Environment | Law | National | Politics

Dakota Access defends effort to keep oil spill documents secret






Indigenous women participate in a panel discussion as part of Native Nations Rise in Washington, D.C, on March 8, 2017. Photo: Ayse Gorsuz / Indigenous Rising Media

The wealthy backers of the Dakota Access Pipeline are offering more details about oil spill documents they want to keep from tribes and the public.

With oil set to flow through the pipeline in a matter of days, Dakota Access keeps bringing up the possibility for "wrongdoers" to damage the controversial project. That concern is driving the firm's request to keep 11 documents under wraps.

"The intense public attention this case has received, along with criminal actions already taken by those opposed to the pipeline, counsel in favor of extending confidentiality to portions of a small number of documents," the firm's attorneys wrote on Wednesday.

More than 800 people indeed have been arrested in connection with opposition to the pipeline. But none are accused of trying to damage the infrastructure itself, although some were charged after chaining themselves to construction equipment in North Dakota.

Still, Dakota Access contends the public shouldn't be able to see portions of five particular documents regarding oil spill plans at two locations in North Dakota and three in Illinois. The firm says none of the information was used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers when it reviewed and approved the pipeline.

"Dakota Access, the party seeking protection, is the entity responsible for operating the pipeline. The public interest favors protecting the information to ensure the safety of vital infrastructure and to avoid reckless damage to the environment," the attorneys wrote.

Further, the firm argues that the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, as plaintiffs in the case, have access to the full contents of all 11 of the documents. But they just can't disseminate the so-called "security sensitive" portions, the filing reads.

According to the firm, "while the route of the pipeline may be well known, this motion is about protecting information that would help wrongdoers target a particular spot on a route that exceeds 1,100 miles."

The 1,172-mile pipeline is all but finished except for a small portion on Army Corps-managed land in North Dakota. That portion, which is less than a half-mile from the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, had been put on hold by the Obama administration in order to address concerns about treaties, water and other issues.

But after President Donald Trump took office on January 20, he ordered his administration to consider the pipeline in an "expedited" manner. Barely two weeks later, the Army Corps approved the final portion without consulting Standing Rock or Cheyenne River.

Tomorrow, we are marching because we want the new President and our new Administration to #TakeTheMeeting; meet with...

Posted by Standing Rock Sioux Tribe on Thursday, March 9, 2017

Standing Rock Sioux Tribe on Facebook: Native Nations Rise

The tribes are still hoping they can stop oil from flowing through the pipeline. They have asked a federal judge to set aside the easement that was granted by the Army Corps to Dakota Access, arguing that the decision was arbitrary and without a solid basis in law.

Briefing continues on their requests as construction crews complete their work in North Dakota. Pipe is being laid under the Missouri River and crude oil could be flowing as soon as next week, the firm said in a status update on Monday.

Meanwhile, Standing Rock leaders and their allies are in Washington, D.C., for Native Nations Rise. The event began on Tuesday with a symbolic teepee camp near the Washington Monument.

On Wednesday, organizers highlighted International Women’s Day with a panel of indigenous women leaders. They discussed efforts to protect their communities from infrastructure projects like Dakota Access.

"I never get tired of doing what I feel is right as a woman, as a native woman, as a person on this planet," said Kandi Mossett, a citizen of the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation, according to Indigenous Rising Media. "We say Mni Wiconi, water of life, water is life."

Activities at the event site on the National Mall continue on Thursday. The week culminates on Friday with a march from the headquarters of the Army Corps to the White House.

"Tomorrow, we are marching because we want the new President and our new Administration to #TakeTheMeeting; meet with Tribal Leaders, and hear our stories," the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe said on Facebook. "Understand our claim to our lands."

