As I get old, I am learning that age doesn’t give people wisdom as much as it gives them courage to say things that need to be said, no matter if those things might be unpopular. And much of that courage comes from not having all that much to lose any more. I’m learning that few things really hurt me any more, and those things that hurt can come only from people I love. Finally, I realize that fear has little purpose when you can’t be hurt. Ultimately someone can kill you, but that someone cannot take away what you have already lived. I don’t have a whole bunch more to live in terms of years or even months, perhaps. But I have nearly 75 years behind me, which have been good years for the most part.
So, starting now, I am going to say what I want to say. I will try not to hurt anyone personally. On the other hand, I hope that what I have to say will help dispose of things that stand in the way of our people’s rights, culture, and possibilities for the future – especially the young people.
So here goes:
First of all, I’m an in-your-face Lakota and proud of it; and I resent people being told that they can’t use my tribal name in carrying out a worthy mission, especially if it is toward higher educational pursuit, no matter how thinly associated.
I don’t object to the word Sioux as a team name for any college. We know why a school would choose it, because it honors and flatters their image, and it inspires their performance. The symbol is a metaphor for courage in warfare, pride and nobility, which is what I feel in the pride I take in being Sioux. If the school that adopts the name allows any display that belittles and offends the culture of tribal people whose name they have appropriated, then they should be called upon to correct the situation. If they allow it to go on, or encourage such behavior, then they should be pressured or otherwise forced to discontinue its use. It is a privilege, and should be deserved.
On the other hand, the institution should agree to dedicate resources to promote the history, culture, and image of the people their team name represents. And they should work to provide opportunities to the children whose veins carry the blood of those tribes, and help them to advance both in their own world and in the larger world outside their homelands.
And those legions of perpetually-offended purveyors of over-sensitivity and grumpy victimhood should just let it go. Go home and allow the students to get back to doing the work for which they and their families have chosen the institution, even despite its nickname (if that had even entered their minds).
And I don’t object to the adjective “Fighting” as part of the name. A descriptive that would mightily offend me would be, let’s say, “Whining Sioux,” as the actions of some of our super-sensitive relatives might suggest. But Fighting Sioux is apropos and quite noble.
This sulking, sour minority is being allowed to stop a nation – the Standing Rock, from exercising its sovereignty by conducting a referendum on the subject and allowing their people to decide on the appropriateness of using the name. And they are being allowed to demean the results of the referendum conducted by the people at Spirit Lake. All because it embarrasses them if the people, the oyate, don’t agree with them. Expressed or not, you get what their answer is: “Who do the people think they are, and what do they know?”
If they get their way and the name is jettisoned, it will not be the end of anybody’s world. However, neither will it make a whit of difference in the physical, mental or emotional welfare of our people. Those children of our tribesmen who walk the UND campus will not breathe any freer than before; they will not have been emancipated.
Instead, they will have hammered into place the first shackle to chains that can hold them back, the chains of victimhood. And victimhood is what this is all about – It is not pride, and it is certainly not a show of confidence in the strength of our cultures.
I feel that the tribes – not just the Sioux, but the Mandan, Hidatsa, Arikara, and Turtle Mountain people as well – should instead hammer out an agreement with the college for programs that would advance knowledge and understanding of the histories and cultures of the tribes in North Dakota. They should hammer out an agreement as to what constitutes disrespect for those cultures and their symbols, with actions to discourage and prevent disrespectful displays.
They should work with the school to put into place programs that would help Native American youth adapt and adjust to college life, and to help boost retention. There are many things that could be worked out in exchange for the privilege of using the Sioux name and the metaphor that it represents to the college and its students and athletes.
If this could be done, it would shed positive light on students and advocates who, in all seriousness and in the best of spirits, had worked for change. It need not be seen as a “defeat” for them.
First of all, I think the tribal people of Standing Rock, the oyate, should be given a chance to express their views via referendum, and they should be heard and taken seriously.
Charles Trimble, Oglala Lakota from the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation was a principal founder of the American Indian Press Association in 1970 and served as Executive Director of the National Congress of American Indians from 1972-1978. He is retired and lives in Omaha, Nebraska. He can be reached at email@example.com. His website is iktomisweb.com.
Related Stories:Charles Trimble: Sioux Nation can truly unite
(9/25) Charles Trimble: Human blood
in Lakota blood
(9/15) Charles Trimble:
Take action to address despair
(9/8) Charles Trimble: Confronting racism can work
(8/20)Charles Trimble: Lessons from Indian
(8/7) Charles Trimble:
McDonald's not a bastion of racism
(7/2)Charles Trimble: Indian affairs rife for comedy
(6/25) Charles Trimble: No more
Trimble: The demise of the 'Fighting Sioux'
(6/9) Charles Trimble: Black Hills return just a dream
(6/8) Charles Trimble: After Custer,
still fighting battles
Trimble: More on traditional names
(5/18) Charles Trimble: Taking pride in traditional names
(4/24) Charles Trimble: Recalling the
Burro of Indian Affairs
Trimble: Reconciliation and Wounded Knee
(4/13) Charles Trimble: Support Lumbee recognition
(3/27) Charles Trimble: From the voices
(3/23) Charles Trimble:
Rebirth of 'Luke Warm Water'
(3/20) Charles Trimble: Never ending Wounded Knee story
(3/16) Charles Trimble: Facts and truth
of Wounded Knee
(3/9) Charles Trimble:
Answering Obama's call to hope
(3/6) Charles Trimble: Discussing the fate of the Indian
(2/13) Charles Trimble: The 51st
state for Indian Country
Trimble: A challenge for the next generation
(1/6) Charles Trimble: Thanksgiving and colonization
(11/21)Charles Trimble: NCAI service the
highpoint in life
Trimble: Indian warriors serve nations
(11/12) Charles Trimble: Pawnee Nation reburies ancestors
(10/31)Charles Trimble: Twisting history
(10/20) Charles Trimble:
Sen. Obama a man for our time
(10/13) Charles Trimble: Tribes are players in
Overdue obituary of Shirley Plume
(09/08)Charles Trimble: Indian Country must take control
(9/5) Charles Trimble: On the last
Indian war with Giago
(9/1) Tim Giago:
Moving from victimhood to victors
(9/1) Q&A with Charles Trimble: On Indian victimhood
(8/25) Charles Trimble: Shed the chains