The Nooksack Tribe’s undisputed right to determine its own citizenship is not, however, the only right at stake. The fundamental human rights of the Nooksack 306 also weigh heavily in the balance. Under Article 9 of the UN Declaration, “indigenous peoples and individuals have the right to belong to an indigenous community or nation, in accordance with the tradition and customs of the community or nation concerned. No discrimination of any kind may arise from the exercise of such a right” (emphasis added). Similarly, Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (“ICCPR”), a binding treaty ratified by the United States in 1992, mandates that “[i]n those States where ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities exist, persons belonging to such minorities shall not be denied the right, in community with the other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practice their own religion, or to use their own language” (emphasis added). To illustrate, in Lovelace v. Canada, the UN Human Rights Committee, which monitors ICCPR implementation, found that Canada’s Indian Act violated Article 27 by terminating an indigenous woman’s tribal citizenship when she married a non-indigenous man. The Lovelace decision confirms that, under international law, indigenous individuals have a right to live in community with their fellow tribal people and that this right is critical to maintaining indigenous identity and culture.Get the Story:
Akilah Kinnison: Fighting Disenrollment: The Nooksack 306 (Indian Country Today 10/8)
Related Stories
Opinion: Put end to
disenrollment disputes in Indian Country (09/30) KUOW: Protest against disenrollments within Nooksack Tribe (09/23)
Nooksack Tribe barred from mass disenrollment proceedings (08/28)
Nooksack Tribe set to begin mass disenrollments this week (8/26)
Nooksack Tribe will move forward with mass disenrollments (8/21)
KUOW: Court stops Nooksack Tribe from removing 306 people (8/16)
Join the Conversation