Related Stories:
Native Sun News Today: Water protectors take DAPL fight to DC (3/9)
Ivan Star Comes Out: Water protectors experienced raw trauma (3/9)
Judge refuses to halt Dakota Access as pipeline nears completion (3/7)
Dakota Access revises timeline after making 'very good progress' (3/6)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe leads Native Nations Rise march in DC (3/6)
Award-winning group raises funds for Water Protector legal fund (3/6)
Ruling expected this week on injunction against Dakota Access (3/6)
Dakota Access trying to keep documents from tribes and public (3/2)
Senate confirms Dakota Access ally to lead Energy Department (3/2)
Bill to approve non-Indian casinos in North Dakota called 'racist' (3/2)
North Dakota gains financially with completion of Dakota Access (3/2)
Native Sun News Today: Evictions end historic #NoDAPL campsite (3/1)
Winona LaDuke: Water protectors are still standing strong all over (3/1)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe waiting on Dakota Access injunction (2/28)
Peter d'Errico: Yankton Sioux Tribe battles Dakota Access in court (2/28)
Sioux Nation citizens seek to join Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit (2/27)
Dakota Access files another status update on construction work (2/27)
Mark Trahant: The story of Standing Rock won't be going away (2/27)
Jenni Monet: Tribes continue fight as #NoDAPL camps evicted (2/27)
Albert Bender: The war against Dakota Access can still be won (2/27)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe blasts Trump claim of 'constant contact' (2/24)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe calls out Trump 'lies' on Dakota Access (2/24)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe slams Trump for lack of consultation (2/23)
Indian Country joins legal push to block Dakota Access Pipeline (2/22)
Dakota Access offers up March 6 as earliest date for completion (2/22)
Trump administration opposes injunction against Dakota Access (2/22)
Trump team puts hold on pro-tribal Dakota Access legal opinion (2/22)
Native Sun News Today: #NoDAPL campsites see their final days (2/22)
Elizabeth Cook-Lynn: Dakota Access is everything wrong with US (2/22)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe hopes to see return of casino business (2/21)
Dina Gilio-Whitaker: Sen. Hoeven raises red flags in Indian Country (2/20)
Bureau of Indian Affairs issues 'trespass' notice to #NoDAPL camp (2/17)
Hearing on injunction against Dakota Access moved to February 28 (2/17)
Army Department formally cancels Dakota Access Pipeline review (2/16)
Native Sun News Today: Dakota Access firms see spills, explosions (2/16)
James Giago Davies: Tribes face bigger threat than Dakota Access (2/16)
Monte Mills: Tribes turn to courts to battle Dakota Access Pipeline (2/16)
Standing Rock leader vows to 'forgive' despite White House slight (2/15)
Freedom Socialist: Voices from water protectors at Standing Rock (2/15)
New leader of key House panel defends handling of Dakota Access (2/14)
Dakota Access ready to start transporting oil sooner than expected (2/13)
More tribes join effort to halt completion of Dakota Access Pipeline (2/13)
Army Corps gave go ahead to Dakota Access Pipeline in key memo (2/13)
Mark Trahant: Battle over Dakota Access Pipeline is far from over (2/13)
Tribes head back to court in hopes of halting Dakota Access Pipeline (2/10)
Dakota Access pushes to finish pipeline with Army Corps easement (2/9)
Mark Charles: The real reason Trump hasn't heard about #NoDAPL (2/9)
James Giago Davies: Dakota Access battle has got us divided again (2/9)
Tribes promise fight to keep Dakota Access Pipeline out of homeland (2/8)
Key Dakota Access document from Army Corps wasn't filed in court (2/8)
J. Gabriel Ware & James Trimarco: City breaks with bank over DAPL (2/8)
Tracy Loeffelholz Dunn: In defense of Native journalist Jenni Monet (2/8)
Chelsey Luger: Media is still trying to divide and conquer our people (2/8)
Peter d'Errico: Even Donald Trump can't trample over tribal treaties (2/8)
Andrea Carmen/Roberto Borrero: Trump's slash and burn on treaties (2/8)
Trump administration formally approves easement for Dakota Access (2/7)
Mark Trahant: Native journalist charged by North Dakota authorities (2/7)
Albert Bender: Donald Trump goes blitzkrieg on #NoDAPL movement (2/7)
Dakota Access offers timeline as Trump finalizes decision on pipeline (2/6)
Ladonna Bravebull Allard: Indigenous nations must stand our ground (2/6)
Jenni Monet: I got arrested for reporting on the #NoDAPL movement (2/6)
Ray Cook: Now it is time for all of us to stand down at Standing Rock (2/6)
Frances Madeson: More tribes joining with #DefundDAPL movement (2/3)
Mark Trahant: Donald Trump's 'logic' on the Dakota Access Pipeline (2/1)
Winona LaDuke: Tribes emboldened by resistance at Standing Rock (2/1)
Native Sun News Today: Tribes push back on Trump's pipeline orders (2/1)