Cronkite NewsAugust 25, 2020, Orders | Statement by Justice Sonia Sotomayor] WASHINGTON – With his execution scheduled for Wednesday, attorneys for Lezmond Mitchell, a Navajo on federal death row, are making what one expert conceded were longshot last-minute attempts to stop it. Mitchell, 38, last week asked the Supreme Court to delay his execution, and Navajo Nation leaders and Native American advocacy groups have asked President Donald Trump to commute Mitchell’s sentence to life in prison. But there had not been action on either request by Tuesday, as federal officials “barrel towards the August 26 execution date,” as Mitchell’s attorneys wrote in their appeal to the Supreme Court. “It’s a Hail Mary, there’s almost no chance,” said Matthew Fletcher, law professor at Michigan State University and director of the Indigenous Law & Policy Center who has followed Mitchell’s case closely. On Tuesday, Mitchell’s attorneys filed a separate petition with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, urging it to delay his execution to give the clemency office time to review his claim. If the execution goes forward in the U.S. Penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana, it would be the first time in modern history that the federal government carried out the death penalty for a crime between Native Americans on tribal land over the objections of the tribal government, his attorneys said. “There’s a feeling that, you know, the matter is something that should be in the hands of the Navajo leaders …. That we should have the power to make decisions,” said Robert Yazzie, who was the Navajo Nation chief justice during the time of Mitchell’s crime. But Mitchell’s arguments on tribal authority have been struck down in courts and his latest appeal – his last – rides on a claim of racial bias by the jury that sentenced him to death, which was made up of 11 whites and one Native American.
While tribes have jurisdiction over most crimes committed by Native Americans against other Natives on reservation land, the federal government takes over for crimes – including murder – listed in the Major Crimes Act of 1885. Tribes gained back some control with the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994, which said federal prosecutors needed tribal approval to seek the death penalty for crimes listed in the Major Crimes Act. But the 1994 law also expanded the list of capital crimes to include some not listed in the Major Crimes Act – including carjacking resulting in death. If Mitchell had been charged only with murder, the Major Crimes Act would have required Navajo Nation consent to pursue the death penalty, Fletcher said. But then-U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft also pushed for a charge of carjacking resulting in death, which would let the government seek the death penalty without tribal approval. Federal prosecutors had originally recommended against the death penalty, based on opposition not only of the Navajo Nation but also on the opposition of the victims’ family at the time. Typically in such cases, Fletcher said, a U.S. attorney requests the death penalty and the federal death penalty committee has to approve it. But at the time of Mitchell’s crime, soon after the 911 attacks, Ashcroft was “going for the death penalty in every conceivable possible case,” Fletcher said. The Navajo Nation has denounced the death penalty many times as being against its spiritual beliefs and sovereign laws. Yazzie said that, while there is diversity of opinion on the death penalty among the Navajo people, the tribe looks to its traditions to make its laws. But Troy Eid, president of the Navajo Nation Bar Association and former chair of the Indian Law and Order Commission, said the question of whether tribes have a say in capital cases like Mitchell’s has been answered by courts. While Eid supports tribal input, he said, the courts have ruled that it is not needed for federal capital crimes not included in the Major Crimes Act – like carjacking resulting in death. Mitchell’s latest appeals have turned on his claim of jury bias, but courts have repeatedly rejected his request to interview jurors in his case. The most recent ruling, by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, said the law is on the government’s side but that proceeding with Mitchell’s execution “demonstrates a deep disrespect for tribal sovereignty.” Mitchell lost his last appeal in the 9th Circuit on June 15 and was preparing an appeal to the Supreme Court when the Justice Department in late July set the August 26 execution date. His appeal was filed August 13, and a request for an emergency stay was filed August 19. Mitchell would be the fourth man executed on federal death row in the last five weeks. The last federal execution before then was in 2003, but Attorney General William Barr last year ordered that executions resume. In a letter to Trump last week, Navajo Nation President Jonathan Nez and Vice President Myron Lizer urged a commutation, calling the government’s pursuit of a death sentence for Mitchell “in complete disregard to the Navajo Nation’s deliberate decision not to opt-in to the death penalty under the Federal Death Penalty Act.” Commuting his sentence, they wrote, would be “appropriate to begin to restore harmony and balance to the affected families and to the inherent sovereignty of the Navajo Nation.” Fletcher doubts Trump will commute the sentence, and is skeptical that the Supreme Court will take up the case “unless something really strange happens.” “You need five justices to stop the execution, and they didn’t … stop any of the federal executions last month,” he said. “I don’t see this is any different.” For Yazzie, the execution of Mitchell would go against not just Navajo sovereignty, but Navajo tradition. “A matter of giving life and taking life away, I think it’s just, it’s a function of something beyond us as a human being,” Yazzie said. “We weren’t placed on Earth to have that kind of power.” For more stories from Cronkite News, visit cronkitenews.azpbs.org.
PRESS RELEASE: Navajo Nation calls for end to Federal execution of tribal member, Lezmond Mitchell - https://t.co/Xw4XYhCbVb pic.twitter.com/uW3HER9eFr— 24th Navajo Nation Council (@NavajoCouncil) August 13, 2020
Department of Justice: Lezmond Mitchell"Lezmond Mitchell stabbed to death a 63-year-old grandmother and forced her nine-year-old granddaughter to sit beside her lifeless body for a 30 to 40-mile drive. Mitchell then slit the girl’s throat twice, crushed her head with 20-pound rocks, and severed and buried both victims’ heads and hands. On May 8, 2003, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona found Mitchell guilty of numerous offenses, including first degree murder, felony murder, and carjacking resulting in murder, and he was sentenced to death. Mitchell’s execution is scheduled to occur on Dec. 11, 2019."
-- Federal Government to Resume Capital Punishment After Nearly Two Decade Lapse (July 25, 2019)
9th Circuit Court of Appeals DecisionsMitchell v. USA (April 30, 2020)
United States v. Mitchell (June 19, 2015)
United States v. Mitchell (September 5, 2007)
Note: This story originally appeared on Cronkite News. It is published via a Creative Commons license. Cronkite News is produced by the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University.
Join the Conversation