The logo of the Aquinnah Cliffs Casino, the Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe's forthcoming gaming facility. Image: Aquinnah Cliffs Casino

Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe defends sovereignty in gaming case

The Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe is defending its sovereignty in a long-running gaming case in Massachusetts.

In a brief filed with the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals last week, the tribe asserted the right to open a Class II gaming facility on its reservation. The same court agreed with the tribe in an April 2017 decision.

But opponents on the island of Martha's Vineyard, where the reservation is located, haven't accepted the ruling. They went back to court and convinced a federal judge to force the tribe to seek local approval for the forthcoming Aquinnah Cliffs Casino.

An Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe boundary marker in Massachusetts. Photo: John Pittman

As a Class II facility, meaning one that offers bingo and electronic forms of bingo, Aquinnah Cliffs would not normally be subject to local or even state jurisdiction. According to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, such operations are subject to tribal and federal regulation -- states aren't involved.

Unless corrected by the 1st Circuit, the lower court's "decision will open the door for other states to assert jurisdiction over other tribes and the United States with regard to Class II gaming on Indian lands, unraveling IGRA’s thirty-year history of stable jurisdictional jurisprudence, and destabilizing the most significant source of revenue, by far, funding tribal governments," the brief asserts.

After winning the 2017 decision, the tribe lined up the Global Gaming Solutions, a subsidiary of the Chickasaw Nation, as a partner on the casino. The Chickasaws were a pioneer in Class II gaming in Oklahoma.

But efforts to construct the 10,000 square-foot facility were met with strong opposition from the town of Aquinnah. That opposition led to the negative ruling regarding local and state jurisdiction.

The judge in the case is F. Dennis Saylor IV. He previously found that the tribe could not exercise its gaming rights under IGRA -- an erroneous finding that was eventually reversed by the 1st Circuit.

“You were right and I was wrong,” Saylor said in court during a follow-up hearing in May 2019, The Martha's Vineyard Times reported at the time.

Briefing continues in the case. A hearing has not been scheduled, The Cape Cod Times reports.

Read More on the Story
Vineyard tribe appeals federal court ruling on bingo hall (The Cape Cod Times January 27, 2020)

1st Circuit Court of Appeals Decision
Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) (April 11, 2017)

Relevant Documents
Department of the Interior Letter to the National Indian Gaming Commission (August 23, 2013)
National Indian Gaming Commission Letter to Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe (October 25, 2013)
National Indian Gaming Commission Approval of Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe Class II Gaming Ordinance (August 14, 2018)

Join the Conversation

Related Stories
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe continues to fight for gaming rights (July 17, 2019)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe told to seek local permits to build casino (June 20, 2019)
'You were right and I was wrong': Judge concedes to Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe (May 31, 2019)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe back in court to defend gaming rights (May 6, 2019)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe starts construction on long-awaited gaming facility (February 25, 2019)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe asserts role in gaming talks in Massachusetts (January 28, 2019)
Democrats opposed bill to protect homelands of Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe (January 11, 2019)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe welcomes introduction of homelands legislation (January 9, 2019)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe aims to open casino in the summer (December 12, 2018)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe continues work on gaming project (October 17, 2018)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe solidifying plans for long-awaited casino (September 10, 2018)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe lands big partner for gaming project (August 22, 2018)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe still working on casino after court victory (July 20, 2018)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe moves forward with Class II gaming facility (January 11, 2018)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe hails win in long-running sovereignty case (January 10, 2018)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe scores big win in long-running sovereignty case (January 8, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe in limbo as Supreme Court delays sovereignty dispute (December 11, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe awaits action from Supreme Court in sovereignty case (November 28, 2017)
Casino opponents ask Supreme Court to hear Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe case (August 9, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe must wait to restart work on casino (May 23, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe hails another win in gaming dispute (May 12, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe sees more opposition to gaming win (April 25, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe must keep fighting despite gaming win (April 21, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe welcomes decision in gaming dispute (April 17, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanaog Tribe scores major win in sovereignty case (April 11, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe defends right to use land for gaming (December 7, 2016)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe elects new chair amid gaming fight(November 22, 2016)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe gets court date in gaming lawsuit(October 26, 2016)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe sees support for Class II gaming plan(June 6, 2016)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe submits first brief in gaming appeal (6/1)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe asks 1st Circuit to hear gaming case (02/03)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe to finish center as casino bid falters (1/29)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe permanently barred from casino work (01/06)
Tribes with special acts of Congress face hurdles for gaming (11/24)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe to appeal decision in casino case (11/23)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe sees major blow in casino case (11/16)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe deadlocks on gaming referendum (08/17)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe argues for gaming rights in court (8/13)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe to vote on Class II casino project (8/12)
Obama on holiday amid Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe casino flap (8/11)
Editorial: Something's gotta give in New England casino race (08/03)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe sees big future with Class II casino (07/31)
Judge orders Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe to stop work on casino (7/29)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe wins approval for liquor ordinance (7/27)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe owes HUD for casino building (7/24)
Members of Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe debate casino bid (7/21)
Massachusetts tribes still trying to get into the casino game (7/20)
Judge sets hearing in Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe casino case (7/15)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe faces court action over casino bid (7/14)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe might stop work on Class II project (7/13)
Editorial: Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe's wrong approach on casino (7/9)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe ignores order to stop working on casino (7/7)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe told to stop working on gaming facility (7/6)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe starts work on Class II gaming facility (7/3)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe pushes for decision in casino litigation (06/08)
Editorial: Group fights Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe casino plan (03/12)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe hails decision in gaming dispute (3/4)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe and state in court over casino plan (3/3)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe acquires land adjacent to casino site (01/07)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe heads back to court in casino dispute (01/06)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe responds to opponents in casino suit (08/28)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe seeking investors for Class II facility (08/25)
Judge allows parties in Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe casino case (08/07)