Charles Trimble: Injustice in removal of Cherokee Freedmen

We read and absorb as truth the accounts of historical observers like Thomas More, Amerigo Vespucci, Las Casas, Rousseau to bolster our view of our ancestral people as pristine in relationship with all of nature, and pure in social structures and systems.

In our struggle for the rights of our Native people and our tribal governments, we point out the terrible things that we have suffered over history. Those accounts are manifold in history books – the taking of our lands and our forced removal from primeval homelands, and the slaughter of our people from the earliest days of contact with the European invaders.

We have adopted the terms genocide and holocaust to describe the killing of our tribes through pestilence, removal, and unprovoked warfare. And we grieve the memory of the massacre of Cheyenne and Arapaho families at Sand Creek in Colorado, the slaughter of Cheyenne men, women and children at Washita, rampant slaughter of the inhabitants of Indian Island in California, and the infamous massacre at Wounded Knee Creek.

Often we recall these things to put our conquerors and colonizers on a guilt trip to loosen up federal purse strings to meet the needs of our people who have been reduced to dependency on our colonizers. And we recall these horrors to stir our political adrenaline in the ongoing fight for our rights as citizens of the first nations on this continent.

So it is painful in reading history to learn truths that disappoint our preconceptions of our nobler selves – to learn that we are just humans after all. Increasingly we are shaken to consciousness to this fact by actions in our tribal nations today.

Such is the case with me in the disenfranchisement of the black “Freedmen” of the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma. I have read from books on the Trail of Tears and on the American Civil War in Indian Territory, and the often-omitted information of the tribes’ black slaves in those historical migrations adds even more to their tragic history.

It is true that the newly emancipated slaves of Cherokee-owned plantations were forced onto the tribe by the victorious Union as punishment for Cherokee militia having fought against the North in the Civil War, and the tribe was forced to incorporate the slaves into its citizenry.

It is true that early on Cherokee entrepreneurs, to meet expectations of the conquerors and colonizers to assimilate, had become slave owners because it enabled them to compete economically in agriculture, especially in growing cotton. So, it can be said – albeit in gross irony – that as part of their efforts to become “civilized” Native farmers adopted slavery.

These Cherokee farmers and entrepreneurs were among the core group that negotiated and signed the 1835 Treaty of New Echota which accepted removal west to Indian Territory. And it was the slave owners largely that formed the first wave to emigrate west on the Trail of Tears. But for these Cherokee elite the Trail of Tears was facilitated by the slaves they took with them, and the hundreds more that they purchased along the way, most of them to be sold to meet demand for agriculture in the new territory.

And in the new territory, during the Civil War, the issue of slavery split each of the relocated Five Civilized Tribes, and dragged them into the cruelest internecine warfare imaginable in the American Civil War. Cherokee general Stand Watie, in command of the combined tribal troops fighting for the South and the last confederate general to surrender his forces at the end of the War, waged a merciless campaign against the anti-slavery forces of Apothle Yoholo, Creek leader of the ragtag intertribal anti-slavery group loyal to the Union. General Watie’s orders to his troops forbade them to take any Black prisoners. They were to be killed upon capture.

In the end, the surviving slaves were those that, out of loyalty and fear, wouldn’t leave their Native plantations, and others that were afraid to leave knowing they would be killed as runaways. Some of the remaining slaves even fought beside their Cherokee masters for the South. These were the black people that were forced upon the Cherokee by treaty to take into its tribal membership rolls at the end of the Civil War.

This is my reading of that tragic era in Civil War history. Thus, to me, the actions taken by the Cherokee Tribe and its Supreme Court to disenfranchise those Freedmen, and the way it was done with apparent political motives, reek of injustice, if not racism. And using tribal sovereignty as the reason cheapens sovereignty. There is no question in my mind that Cherokee sovereignty gives them power to take the action that was taken. But the exercise of its sovereignty also means that the Cherokee Nation could tell those Black citizens that they are welcome to stay and enjoy their tribal heritage and homelands that were forced onto them.

There is light, however, in this messy swamp that taints Indian America. Cherokee attorney Ralph Keen, Jr., who courageously represents the Freedmen in their cause, is to be commended for his defense of this embattled minority among minorities. He sets a standard for which the entire Cherokee Nation, and all Indian Country and beyond, must admire and celebrate. I knew his father, the late Ralph Keen Sr., an honorable Cherokee who must from beyond be proud of his son.

Mr Keen understands and appreciates tribal Sovereignty; it is powerful stuff, but it must have humanity, it must have justice, it must have soul.

Charles "Chuck" Trimble, was born and raised on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation, and is a member of the Oglala Lakota Nation. He was principal founder of the American Indian Press Association in 1970, and served as Executive Director of the National Congress of American Indians from 1972-1978. He is retired and lives in Omaha, NE. He can be contacted at cchuktrim@aol.com and his website is www.iktomisweb.com.

Join the Conversation

More from Charles Trimble:
Charles Trimble: Don't mess with this 84-year-old Dakota lady (9/6)
Charles Trimble: US manipulation of tribes goes back centuries (9/2)
Charles Trimble: Relative misery - I cried because I had no shoes (8/15)
Charles Trimble: I survived a boarding school, unfortunately... (8/3)
Charles Trimble: Hitman takes aim at Oglala Sioux Tribe leaders (7/25)
Charles Trimble: A crisis of faith amid abuses in Catholic Church (7/22)
Charles Trimble: A Lakota's faith and betrayal (first of series) (6/13)
Charles Trimble: Young Indian man chained by victimhood (5/23)
Charles Trimble: Snagriculture, skinship and other new words (5/9)
Charles Trimble: Making friends with a former BIA 'enemy' (5/2)
Charles Trimble: Lakota popcorn and other Sioux subjects (4/18)
Charles Trimble: Journalist Richard LaCourse is an unsung hero (4/4)
Charles Trimble: St. Patrick's Day at an Indian boarding school (3/21)
Charles Trimble: Sovereignty for rent with payday loan business (3/14)
Charles Trimble: Taking a lesson from reader Rodney Little Bird (2/28)
Charles Trimble: Wounded Knee occupation had positive effects (2/21)
Charles Trimble: Tribal advocacy in the history of the United States (2/7)
Charles Trimble: Technology can play a role in preserving culture (1/31)
Charles Trimble: What Native journalism means in Indian Country (1/24)
Charles Trimble: What does the new year hold for Indian Country? (1/12)
Charles Trimble: Assassination attempt highlights gun mentality (1/10)
Charles Trimble: Urban Indians put on Christmas pageant in Denver (1/3)