Six years after taking two trust cases to the U.S. Supreme Court
, the Bush administration is again asking the high court to limit the federal government's fiduciary responsibilities.
In a petition filed last Tuesday, the Department of Justice
sought review of one of the longest-running and most controversial breach of trust cases. The Navajo Nation
says it was cheated out of at least $600 million in royalties for one of the most valuable coal deposits in the U.S.
The facts behind the case are well known. During the Reagan administration, the Bureau of Indian Affairs
approved a lease with a lower royalty rate for the tribe after a lobbyist for Peabody Coal
, the world's largest coal company, convinced then-Interior Department
secretary Don Hodel to intervene.
Hodel was a personal friend of the lobbyist. Ross Swimmer, who now serves as head of the Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians
, ran the BIA when the lease was approved.
After a lengthy battle, the tribe won a favorable ruling before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
in August 2001. A three-judge panel ruled that Interior violated the "most basic common law fiduciary duties owned to the Navajo Nation," by approving the lease.
But the Bush administration appealed the ruling, along with another one that favored the White Mountain Apache Tribe
of Arizona. Both cases were heard by the Supreme Court in December 2002, though the outcomes were different.
In the Navajo case, the justices ruled by a 6-3 vote that the tribe failed to prove Interior's actions violated federal law. The court, by a slim 5-4 margin, ruled that the Apache tribe was owed money for trust property that fell into disrepair.
Despite the negative ruling in the Navajo case, the dispute didn't end there. The March 2003 opinion only affected the tribe's case under the Indian Mineral Leasing Act and the Indian Mineral Development Act.
On remand, the Federal Circuit ruled that the tribe's case survived under a "network" of other federal laws. The September 2007 decision also said Interior's approval violated common law trust duties.
"Accordingly, this court holds that the nation has a cognizable money-mandating claim against the United States for the alleged breaches of trust and that the government breached its trust duties," Judge Arthur J. Gajarsa
, a Clinton nominee, wrote in the 39-page ruling.
In its petition for review, government lawyers say the Federal Circuit got it wrong. The May 13 brief, which was signed by outgoing Solicitor
General Paul D. Clement
, says the court relied on laws "that have nothing to do with royalty rates for mineral leases and common law trust principles not embodied in any statute or regulation."
The brief argues that the Supreme Court's ruling foreclosed the tribe's victory in the case. For that reason alone, the government says the Federal Circuit decision should be overturned.
But the brief also says the Federal Circuit engaged in a "vast expansion" of the favorable White Mountain Apache ruling. Unless the Supreme Court addresses the dispute, the Bush administration claims Interior employees will have a cloud over their shoulder every time they make trust-related decisions.
"Beyond its impact on damage claims that are already pending, the decision below introduces grave uncertainty into the Interior Department's day-to-day activities carried out by thousands of Departmental employees nationwide," Clement wrote. "The decision improperly superimposes on the substantive and procedural framework established under applicable statutes and regulations a broad and amorphous set
of trust principles whose precise content cannot be known in any particular context in advance."
The government has made similar arguments in a slew of trust cases but the courts so far have rejected that line of defense. When the Navajo and Apache cases were being reviewed, the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians
that showed the dollar value of most successful breach of trust cases was actually very low.
The Navajo case, though, is considered one of the largest potential claims. With interest and damages, the tribe could be awarded over a billion dollars.
The tribe's response to the petition is due by June 12.
Supreme Court Documents:
Sheet: No. 07-1410
Petition for Certiorari
Federal Circuit Decision:Navajo Nation v.
(September 13, 2007)
Supreme Court Decision in US v. Navajo Nation
Related Supreme Court Decision in US v. White Mountain Apache Tribe
Related Stories:Court: Navajo Nation owed money for bungled lease
(9/14)Navajo Nation weighs trust
lawsuit before deadline
Navajo chair issues challenge on Peabody
(5/4)DOI office concludes field hearings on Peabody
(01/20) Top Interior official
resigns from Bush administration
(12/08) Peabody takes coal lease dispute to high court
(12/01) Peabody loses another round in
Navajo coal lease fight
seek conditional permit for generation station
(6/15)Grassroots battle against Peabody sees success
(06/07) Judge won't dismiss Navajo Nation
suit against Peabody
continues top-level access at Interior
(3/17)Court opens window for Navajo Nation trust
seeks to dismiss Navajo Nation claim
(06/18)Court appears ready to toss Peabody
Court's trust rulings criticized
(4/14) Navajo Nation back in court over
(4/8) Effects of Supreme Court decision
ruling makes 'passive' trustee of U.S.
(3/5) A mixed bag for Indian trust
Supreme Court issues trust
can't recall Navajo involvement
(02/13)Panel predicts Apache victory
(12/4) Navajo 'deception'
gets Supreme Court hearing
(12/03)Peabody sides with Bush
administration on trust
(09/04)Legal tactics land Peabody in hot
(7/22) Navajo royalty
Hodel's Navajo Folly
(6/4) Supreme Court accepts Navajo trust
(6/3) Navajo royalty
case up for review
(5/30) Supreme Court considers 'deception'
on Navajo trust case
(5/20)Bush wants Navajo ruling reversed
(3/27)Court rules Navajo Nation