Judge agrees to keep some Dakota Access spill information secret
Friday, April 7, 2017
More on: cheyenne river sioux, dakota access pipeline, donald trump, james boasberg, north dakota, phmsa, standing rock sioux, usace
Musician Taboo performs at the Native Nations Rise rally at the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 10,
2017. Photo by Indianz.Com / More
The wealthy backers of the Dakota Access
Pipeline will be able to keep some oil spill information out of the public's eyes as tribes continue to resist the controversial project.
A federal judge on Friday agreed to redact portions of five oil spill documents in order to address safety and security concerns about the pipeline. But he did so only because he said the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers rode to the company's rescue.
Without the federal government's help, Judge James
E. Boasberg might not have granted the protective order sought by the firm. In fact, when it came to a majority of the 11 documents at issue, he said Dakota Access came up far short.
"Dakota Access offers very little in the way of specific facts to support its argument that terrorists or other individuals with malicious intent might use this information to craft a plan to harm the pipeline in a way that causes the greatest damage," Boasberg wrote in the 13-page decision.
The ruling resolves one of the outstanding issues in the ongoing litigation.
Leaders of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne
River Sioux Tribe had long been calling on the firm to make all of the information about the pipeline public in order for everyone assess its environmental impacts.
While the tribes are able to use the documents and refer to them in their court filings, the public won't be able to access a total of 50 redactions agreed to by Boasberg. The information appears to be significant in nature in addressing oil spills.
The secret information includes "maps of DAPL at certain crossings, the names of pipeline segments when paired with timelines for detecting and shutting down spills, graphs of spill-risk scores at various points along the pipeline, maps of spill scenarios and predictions as to the volume of oil that would be released, the names of systems used to monitor the pipeline for leaks, and methods of communication with those monitoring systems," the decision reads.
A portion of Judge James Boasberg's ruling regarding a protective order sought by the wealthy backers of the Dakota Access Pipeline. Source: Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Yet Boasberg said the company offered little in terms of facts when it initially made the request for a protective order. "Fortunately for Dakota Access," he wrote, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, a different federal agency, reviewed the documents at the request of the Army Corps.
Based on that agency's recommendations, Boasberg agreed to the 50 redactions in those five documents. The information includes oil spill modeling at two locations in North Dakota and three more in Illinois, according to the decision.
As for six remaining documents, Boasberg ruled against Dakota Access completely. He said the firm failed to show why the public should not be able to see the full contents of geographic-response plans and a prevention-and-response plan.
But the value of this set of information does not appear to be as great. The geographic-response plans, according to the decision, consists of phone numbers of local agencies and law enforcement along the route of the 1,172-mile pipeline.
The prevention-and-response plan is more specific and is potentially of more interest to the public: it refers to the path of the pipeline at Lake Oahe along the Missouri River. That's where the firm engaged in horizontal directional drilling, or HDD, under the waters in order to compete the project.
Dakota Access, according to the ruling, "requests the masking of the name, location, and mile post of each crossing at which HDD services were provided, as well as the length of HDD pipe."
Judge Boasberg said the information does not "implicate the security concerns Dakota Access raises" so he said all of the contents of the plan must be made public.
Xiuhtezcatl Martinez, a 16-year-old musician who is one of the young plaintiffs in a climate change lawsuit against the federal government, performs at the Native Nations Rise rally at the White House in Washington,
D.C., on March 10, 2017. Photo by Indianz.Com / More
The Lake Oahe site, located less than a half-mile north of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, was the focal point of the #NoDAPL movement.
In December, the Obama administration ordered an environmental impact statement to address concerns about treaty rights, sacred sites and water resources.
But everything changed when President
Donald Trump came into power. Four days after taking office on January 20, he ordered his administration to engage in an "expedited" review of the pipeline.
Barely two weeks later, the Army Corps granted permission for Dakota Access to complete work at Lake Oahe and the environmental review altogether was canceled altogether. Tribal leaders weren't consulted prior to the decision -- Standing Rock Chairman Dave Archambault II was in a plane on his way to a meeting at the White House when it happened and Cheyenne River Chairman Harold Frazier was told after the fact in a phone call.
The tribes are now asking Boasberg to set aside the Trump administration's approval. Although the pipeline is now finished -- Dakota Access completed work in about 49 days, far faster than anticipated --
they believe a favorable decision will require the firm to stop shipping oil along the route, which runs through North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa and Illinois.
The tribes respective motions for summary judgement are pending before Boasberg. So are similar request from the Army Corps and Dakota Access.
It's not clear when Boasberg will make a decision because briefing is still occurring. And while Dakota Access has finished the pipeline and has placed oil beneath Lake Oahe, the project is not yet fully operational.
The firm, however, has stopped providing weekly updates to the court about its progress.
