"Most recently, the Carcieri v. Salazar decision of Feb. 24 has been a recurrent topic of discussion within the Indian communities in D.C. I’ve heard it discussed amongst Indian lawyers in offices at the National Congress of American Indians Executive Summit and in passing at the National Indian Gaming Commissions meeting in D.C.

I know the implications could be huge for those tribes not federally recognized in 1934 and that the opinions of the Supreme Court justices on the use of the word “now” are the reason. So, when I went to visit with Justice Scalia I thought perhaps I would use the opportunity to ask about the case and see what he said.

I began by mentioning the Supreme Court ruling on a case involving a Rhode Island tribe and the issue of having to be federally recognized in 1934, I was fairly short in my address and didn’t get a chance to finish my question, which was going to be, “what do you think of all the attention to the case?” The justice promptly cut me off in mid-sentence and asked if I’d read the statute. I had only read about 20 articles talking about the statute so technically, I suppose, I hadn’t read it, so I said I’d read some of the statute. That was all he needed to begin a rather defensive rant embarrassing me in front of a room of 30 or more people. He said that if I’d read the statute then I would know what the word “now” meant and that to him; “The case is a laugher.” That’s his response to a young Indian woman brave enough to face him.

My shock made me sit down and wonder what exactly I’d said that prompted the chastising. I felt disrespected, but worse was that I felt sadness. For all of us, Indian and non-Indian, working and fighting to keep what is rightfully ours and to have this so called “justice” slamming down his rhetorical hammer defending an unjust nation’s legislation was a slap in the face. He had earlier stated to another Indian student brave enough to stand and ask a question that the U.S. right to rule was by conquest and all Indian law was based off that."

Get the Story:
Nazune Menka: ‘The case is a laugher’ (Indian Country Today 5/29)

Supreme Court Decision:
Syllabus | Opinion [Thomas] | Concurrence [Breyer] | Dissent [Stevens] | Concurrence/Dissent [Souter]

Supreme Court Documents:
Oral Argument Transcript | Briefs

Related Stories:
NCAI leader blasts resurgence of 'Indian fighters' (5/29)
Dorgan promises action on land-into-trust ruling (5/22)
Senate Indian Affairs hearing on land-into-trust (5/21)
Tribal critic to testify at land-into-trust hearing (5/19)
Senate Indian Affairs hearing on land-into-trust (5/18)
Failed Alaska nominee signed land-into-trust letter (05/11)
USET to broadcast land-into-trust session on web (5/11)
Turtle Talk: State AGs oppose land-into-trust fix (4/30)
NIGC's Hogen not drawing up post-1934 tribes list (4/29)
In The Hoop: Making a list, checking it ... (4/29)
Turtle Talk: Lists of post-1934 tribes a bad idea (4/29)
NIGC compiling list of post-1934 recognized tribes (4/28)
USET to host forum on land-into-trust decision (4/23)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe confident of Carcieri fix (4/16)
Prior land-into-trust acquisitions appear safe (4/6)
Land-into-trust worries aired at House hearing (4/2)
Dorgan promises hearing on land-into-trust decision (4/2)
Narragansett Tribe hopeful for land-into-trust fix (4/2)
Audio: House Resources hearing on Carcieri (4/1)
Witness list for House hearing on land-into-trust (3/31)
Land-into-trust options weighed after Carcieri (3/26)
House Resources hearing on land-into-trust ruling (3/26)
Turtle Talk: Money damages and land-into-trust (03/26)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe seeks land-into-trust fix (3/25)
Letter: Overturn Supreme Court on land-into-trust (3/24)
Tribes protest against land-into-trust decision (3/23)
Ione Band worried about casino after high court ruling (3/23)
Tribes to protest against land-into-trust decision (3/20)
Shakopee Tribe not worried about land-into-trust (3/19)
Poarch Band not worried about land-into-trust ruling (3/17)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe sticks with casino (3/17)
Narragansett Tribe plans land-into-trust protest (3/16)
Senate hearing on land-into-trust set for April 2 (3/13)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe asks Congress for fix (3/12)
Dorgan says no quick fix to land-into-trust ruling (3/9)
California a battleground after land-into-trust ruling (3/6)
Chemehuevi Tribe waits on off-reservation casino (3/6)
NCAI opens winter session in Washington DC (3/4)
Turtle Talk: No easy fix for land-into-trust ruling (3/2)
Rhode Island delegation cool to land-into-trust ruling (3/2)
Fletcher: Now's the time to fix land-into-trust ruling (2/26)
Rep. Rahall to call hearing on land-into-trust ruling (2/26)
Narragansett Tribe to fight land-into-trust ruling (2/26)
Cowlitz Tribe weighs impact of land-into-trust decision (2/26)
Menominee Nation hopes for shift on land-into-trust (2/26)
Gun Lake casino foes review land-into-trust options (2/26)
Supreme Court rules in big land-into-trust case (2/25)
Tribes will ask Congress to 'fix' land-into-trust decision (2/25)
Massachusetts tribe blasts land-into-trust ruling (2/25)
Oneida Nation not worried about land-into-trust (2/25)
Turtle Talk: Implications of land-into-trust ruling (2/25)
Turtle Talk: Thoughts on land-into-trust decision (2/25)