is set for a final vote today or tomorrow on S.47
, a bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act.
The bill recognizes tribal jurisdiction over non-Indians who commit domestic violence offenses on reservations. Studies show that the majority of perpetrators are non-Indians.
Republicans have raised constitutional concerns about the provision. An alternative that would have tribes to go to federal court to enforce protection orders for American Indian and Alaska Native women was rejected last Thursday.
Sen. Tom Coburn
(R-Oklahoma) is proposing an amendment to strip out the tribal provisions entirely
. He doesn't think the bill will protect the rights of non-Indians and he believes it could lead to an expansion of tribal courts into other areas.
"I think we must also ask an important question: if we are to give tribes special jurisdiction over these types of crimes, why not other crimes? One grant of tribal jurisdiction over criminal law begets another, and soon we may find two separate criminal codes: one for tribal lands and victims, and one for all other crimes. This bill sets dangerous precedent, and we must recognize the problems that will ensue," Coburn said in a statement
Republicans in the House
also have raised concerns. Tribes have been attempting to work with lawmakers to resolve the issue but
Jacqueline Pata, the executive director of the National Congress of American Indians
, expressed frustration.
“When you see these amendments that give more rights to perpetrators than Native women, you start to wonder where the balance is,” Pata told The New York Times. “We would give any other community in this country the resources and tools they need for justice, but we won’t give them to the Indians.”
Get the Story:
Measure to Protect Women Stuck on Tribal Land Issue
(The New York Times 2/11)
Authority of Tribal Courts Key Issue with Violence Against Women Act
Related Stories:Editorial: Reauthorize VAWA with tribal
(2/11) Column: Failing to respond to violence against
(2/11) Senate rejects alternative
to VAWA without tribal jurisdiction
(2/8) Senate set to vote on VAWA with tribal jurisdiction
(2/7) White House backs tribal
jurisdiction provisions in VAWA bill
(2/5) Frontline: Closing a loophole in VAWA to help
(2/5) Ryan Dreveskracht:
Tribal provisions of VAWA up for debate
(2/5)Opinion: The Violence Against Women Act is on life
(01/28) Matt Remle: Violence
against women, violence against earth
(1/25) Haley Elkins: Media goes silent on the failure to
(1/24) NCAI calls on Congress
to pass Violence Against Women Act
Join the Conversation