The Bureau of Indian Affairs
released the long-awaited Part 83 reforms
to the federal recognition process on Monday amid Congressional opposition.
The final rule
will be published in the Federal Register
officials said it will speed up a process that takes decades to complete and has become costly for the BIA, petitioning groups and interested parties.
"This updated process for important tribal recognition makes good on a promise to clarify, expedite and honor a meaningful process for federal acknowledgement to our First Americans," Interior Secretary Sally Jewell said in a press release
“This updated rule is the product of extraordinary input from tribal leaders, states, local governments and the public,” added Assistant Secretary Kevin Washburn, the head of the BIA.
The final regulation differs from the proposed rule in two significant ways. First, the BIA will rely on 1900 as the starting date for evaluating petitioning groups rather than 1934.
"[B]ased on its experience in nearly 40 years of implementing the regulations, every group that has proven its existence from 1900 forward has successfully proven its existence prior to that time as well, making 1900 to the present a reliable proxy for all of history but at less expense," the BIA explained.
The final rule also does not allow groups that already went through the process to submit new petitions. Members of Congress, some state and local officials and even some federally-recognized tribes objected to the controversial provision that was in the original proposal.
"After reviewing the comments both in support of and in opposition to allowing for any opportunity for re-petitioning, limiting re-petitioning by providing for third-party input, and other suggested approaches for re-petitioning, the department has determined that allowing re-petitioning is not appropriate," the BIA said.
"Allowing for re-petitioning by denied petitioners would be unfair to petitioners who have not yet had a review, and would hinder the goals of increasing efficiency and timeliness by imposing the additional workload associated with re-petitions," the BIA added.
Even though the final rule has been scaled back, Republicans on Capitol Hill are trying to block it anyway. H.R.2822
the fiscal year 2016 Interior appropriations bill, prevents the BIA from using federal funds to "implement, administer, or enforce" the reforms that have been years in the making.
began consideration of the bill last Thursday before going on a break this week. The Senate
version of the Interior appropriations measure
does not address the rule so any differences would have to be addressed later in legislative process.
The BIA's federal acknowledgment process
formally began in 1978. Since then, only 17 groups have won recognition while 34 have been denied, underscoring the difficult nature of the process.
The tribes that are successful waited decades and spent millions of dollars
documenting their cases. For those in the Northeast, where the time of first contact dates to the 1600s, the process has become extremely cumbersome.
The Shinnecock Nation
of New York was the fourth group to submit a petition in 1978. But the final answer didn't come until October 2010.
The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe
of Massachusetts also endured a lengthy wait
after first seeking federal status in 1975. The BIA issued its final decision in May 2007.
The Shinnecock Nation and the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe were the last two tribes to secure recognition through the BIA.
New regulation makes it easier for Indian tribes to get federal recognition
Federal Register Notices:Federal
Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes
(July 30, 2014)Federal
Acknowledgment of American Indian Tribes
(May 29, 2014)
Part 83 Reform Documents:
| Press Release
| Comparison Chart (comparing current rule to proposed rule)
to Comments on June 2013 Discussion Draft
Join the Conversation
blocks BIA's federal recognition reforms
(06/16)Appropriations report sounds alarm about
(6/15) No movement on reform of
federal recognition process at BIA
(05/04)Editorial: States need help
dealing with newly recognized tribes
(04/27)BIA faces fire over latest reforms to federal
(4/23) BIA submits
federal recognition rule to White House for review
(4/21) House subcommittee to hold hearing on BIA
(4/20) Lawmakers want BIA to delay
new federal recognition reforms
(03/27)BIA expected to finalize changes to federal
(3/24) Aura Bogado: BIA tries to
reform troubled recognition system
(10/15)Editorial: Connecticut tribes should document
history to 1789
(10/13) Editorial: BIA shouldn't
weaken standards for federal recognition
(10/06)BIA ends comment period on reform to federal
(10/1) BIA holds final meetings on
reforms to federal recognition process
(09/02)County hires lobbying firm to
oppose federal recognition reforms
(08/28)Connecticut officials want
meeting on federal recognition reforms
(08/12)California county opposes
changes to federal recognition rules
(08/11)Editorial: BIA fails to
explain need for federal recognition reform
(08/01)Tribes criticize veto
provisions in BIA federal recognition rule
(07/30)BIA holds final in-person
meeting on federal recognition reform
(07/29)BIA extends comment period on federal recognition
(7/25) BIA opens meetings on changes
to federal recognition process