two land-into-trust cases (8/4)
Two tribes see conflicting rulings in long-running quests for casinos (8/2)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe continues work on casino despite ruling (8/1)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe sees setback in land-into-trust dispute (7/29)
Obama administration backs Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe casino bid (07/08)