Klamath Tribes oppose Dollar General store due to court challenge

Representatives of the National Indigenous Women’s Resource Center send a message to Dollar General for opposing tribal court jurisdiction. Photo from NIWRC

The Klamath Tribes of Oregon are taking a stand against a proposed Dollar General store in the community.

A letter from Chairman Don Gentry cited Dollar General Corporation v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, a case that was heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on December 7, 2015. A decision hasn't been issued but the publicly-traded company, which reported $18.9 billion in net sales in 2014, is refusing to submit to the jurisdiction of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians despite operating a store on trust land under an agreement with the tribe.

"A company with integrity would not agree to jurisdiction in a lease, and then disregard its legal agreement and spend over a decade litigation the issue," Gentry said in the letter to the mayor and council in Chiloquin.

Dollar General needs city and county approval to open the store in Chiloquin, The Klamath Falls Herald and News reported. City officials are seeking public opinion before moving forward, the paper said.

The Supreme Court heard the case prior to the passing of Justice Antonin Scalia. His death could tip the scales in favor of the Mississippi Band, John Dossett, the general counsel of the National Congress of American Indians said at the organization's winter session in Washington, D.C., last week.

Get the Story:
Klamath Tribes opposes Dollar General (The Klamath Falls Herald and News 2/28)

Join the Conversation

Relevant Documents:
Transcript: Dollar General v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians (December 7, 2015)

Related Stories
Updates from Day 2 of National Congress of American Indians winter session in D.C. (02/24)
No Supreme Court opinions this week following Scalia's death (02/22)
Mississippi Choctaw family seeks $2.5M in Dollar General case (12/11)
Matthew Fletcher: Supreme Court takes up tribal jurisdiction case (12/8)
Native women rally at Supreme Court for tribal jurisdiction case (12/7)
Steven Newcomb: Supreme Court ready to cut sovereignty again (12/7)
Peter d'Errico: Anti-Indian forces play hardball in Supreme Court (12/7)
Mike Myers: Tribal jurisdiction opponents flock to Supreme Court (12/04)
Native women schedule Quilt Walk for Justice at Supreme Court (12/01)
Steven Newcomb: Language of domination persists in Indian law (12/1)
Steven Newcomb: Even the media treats our nations as 'nothing' (11/27)
Ned Blackhawk: Supreme Court case jeopardizes tribal rights (11/25)
Peter d'Errico: Anti-Indian wars continue in our Supreme Court (11/24)
Native women to rally at Supreme Court for upcoming case (11/11)
DOJ to help with arguments in Supreme Court jurisdiction case (11/09)
Native women defend tribal jurisdiction in Supreme Court case (10/26)
Tribes urged to bring states on board for Supreme Court case (10/20)
Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribal Tribune: Supreme Court case tests tribal jurisdiction (10/14)
Supreme Court schedules oral arguments in two Indian law cases (10/12)
States oppose tribal jurisdiction in upcoming Supreme Court case (10/07)
Supreme Court rejects petitions in four more Indian law cases (10/05)
Supreme Court agrees to hear Omaha Reservation boundary case (10/02)
Supreme Court considers petitions in slew of Indian law cases (09/22)
Bryan Newland: The racist foundation of Supreme Court rulings (09/08)
Supreme Court agrees to hear first tribal jurisdiction case in years (06/15)
Supreme Court needs more time to review tribal jurisdiction case (6/8)
SCOTUSBlog: DOJ urges denial of petition in tribal court dispute (05/20)
DOJ files brief in tribal jurisdiction case before Supreme Court (5/14)
Updates from National Congress of American Indians DC meeting (2/27)
Updates from National Congress of American Indians winter session (2/26)
Supreme Court asks DOJ for views in Mississippi Choctaw case (10/06)