Law
Turtle Talk: Navajos not laughing after hearing
"As could be predicted, the oral argument in United States v. Navajo Nation (transcript) did not go very well for the respondents. Adam Liptak noted that Justice Ginsburg showed unusual vigor in suggesting to Carter Phillips that her 2003 majority opinion in Navajo Nation I foreclosed any chance for a monetary award, implying that the first decision covered any possible relevant openings for the Nation.

And that’s how Acting SG Ed Kneedler opened, by arguing that the questions presented in Navajo I included all possible statutes that could generate an award-generating cause of action for the Nation. Before the Acting SG concluded his opening portion of the argument, Justice Ginsburg on page 18 was asking Mr. Kneedler the proper course of action once the Court rules in favor of the government. See Transcript page 18, lines 4-7. Kneedler suggested a reversal and a dismissal of the complaint below. No more remands, something perhaps the Court forgot to do before.

The Navajo Nation’s attorney, Carter Phillips, is a gas, but I suspect the Navajos aren’t laughing. I think he knew his side never had much of a chance. He made several jokes, including one about needing a haircut to explain why he used a barber shop hypothetical (p. 28, no one laughed), repeated jokes about the testimony of former Interior Secretary Udall (p. 40-41, 46, which did elicit laughter), and one joke that appeared to be about the unusual character of this case — that the Navajos lost below, and came up with a new theory (p. 40, more laughter)."

Get the Story:
Commentary on the Navajo Nation Oral Argument (Turtle Talk 2/24)

Supreme Court Documents:
Oral Argument Transcript | Docket Sheet: No. 07-1410 | Brief: Former Interior Secretaries | Brief: New Mexico, Arizona and Utah | Brief: Law Professors | More: NCAI-NARF Tribal Supreme Court Project

Federal Circuit Decision:
Navajo Nation v. US (September 13, 2007)

March 2003 Supreme Court Decision in US v. Navajo Nation:
Syllabus | Opinion [Ginsburg] | Dissent [Souter]

Related Stories:
Ginsburg returns to Supreme Court after surgery (2/24)
Navajo Nation sees support on Supreme Court case (02/04)
Government files first brief in Navajo trust case (12/03)
Navajo Nation trust case on Supreme Court docket again (10/02)
Supreme Court to hear Navajo Nation trust case (10/1)
Supreme Court considers Indian law cases (9/30)
SCOTUSBlog: Supreme Court petitions to watch (09/19)
Bush seeks review of long-running Navajo trust case (5/19)
Court: Navajo Nation owed money for bungled lease (9/14)
Peabody takes coal lease dispute to high court (12/01)
Peabody loses another round in Navajo coal lease fight (6/16)
Judge won't dismiss Navajo Nation suit against Peabody (04/27)
Peabody continues top-level access at Interior (3/17)
Court opens window for Navajo Nation trust suit (10/27)
Court appears ready to toss Peabody appeal (04/15)
Supreme Court's trust rulings criticized (4/14)
Navajo Nation back in court over Peabody lease (4/8)
Effects of Supreme Court decision debated (03/07)
High court ruling makes 'passive' trustee of U.S. (3/5)
A mixed bag for Indian trust (3/5)

This story is tagged under:
Search
Share this Story!

You are enjoying stories from the Indianz.Com Archive, a collection dating back to 2000. Some outgoing links may no longer work due to age.

All stories in the Indianz.Com Archive are available for publishing via Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)