An upcoming U.S. Supreme Court
case affecting online taxation could hinder economic growth in Indian Country, according to the nation's largest inter-tribal organization.
In South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.
, the Supreme Court will decide whether an online retailer must pay sales taxes to the state of South Dakota. The case is being closed watched across the country because the outcome affects a centerpiece of the American economy -- according to the Department of Commerce, consumers spent more than $453 billion on the internet in 2017
, representing nine percent of all retail sales.
Ahead of oral arguments on April 17, the National Congress of American Indians
wants the Supreme Court to know that tribes and their citizens will be impacted too. Although the organization isn't taking sides in the dispute, President Jefferson Keel said the justices must take into account tribal sovereignty before they issue a decision.
“The Commerce Clause recognizes tribes as sovereign governments with the authority to collect taxes and to be immune from certain taxes,” Keel said in a press release
“We are urging the Supreme Court to protect these fundamental principles as it considers whether to expand state authority to collect online sales taxes," Keel continued. "Tribal governments operate and fund courts of law, police, road systems and schools, and have a great need for tax revenue to fund governmental services.”
Under the 1992 decision in Quill v. North Dakota
., the Supreme Court limited the ability of states to collect taxes from online sales.
A retailer must have a physical presence in a state in order to be taxed by the state, according to the ruling.
Decades later, South Dakota is presenting a simple yet stark argument to the nation's highest court. "Times have changed," the state's opening brief reads
"Internet retail now makes it possible to do billions in business in a forum without having a strictly 'physical' presence there, while also interacting far more pervasively— and being much more 'present'—than catalog mailers ever were," the brief states.
If states win the right to tax internet transactions, tribes fear they will be unable to do the same. The concern is grounded in reality -- some states and counties impose taxes on everything from retail sales to energy development in Indian Country but few of the dollars -- if any at all -- make it to reservations, where infrastructure and service needs are great.
"I'm sure there's people on your reservations who buy things online, they buy things in mail order," John Dossett, NCAI's general counsel, told tribal leaders during the organization's winter session in Washington, D.C., last month. "Does the state get to collect those taxes or does the tribe get to say who collects the taxes?"
A slide presented during the annual convention of National Congress of American Indians in October 2017 explains the background of the Indian
Trader Regulations, which govern economic activity on reservations. Photo by Indianz.Com (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
In some places, the dollar figures from the dual system of taxation are staggering. In North Dakota, for example, the state has taken more than $1.2 billion from energy development on the homelands of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara
The tribe, in comparison, has seen less than $1 billion during that same time, according to figures from the state's
"The state of North Dakota is draining our taxes," Randy Phelan, the tribe's vice chairman, said during NCAI's annual convention last October.
Such systems of dual taxation are "unfair" to tribes., NCAI writes in its Wayfair
"This problem of double taxation could be exacerbated if the court issues an opinion in this case that lacks the limiting language [tribes] seek and thus could be misinterpreted as expanding states’ authority to impose sales taxes in Indian Country," the filing reads.
Tribes thought they were going to get a leg up in the dual taxation battle, which has raged in and out of the courts for decades, with an update to the so-called Indian Trader Regulations
But many believe the Trump administration has basically killed the effort -- since Deputy Secretary David
, the second-in-command arrived at the Department of the Interior
last August, there's been no movement to finalize the rule.
Join the Conversation
Country left behind as Republicans push tax cuts through Congress
Trump told tribes to 'just do it' when it comes to energy development
(November 6, 2017)Cronkite
News: Tribes left out of Republican push for tax reform in Washington
(November 2, 2017)Witness
list for Senate Committee on Indian Affairs hearing on tax policy reform
(October 31, 2017)Tribes
don't want to be left behind as Washington turns to tax policy reform
(October 26, 2017)Tribes
press Congress for greater authority -- including taxation -- over their
(October 25, 2017)Top
Trump administration official casts doubt on tribal economic development rule
(October 24, 2017)'Ominous
shadow' of President Trump looms over annual meeting of tribal leaders
(October 20, 2017)Trump
team moves quickly to finalize big tribal economic development proposal
(August 7, 2017)Trump
hire at Bureau of Indian Affairs makes big promise on tribal taxation
Trump promises 'freedom' for tribes seeking to exploit their resources
of Indian Affairs opens consultation on big economic proposal
of Indian Affairs opens door to big shift in tribal economies