of #NoDAPL encampment convicted of sexually abusing minor (4/7)
reporter Jenni Monet wins award for work at Standing Rock (4/6)
ask Army Corps to explain decision on Dakota Access (4/6)
Sun News Today: Tribes focus on banks, courts in DAPL fight (4/5)
Cook: Unity lost after #NoDAPL camps close in North Dakota (3/29)
boasts about approvals for Dakota Access and Keystone XL (3/28)
Rock Sioux Tribe acknowledges 'setback' in pipeline war (3/28)
River Sioux Tribe continues to battle pipeline in court (3/28)
Access confirms pipeline about to go into service with oil (3/27)
Van Gelder: Huge bank divests from Dakota Access Pipeline (3/27)
Midge: There's a happy ending for Standing Rock out there (3/27)
mount another fight after Trump approves another pipeline (3/24)
LaPier: Why water remains sacred to indigenous peoples (3/23)
LaDuke: North Dakota spreads filth about water protectors (3/23)
Access submits another status update entirely under seal (3/22)
Dakota Republican keeps pushing bill for non-Indian casinos (3/21)
Access won't reveal latest status of pipeline to the public (3/20)
River Sioux Tribe sees another Dakota Access setback (3/20)
Museum of American Indian expresses 'regret' for incident (3/17)
Sun News Today: 'We're still here and we're not going away'(3/17)
dwindling for tribes as Dakota Access readies to move oil (3/13)
citizens rally in nation's capital to send message to Trump (3/10)
Thousands march to White House for Native Nations Rise (3/10)
Large crowd for Native Nations Rise rally at White House (3/10)
Access defends effort to keep oil spill documents secret (3/9)
Sun News Today: Water protectors take DAPL fight to DC (3/9)
Star Comes Out: Water protectors experienced raw trauma (3/9)
refuses to halt Dakota Access as pipeline nears completion (3/7)
Access revises timeline after making 'very good progress' (3/6)
Rock Sioux Tribe leads Native Nations Rise march in DC (3/6)
group raises funds for Water Protector legal fund (3/6)
expected this week on injunction against Dakota Access (3/6)
Access trying to keep documents from tribes and public (3/2)
confirms Dakota Access ally to lead Energy Department (3/2)
to approve non-Indian casinos in North Dakota called 'racist' (3/2)
Dakota gains financially with completion of Dakota Access (3/2)
Sun News Today: Evictions end historic #NoDAPL campsite (3/1)
LaDuke: Water protectors are still standing strong all over (3/1)
River Sioux Tribe waiting on Dakota Access injunction (2/28)
d'Errico: Yankton Sioux Tribe battles Dakota Access in court (2/28)
Nation citizens seek to join Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit (2/27)
Access files another status update on construction work (2/27)
Trahant: The story of Standing Rock won't be going away (2/27)
Monet: Tribes continue fight as #NoDAPL camps evicted (2/27)
Bender: The war against Dakota Access can still be won (2/27)
Rock Sioux Tribe blasts Trump claim of 'constant contact' (2/24)
River Sioux Tribe calls out Trump 'lies' on Dakota Access (2/24)
River Sioux Tribe slams Trump for lack of consultation (2/23)
Country joins legal push to block Dakota Access Pipeline (2/22)
Access offers up March 6 as earliest date for completion (2/22)
administration opposes injunction against Dakota Access (2/22)
team puts hold on pro-tribal Dakota Access legal opinion (2/22)
Sun News Today: #NoDAPL campsites see their final days (2/22)
Cook-Lynn: Dakota Access is everything wrong with US (2/22)
Rock Sioux Tribe hopes to see return of casino business (2/21)
Gilio-Whitaker: Sen. Hoeven raises red flags in Indian Country (2/20)
of Indian Affairs issues 'trespass' notice to #NoDAPL camp (2/17)
on injunction against Dakota Access moved to February 28 (2/17)
Department formally cancels Dakota Access Pipeline review (2/16)
Sun News Today: Dakota Access firms see spills, explosions (2/16)
Giago Davies: Tribes face bigger threat than Dakota Access (2/16)
Mills: Tribes turn to courts to battle Dakota Access Pipeline (2/16)
Rock leader vows to 'forgive' despite White House slight (2/15)
Socialist: Voices from water protectors at Standing Rock (2/15)
leader of key House panel defends handling of Dakota Access (2/14)
Access ready to start transporting oil sooner than expected (2/13)
tribes join effort to halt completion of Dakota Access Pipeline (2/13)
Corps gave go ahead to Dakota Access Pipeline in key memo (2/13)
Trahant: Battle over Dakota Access Pipeline is far from over (2/13)
head back to court in hopes of halting Dakota Access Pipeline (2/10)
Access pushes to finish pipeline with Army Corps easement (2/9)
Charles: The real reason Trump hasn't heard about #NoDAPL (2/9)
Giago Davies: Dakota Access battle has got us divided again (2/9)
promise fight to keep Dakota Access Pipeline out of homeland (2/8)
Dakota Access document from Army Corps wasn't filed in court (2/8)
Gabriel Ware & James Trimarco: City breaks with bank over DAPL (2/8)
Loeffelholz Dunn: In defense of Native journalist Jenni Monet (2/8)
Luger: Media is still trying to divide and conquer our people (2/8)
d'Errico: Even Donald Trump can't trample over tribal treaties (2/8)
Carmen/Roberto Borrero: Trump's slash and burn on treaties (2/8)
administration formally approves easement for Dakota Access (2/7)
Trahant: Native journalist charged by North Dakota authorities (2/7)
Bender: Donald Trump goes blitzkrieg on #NoDAPL movement (2/7)
Access offers timeline as Trump finalizes decision on pipeline (2/6)
Bravebull Allard: Indigenous nations must stand our ground (2/6)
Monet: I got arrested for reporting on the #NoDAPL movement (2/6)
Cook: Now it is time for all of us to stand down at Standing Rock (2/6)
Madeson: More tribes joining with #DefundDAPL movement (2/3)
Trahant: Donald Trump's 'logic' on the Dakota Access Pipeline (2/1)
LaDuke: Tribes emboldened by resistance at Standing Rock (2/1)
Sun News Today: Tribes push back on Trump's pipeline orders (2/1)
Copyright © Indianz.Com