Editorial: Stronger safeguards needed for offshore development
"The six-month anniversary of the BP oil spill passed quietly last week. The well has been capped, and commerce in the Gulf of Mexico is slowly reviving. Much important work still lies ahead — figuring out how much oil is still out there, cleaning it up, measuring the damage to marine life, compensating victims. And Congress needs to pass an oil-spill bill that will reduce the chances of another drilling debacle.

The House has passed a bill that would tighten environmental safeguards, require companies to furnish detailed response plans before receiving drilling permits, and reorganize the government to prevent the conflicts of interest that helped lead to the BP spill. When it returns after the election, the Senate must do the same.

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar has already issued useful new rules. But these are administrative changes that could be rolled back by another administration. Congress can provide the force of law. The Senate could also improve on the House bill in one important respect by ensuring a robust source of funds to rebuild an ecosystem that was already in deep trouble before the spill."

Get the Story:
Editorial: After the Spill (The New York Times 10/25)

Related Stories:
Alaska Natives criticize new analysis on drilling in Arctic Ocean (10/13)
Editorial: Withhold off-shore drilling leases in Arctic Ocean (5/26)
MMS official in charge of offshore drilling to retire on May 31 (05/18)
Alaska Native village concerned about offshore development (5/17)
Editorial: Putting off shore drilling in Alaska on hold for now (5/12)
Interior plans to create separate royalty collection agency (5/12)
Column: Bad history for oil agency at Interior Department (5/10)
Johnny Flynn: Oil development one of the most dangerous (5/6)
Obama calls oil spill in Gulf of Mexico a 'massive' disaster (5/3)
DOI delays decision on off-shore drilling in Alaska (11/20)
Offshore drilling allowed in Native whaling area (10/20)