Law | National | Politics

Chair of Sault Ste. Marie Tribe calls for action on court nominee






Aaron Payment, the chairman of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians speaks at the White House Tribal Nations Conference in Washington, D.C, on November 5, 2015. Still image from White House / YouTube

Members of the Senate have a constitutional duty to convene hearings on U.S. Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, the leader of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians said on Thursday.

Top Republicans like Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky), the Senate majority leader, and Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) , the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, are refusing to consider Garland. They want the winner of the November presidential election to fill the vacancy on the nation's highest court.

“The next justice could fundamentally alter the direction of the Supreme Court and have a profound impact on our country, so of course the American people should have a say in the court’s direction," McConnell said in a statement.

But Aaron Payment, the chairman of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe, said their stance defies the U.S. Constitution. He is urging Indian Country to contact Senators and call for hearings.

"By failing to hold nomination hearings, these Senators are threatening to drastically alter our Constitution," Payment said. "Not through the amendment process, but in a helter-skelter manner that would enable them (not the people of the United States) to pick and choose which portions of the Constitution they want to follow."


Indianz.Com SoundCloud: White House Conference Call on Supreme Court Nominee Merrick Garland

With a record four Indian law cases on the docket, Payment previously stressed the importance of filling the vacancy left by the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. Decisions are pending in three cases that will affect tribal courts, tribal jurisdiction and protections for Native women.

The court can function with 8 members but waiting until the next president enters office in January 2017 and then waiting for him or her to nominate a replacement could result in unusual delays. Ties in any particular case will likely lead to a rehearing with a full slate of 9 justices.

In announcing Merrick's nomination, the White House unveiled the official SCOTUSnom Twitter account. One of the first posts notes that every Supreme Court nominee since 1875 has received a hearing or vote.

During a conference call with reporters on Wednesday, White House officials also said it would be unprecedented for Senate Republicans to refuse to allow a vote on Merrick. He was confirmed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in March 1997 with bipartisan support.

The D.C. Circuit hears a significant number of Indian law cases and Garland has participated in some important ones. However, he has never written a majority opinion in the Indian law cases that came before him.

Also Today:
Why Sen. Mitch McConnell won’t budge on the Supreme Court nomination (The Washington Post 3/16)
What picking a white, male, moderate Harvard grad for the Supreme Court says about Obama’s legacy (The Washington Post 3/16)
Some Senate Republicans Will Meet With Supreme Court Nominee (The New York Times 3/17)
Obama Chooses Merrick Garland for Supreme Court (The New York Times 3/17)
Merrick Garland’s Path to Nomination Marked by Deference, With Limits (The New York Times 3/17)

Related Stories:
Supreme Court nominee comes with some Indian law experience (3/16)
Editorial: Scales of justice often lean wrong way for Indian people (3/15)
Alaska Natives seek fair consideration of Supreme Court nominee (3/14)
Supreme Court schedules hearing in Indian domestic violence case (3/11)
Diane Humetewa not under consideration for Supreme Court seat (3/11)
Gyasi Ross: Nominate Diane Humetewa to serve on Supreme Court (3/9)
Dollar General defends plan to open in majority Native community (03/08)
Joe Biden: Senate Republicans must act on pick for Supreme Court (03/04)
Klamath Tribes oppose Dollar General store due to court challenge (03/01)
Aaron Payment: Tribal sovereignty hangs in the balance at Supreme Court (02/29)
Steve Russell: Looking for an unbiased justice on Supreme Court (02/29)
Steven Newcomb: Justice Scalia didn't know anything about Indian law (02/26)
Updates from Day 2 of National Congress of American Indians winter session in D.C. (02/24)
Barack Obama: What I'm looking for in a Supreme Court nominee (02/24)
Senate Republicans refuse to consider Supreme Court nominee (2/24)
No Supreme Court opinions this week following Scalia's death (2/22)
Supreme Court delays work due to ceremony for Justice Scalia (2/19)
April Youpee-Roll: Supreme Court makes up Indian law decisions (2/18)
Peter d'Errico: Justice Antonin Scalia scorned tribal sovereignty (2/18)
Linda Greenhouse: A chance to reset a partisan Supreme Court (2/18)
President Obama affirms intent to fill vacancy on Supreme Court (2/17)
Matthew Fletcher: Tribes couldn't count on Justice Scalia's vote (2/17)
David Wilkins: Justice Antonin Scalia leaves an anti-tribal record (2/17)
Stakes raised as Supreme Court weighs domestic violence case (2/16) Appeals court backs tougher sentence in domestic violence case (2/16)
Steve Russell: Justice Antonin Scalia was wrong about Indian law (2/15)
Justice Antonin Scalia dies with Indian law cases on the docket (2/13)
John Lavelle: Supreme Court weighs key tribal sovereignty issue (02/10)
Supreme Court declines NAGPRA case affecting Kumeyaay Nation (01/25)
Menominee Nation loses contract support costs case at Supreme Court (01/25)
Supreme Court hears Omaha Tribe reservation boundary dispute (01/20)
Ex-US Attorney welcomes review of domestic violence case (12/17)
Supreme Court agrees to review yet another Indian law dispute (12/14)
Native women rally at Supreme Court for key tribal jurisdiction case (12/07)
Native women schedule Quilt Walk for Justice at Supreme Court (12/01)
Native women to rally at Supreme Court for upcoming case (11/11)
DOJ to help with arguments in Supreme Court jurisdiction case (11/09)
Native women defend tribal jurisdiction in Supreme Court case (10/26)
Tribes urged to bring states on board for Supreme Court case (10/20)
Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribal Tribune: Supreme Court case tests tribal jurisdiction (10/14)
Supreme Court schedules oral arguments in two Indian law cases (10/12)
States oppose tribal jurisdiction in upcoming Supreme Court case (10/07)
Supreme Court rejects petitions in four more Indian law cases (10/05)
Supreme Court agrees to hear Omaha Reservation boundary case (10/02)
Supreme Court considers petitions in slew of Indian law cases (09/22)
Bryan Newland: The racist foundation of Supreme Court rulings (09/08)
Supreme Court agrees to hear first tribal jurisdiction case in years (06/15)
Supreme Court needs more time to review tribal jurisdiction case (6/8)
SCOTUSBlog: DOJ urges denial of petition in tribal court dispute (05/20)
DOJ files brief in tribal jurisdiction case before Supreme Court (5/14)
Updates from National Congress of American Indians DC meeting (2/27)
Updates from National Congress of American Indians winter session (2/26)
Supreme Court asks DOJ for views in Mississippi Choctaw case (10/06)