Native women carry a banner during the 16th Annual Memorial March to Honor Our Lost Children in Sioux City, Iowa, on November 21, 2018. Photo by Kevin Abourezk

Indian health law killed by same judge behind Indian Child Welfare Act ruling

A federal judge who invalidated the Indian Child Welfare Act has issued another controversial ruling that could devastate tribal nations.

In a 55-page decision issued on Friday, Judge Reed O'Connor declared the entirety of the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare, to be unconstitutional. The historic law, enacted in 2010, includes a permanent reauthorization of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, so now the IHCIA has been thrown into an legal gray area.

And just like the ICWA ruling, O'Connor did not attempt to determine whether he could save the IHCIA, which updates key programs at the Indian Health Service, or other provisions of Obamacare that benefit Indian Country. Except for one sentence about tribal citizens who are exempt from the law's health care insurance mandate, the decision did not address the federal government's trust and treaty responsibilities.

"American Indians and Alaska Natives have specific health coverage benefits and protections in the Health Insurance Marketplace," the IHS noted in a post on Facebook, reminding tribal citizens of the ability to choose to enroll in a health care plan.

"Members of federally recognized tribes and ANCSA shareholders can enroll in a plan year-round, but this is still a good time to think about your health care needs," the post continued, linking to an explanation of Obamacare's Indian Country provisions.

Unlike the ICWA decision, though, O'Connor did not impose an injunction that might otherwise suspend the Affordable Care Act so the law -- including the IHCIA -- remains in force. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra is vowing to ensure it stays that way.

“Today’s ruling is an assault on 133 million Americans with preexisting conditions, on the 20 million Americans who rely on the ACA for healthcare, and on America’s faithful progress toward affordable healthcare for all Americans,” said Becerra, a Democrat who has also taken steps to defend ICWA in California.

“The ACA has already survived more than 70 unsuccessful repeal attempts and withstood scrutiny in the Supreme Court," Becerra said in statement on Friday. "Today’s misguided ruling will not deter us: our coalition will continue to fight in court for the health and wellbeing of all Americans.”

Judge O'Connor was nominated to the bench by Republican president George W. Bush, a former governor of Texas. He serves on the federal court in the Northern District of Texas, where no tribes are based.

According to The New York Times, O'Connor is the only judge on that court who can hear cases in the divisions to which he is assigned. All of the other judges in those divisions are either semi-retired or the seats are vacant.

That could explain why Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, filed both the Indian Child Welfare Act and the Obamacare lawsuits in the Fort Worth Division, where O'Connor is the only active judge.

“Today’s ruling halts an unconstitutional exertion of federal power over the American healthcare system,” Paxton said in a celebratory statement on Friday. “Our lawsuit seeks to effectively repeal Obamacare, which will give President Trump and Congress the opportunity to replace the failed social experiment with a plan that ensures Texans and all Americans will again have greater choice about what health coverage they need and who will be their doctor.”

The next stage in the Obamacare case would be to take it to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, a historically conservative venue. Tribes are already there with the ICWA case.

"As I predicted all along, Obamacare has been struck down as an UNCONSTITUTIONAL disaster! Now Congress must pass a STRONG law that provides GREAT healthcare and protects pre-existing conditions," President Donald Turmp wrote in a post on Twitter on Friday evening.

The Trump administration is also taking part in the appeal of the ICWA decision. In addition to striking down the law as one based on "race," Judge O'Connor invalidated Bureau of Indian Affairs regulations that were written to strengthen compliance with the law.

"We reiterate our support for ICWA’s goals of ensuring the safety of Indian children, maintaining Indian families, and promoting tribal sovereignty," Tara Sweeney, the Trump administration's new Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, said in response to the October 4 ruling.

The 5th Circuit has put a stay on O'Connor's decision while the appeal proceeds. The case is being expedited, with oral arguments tentatively scheduled for early March.

But before the court intervened, Attorney General Paxton instructed the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services to stop following ICWA and to stop adhering to the BIA regulations. The department has since pulled back on that directive.

"As long as the 5th Circuit. stay remains in effect, the provisions of Section 4, The Indian Child Welfare Act, will apply to pending DFPS litigation," the department's website reads.

Read More on the Story
In Weaponized Courts, Judge Who Halted Affordable Care Act Is a Conservative Favorite (The New York Times December 15, 2018)
Ruling Striking Down Obamacare Moves Health Debate to Center Stage (The New York Times December 15, 2018)
Health Law Could Be Hard to Knock Down Despite Judge’s Ruling (The New York Times December 15, 2018)
Texas Judge Strikes Down Obama’s Affordable Care Act as Unconstitutional (The New York Times December 14, 2018)
Federal judge in Texas rules entire Obama health-care law is unconstitutional (The Washington Post December 14, 2018)

An Opinion
Jonathan H. Adler and Abbe R. Gluck: What the Lawless Obamacare Ruling Means (The New York Times December 15, 2018)

ICWA and the Media

The Native American Journalists Association recently updated its guide to ethical reporting on the Indian Child Welfare Act.

"It’s not a journalist’s duty to determine if a child is Native 'enough,' but whether or not they are citizens under Tribal law," the guide states. "Reporting phenotypes and blood percentages is culturally offensive, and disregards and diminishes the political rights of Indigenous people."

The document can be found on naja.com.

Join the Conversation

Related Stories
Cronkite News: Tribes on 'pins and needles' in Indian Child Welfare Act case (November 13, 2018)
Court puts hold on controversial Indian Child Welfare Act ruling (December 4, 2018)
March held in honor of Native children lost in foster care (November 22, 2018)
Sherry Treppa: Court decision threatens the Indian Child Welfare Act (October 29, 2018)
'Intentional and direct attack': Tribes vow fight for Indian Child Welfare Act (October 25, 2018)
More tribal leaders criticize ruling in Indian Child Welfare Act case (October 10, 2018)
Indian Country outraged by decision in Indian Child Welfare Act case (October 8, 2018)
Judge strikes down Indian Child Welfare Act in contested ruling (October 5, 2018)
Tribes help bring down barriers to Indian Child Welfare Act (October 3, 2018)
Advocates weigh next move in Indian Child Welfare Act case (September 26, 2018)
Court strikes down landmark Indian Child Welfare Act ruling (September 18, 2018)
Appeals court won't rule on challenge to Indian Child Welfare Act (August 7, 2018)
Conservative group claims victory in Indian Child Welfare Act case (March 15, 2018)
Graham Lee Brewer: Attacks on Indian Child Welfare Act are real (March 13, 2018)
High Country News: Indian Child Welfare Act under conservative fire (March 6, 2018)
Supreme Court turns away another conservative attack on Indian Child Welfare Act (February 21, 2018)
Tribes battle state of South Dakota over removal of Indian children (February 19, 2018)
Indian Child Welfare Act under attack again as conservative group submits appeal to Supreme Court (December 12, 2017)
'Stand up, fight back!' -- Annual march to honor lost Native children continues (November 23, 2017)
Cronkite News: Tribal advocates welcome action on Indian Child Welfare Act case (November 1, 2017)
Supreme Court won't take up race-based challenge to Indian Child Welfare Act (October 30, 2017)
Non-Indian parents file lawsuit to halt transfer of child custody cases to tribes (October 11, 2017)
Conservative group launches another attack on Indian Child Welfare Act (July 24, 2017)