Trailer for By Blood documentary about Cherokee Freedmen controversy.
Judge and professor Steve Russell, a member of the Cherokee Nation, discusses the Freedmen citizenship controversy within the Oklahoma tribe:
The claim for disenrolling the Cherokee freedmen in modern times is that “all the rights of native Cherokees” did not include citizenship. That is, the disenrollment advocates claim that the real choice for the freedmen was to be U.S. citizens or not be citizens of any nation on the earth, an absurd result. At that time, Indians were not U.S. citizens for most purposes. They could at will move from the status of “Indians not taxed” to “Indians taxed” by quitting their tribe, but that would not gain them the right to vote in U.S. elections. Some non-lawyers have complained that the treaty ending the Civil War was invalid because it was “dictated” by the victorious nation. There are two problems with that. One is that the records of the negotiation show no objection by the Cherokee to absorbing the freedmen. The other is that if dictation of terms by the victor made a treaty void, no war would ever end by treaty. By Cherokee tribal court decision, the citizenship of the freedmen was reaffirmed in 2006. The opinion was carefully reasoned and covered the modern history of Cherokee citizenship.
Freedmen descendants protest outside a Bureau of Indian Affairs office in Muskogee, Oklahoma. File photo from Marilyn Vann, the president of the Descendants Of Freedmen Of The Five Civilized Tribes
In response, a group of Cherokees undertook by referendum to amend the Cherokee Nation Constitution to limit which part of the Dawes Rolls one’s ancestor had to be on to support modern citizenship. The effect of this amendment would be to expel approximately 2,662 black Cherokees and eight white Cherokees. Delaware and Shawnee Cherokees were retained. In 2007, “The Cherokee people” voted in a special election called by the chief rather than in a general election. In the last federal Census prior to that election, 729,533 individuals claimed to be Cherokee-American. About 268,000 of them were tribal citizens at the time, and three-quarters of those were of less than one-fourth Cherokee blood. The turnout in the special election was 8,743 of about 35,000 registered voters, of which 6,702 voted to disenroll their follow citizens. By comparison, the last Cherokee general election turnout had been 13,914. This engineered election is used to argue that the Cherokee Nation has voted to abrogate a treaty with the U.S., something an Indian nation can do just like any other nation if it does not mind abandoning the moral high ground of being the aggrieved party in every other abrogation of an Indian treaty.Get the Story:
Steve Russell: Disappearing Indians, Part II: The Hypocrisy of Race In Deciding Who’s Enrolled (Indian Country Today 7/28) Related Stories:
Documentary about Freedmen struggle premieres in Oklahoma (06/18)
House moves quickly on bill to renew Indian housing programs (03/24)
Dan Littlefield: Freedmen deserve Cherokee Nation citizenship (07/15)
Radio: Cherokee Freedmen cite treaty in fight over citizenship (06/16)
Courtland Milloy: Cherokee Nation seeking to exclude Freedmen (05/07)
Federal judge hears arguments in Cherokee Freedmen dispute (5/6)
Federal judge reschedules hearing for Cherokee Freedmen case (04/07)
Cherokee Freedmen eager for court hearing in citizenship case (03/10)
Obama supports Freedmen in dispute with Cherokee Nation (02/03)
Judge sets oral arguments in Cherokee Nation Freedmen suit (9/18)