Law | National | Politics

Supreme Court pick puts some Indian law cases on questionnaire






President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and Judge Merrick Garland in the Oval Office. Photo by Pete Souza / White House

U.S. Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland submitted a 141-page questionnaire to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday.

Garland is the chief judge of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears a significant number of Indian law cases. But he's never written a majority opinion in any of the biggest disputes that came before him.

However, Garland listed one closely-watched case that made it to the Supreme Court. He was part of the panel that decided Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. US.

In September 2014, the D.C. Circuit held that the Menominee Nation of Wisconsin waited too long to bring certain contract support claims against the Indian Health Service. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision issued in January, upheld that finding.

Garland listed a second case that didn't garner as much attention. In Ramapough Mountain Indians v. Norton, the D.C. Circuit rejected an attempt by the Ramapough Lunaape Nation of New Jersey to gain federal recognition after its petition was rejected by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The Supreme Court did not accept the tribe's petition, putting an end to the litigation. But Garland put the case on his questionnaire because he was asked to list every case in which a petition for certiorari was requested or granted.

Garland has participated in other Indian law cases like the infamous Febraury 2007 decision that opened tribes to the National Labor Relations Act. But since the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians did not file a petition with the Supreme Court, it didn't make it into the questionnaire.

Garland did provide a separate list of the "10 most significant opinions" he has written. But none of them were Indian law cases because he hasn't written a majority opinion in an Indian law case.

The questionnaire was submitted as part of the confirmation process but Senate Republicans have said they will not advance Garland's nomination. They want to wait until after the November presidential election.

Get the Story:
White House sends high-court pick’s questionnaire to Senate (AP 5/10)
The latest push to confirm Merrick Garland: A 141-page questionnaire (The Washington Post 5/10)
Merrick Garland Completes Nominee Questionnaire for the Senate (The New York Times 5/10)

Supreme Court Decision:
Menominee Tribe of Wisconsin v. United States (January 25, 2015)

Supreme Court Documents:
Oral Argument Transcript | Question Presented

DC Circuit Court of Appeals Decision:
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin v. USA (September 2, 2014)

Related Stories:
Vacancy on Supreme Court already impacts high-profile cases (03/30)
Leader of Navajo Nation pushes for action on Supreme Court pick (03/22)
Chair of Sault Ste. Marie Tribe calls for action on court nominee (03/17)
Supreme Court nominee comes with some Indian law experience (03/16)
Alaska Natives seek fair consideration of Supreme Court nominee (03/14)
Diane Humetewa not under consideration for Supreme Court seat (3/11)
Gyasi Ross: Nominate Diane Humetewa to serve on Supreme Court (3/9)
Joe Biden: Senate Republicans must act on pick for Supreme Court (03/04)
Aaron Payment: Tribal sovereignty hangs in the balance at Supreme Court (02/29)
Steve Russell: Looking for an unbiased justice on Supreme Court (02/29)
Steven Newcomb: Justice Scalia didn't know anything about Indian law (02/26)
Steve Russell: Looking for an unbiased justice on Supreme Court (02/29)
Steven Newcomb: Justice Scalia didn't know anything about Indian law (02/26)
Updates from Day 2 of National Congress of American Indians winter session in D.C. (02/24)
Barack Obama: What I'm looking for in a Supreme Court nominee (02/24)
Senate Republicans refuse to consider Supreme Court nominee (2/24)
No Supreme Court opinions this week following Scalia's death (2/22)
Supreme Court delays work due to ceremony for Justice Scalia (2/19)
April Youpee-Roll: Supreme Court makes up Indian law decisions (2/18)
Peter d'Errico: Justice Antonin Scalia scorned tribal sovereignty (2/18)
Linda Greenhouse: A chance to reset a partisan Supreme Court (2/18)
President Obama affirms intent to fill vacancy on Supreme Court (2/17)
Matthew Fletcher: Tribes couldn't count on Justice Scalia's vote (2/17)
David Wilkins: Justice Antonin Scalia leaves an anti-tribal record (2/17)
Stakes raised as Supreme Court weighs domestic violence case (2/16)
Steve Russell: Justice Antonin Scalia was wrong about Indian law (2/15)
Justice Antonin Scalia dies with Indian law cases on the docket (2/13)
Menominee Nation loses contract support costs case at Supreme Court (01/25)