BIA continues work on gaming land regulation
Monday, December 4, 2006
The Bureau of Indian Affairs is still taking comments on a new set of rules that would guide how land is taken into trust for casino projects.
The agency released the regulation back in October amid heightened scrutiny of the $23 billion Indian gaming industry. Republican members of Congress were pushing legislation that would have limited the ability of tribes to acquire land for new casinos.
But with one bill defeated and its sponsor voted out of office on Election Day, and another measure locked up in the Senate, the BIA is chugging forward with its proposal. Tribes have two more weeks,
until December 19, to send in their comments.
"We think it's a good regulation," Mark Van Norman, the executive director of the National Indian Gaming Association, said at the recent Global Gaming Expo in Las Vegas. NIGA opposed legislative changes but endorsed the rule-making process.
The rules, for the first time, establish guidelines for the acquisition of land under Section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act. The section lays out four exceptions under which tribes can open casinos on land taken into trust after 1988.
The first exception applies to Oklahoma tribes with former reservations. Another is for tribes who are recognized through the BIA process or through acts of Congress.
The third covers tribes who were restored to federal recognition. The final exception applies to tribes who have settled land claims.
If a tribe fails to meet one or more of the exceptions, Section 20 contains another mechanism for opening casinos. Known as the two-part determination, these applications must gain approval from the BIA and concurrence of the state governor.
In the history of IGRA, the two-part determination has only been successful three times. The land claim exception has been used twice, by the same tribe in New York.
The newly recognized and restored tribe exceptions have been utilized far more often as has the Oklahoma exception. Indianz.Com counted more than 30 casino approvals under these exceptions.
In weighing applications under the exceptions, the BIA will follow the language of IGRA. No drastic changes are being made to the land-into-trust process, but tribes and their advocates
have been paying close attention to the rules to make sure no additional restrictions are imposed on them.
BIA officials say they aren't breaking new ground with the regulation. "To a large degree the regulations are a continuation of existing practices," George Skibine, the head of the Office of Indian Gaming Management, said at one of the consultation sessions this year.
With only a few days left in the 109th Congress, tribes also have been watching any last-minute maneuvers on Capitol Hill. So far, they haven't seen any attempts at "midnight riders"
on appropriations or other pieces of legislation.
When Democrats take control of the House and Senate for the 110th Congress, tribal advocates except some of the heat to be taken off gaming. "There's a feeling in Indian Country that Indian education and Indian health have been neglected," said Van Norman.
"I think there will be renewed interest in those issues in the next Congress," he predicted.
Section 20 Regulations:
Notice of Extension |
Text |
PDF
NIGA Resolutions:
Section
20 |
IGRA
Amendments
Relevant Documents:
Kevin Gover
Testimony |
Aurene
Martin Testimony |
Title
25 CFR Part 151 Land-into-Trust Process |
Section 20
of IGRA |
GAO
Report
Pombo IGRA Bill:
H.R.4893
[As Passed by Committee] |
H.R.4893
[As Introduced] |
MP3: House
Resources Committee Debate |
Substitute
|
Explanation
McCain IGRA Bill:
S.2078
|
Senate
Indian Affairs Committee Report
Relevant Links:
Senate Indian Affairs Committee -
http://indian.senate.govNIGC
Indian Land Determinations -
http://www.nigc.gov/nigc/nigcControl?option=LAND_DETERMINATIONS
National Indian Gaming Association -
http://www.indiangaming.org
Related Stories:
Case blocking out-of-state casino dismissed
(11/06)
Michigan tribe gets land-into-trust date in
2007 (11/03)
Another GAO report looks at land-into-trust
(10/25)
Tribal gaming still faces challenges in
Congress (10/09)
BIA publishes rules for Section 20
gaming acquisitions (10/5)
NIGC's Class
II rules come under fire from tribes (9/20)
Editorial: Pombo's RIGHT Act fails to live up to
its name (09/14)
Controversial IGRA bill
fails on House floor (9/13)
IGRA bill up
for big vote on House floor (9/12)
Indian gaming act amendments face time crunch
(07/31)
House committee approves IGRA
amendments (7/27)
NIGA opposes
Rep. Pombo's IGRA amendments (7/27)
Tribal
gaming revenues reach $23 billion (7/12)
Bush administration pushes Class II gaming
proposal (06/20)
IGRA amendments sent to
Senate floor (6/16)
Report cites impact,
growth of tribal gaming in California (06/01)
NIGC releases draft of casino licensing
regulations (05/19)
Indianz.Com launches
Casino Stalker to track casinos (05/15)
Group's list inflates off-reservation gaming
proposals (04/20)
NIGA supports gaming rules but opposes McCain
bill (04/11)
BIA expects more
off-reservation gaming applications (4/6)
BIA holds consultation on Section 20 regulations
(3/31)
Tribal gaming industry due for
some changes (3/30)
BIA sets meetings
for Section 20 regulations (3/28)
Off-reservation casino sites still in question
(3/16)
Listening Lounge: Hearing
on off-reservation gaming (3/15)
BIA sets
timetable for new gaming regulations (03/01)
Senate panel presses BIA on gaming regulations
(02/02)
BIA takes stab at land-into-trust
for gaming rules (2/1)
Witness
list for hearing on off-reservation gaming (1/31)
Senate panel delves into gaming again for 2006
(01/25)
Lobbying reform, gaming high on
Congressional agenda (01/20)
Appeals
court sides with tribe in trust land dispute (01/09)
IGRA amendments tough on many, especially
tribes (12/12)
Oklahoma tribe hires
ex-BIA official to lobby for land (12/01)
McCain proposes major amendments to IGRA
(11/30)
NIGC adopts new approach for tribal
gaming sites (11/14)
Tribes dispute
local power over trust land decisions (11/10)
DOJ releases proposed changes to Indian gaming
law (10/06)
DOJ gaming proposal
shows changes to Johnson Act (10/05)
BIA
official revives off-reservation land regulations (09/21)
DOJ proposes major change in Indian gaming law
(09/16)
Gaming clouds already lengthy
land-into-trust process (09/15)
Oklahoma
tribe plans state's largest gaming facility (08/02)
NIGC develops system to track Indian lands
(07/28)
Perception and realities in
land-into-trust debate (05/19)
Land into
trust to be examined at Senate hearing (5/10)
Land-into-trust problems aired at Senate hearing
(4/28)
Update: Senate hearing on Indian
gaming (04/27)
BIA backs bill to delay
off-reservation casino (04/06)
Off-reservation casinos a concern at gaming
summit (03/30)
Bush stance on
off-reservation gaming unknown (03/29)
Exceptions to IGRA more common than often cited
(03/21)
Off-reservation casino dropped as
debate continues (03/21)
Off-reservation
gaming hearing set by Pombo (3/15)
Agencies still in conflict over off-reservation
gaming (12/07)
McCaleb calls Chickasaws
savvy, not deceptive (10/26)
Official
tells Chickasaw land-into-trust tactics (10/25)
Cole says Chickasaw Nation made promises on
land (09/16)
BIA approves compact for
gaming on former reservation (03/25)
Chickasaw Nation land purchases quadruple
(03/23)
Hogen says Okla. tribes
skirting federal gaming law (05/19)
Indian gaming law not always followed
(5/14)
Okla. tribe
leaps over Indian gaming hurdles (04/23)
Chickasaw Nation 'followed the
law' (6/28)
Tribe's land
approvals questioned (6/11)
Copyright © 2000-2006 Indianz.Com
Subscribe