The Trump administration has closed an unprecedented public comment period on a number of national monuments, including one of great interest in Indian Country.
According to Secretary Ryan Zinke
, the Department of the Interior
received more than 1.4 million comments as of Monday. when the review ended. Almost all were submitted online at Regulations.gov
while others were mailed in.
“Too often under previous administrations, decisions were made in the Washington, D.C., bubble, far removed from the local residents who actually work the land and have to live with the consequences of D.C.’s actions. This monument review is the exact opposite,” Zinke said in a press release
Despite soliciting input from tribes and the public, Zinke has already made up his mind about the Bears
Ears National Monument
. He's already told President Donald Trump
that the boundaries need to be "right-sized" due to opposition from non-Indian politicians in Utah.
"This last round of public comment was a futile attempt by the administration to garner public opposition," Utah Diné Bikéyah
, a grassroots organization on the Navajo Nation
that supports Bears Ears, said in a statement on Tuesday.
"There is only one proper outcome in the face of overwhelming public support for the BENM, as well as a solid public record that reflects the monument’s essential role in protecting the cultural heritage, traditional knowledge, and natural resources of the region: The administration needs to leave Bears Ears National Monument intact and preserved for future generations," the group added.
A broad group of tribes, known as the Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition
, convinced then-president Barack Obama
to protect 1.35 million-acres of sacred sites, ancestral territory and archaeological resources. They were also granted a role in co-managing the new monument with the federal government.
Zinke, however, contends the Bears Ears Commission needs to be authorized by Congress. The recommendations in his interim report
were condemned by the five tribes with representatives on the commission.
"The radical idea of breaking up Bears Ears National Monument is a slap in the face to the members of our tribes and an affront to Indian people all across the country," the coalition said in a June 12 statement
. "Any attempt to eliminate or reduce the boundaries of this monument would be wrong on every count. Such action would be illegal, beyond the reach of presidential authority."
Lawsuits are expected if Trump indeed reduces the size of the monument.
Federal Register Notice:Review
of Certain National Monuments Established Since 1996; Notice of Opportunity for
(May 11, 2017)
Join the Conversation
Romo: We owe it to future generations to keep Bears Ears protected
expected after President Trump changes Bears Ears boundary
Zinke rejects complaints about consultation and Bears Ears
lash out at Trump administration for lapses in consultation
(June 13, 2017)
Benally: Bears Ears was a false promise for Native Americans
show few meetings between Secretary Zinke and tribes
(May 22, 2017)Deadline
looms in Secretary Zinke's review of Bears Ears and other monuments
Tempest Williams: Will Bears Ears be the next Standing Rock?
vow fight in effort to protect Bears Ears National Monument
encounter silence from Secretary Zinke in Bears Ears review
Tribe demands 'voice' as Trump orders review of Bears Ears
singles out Bears Ears as an 'abuse' of government's power
Keeler: New monument marks victory for tribal sites
(January 10, 2017)
celebrate designation of national monument at Bears Ears
(January 9, 2017)