Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP
ads@blueearthmarketing.com   712.224.5420

Health | Law | National | Politics | Trust
White House blocked testimony on trust responsibility


INDIANZ.COM LISTENING LOUNGE
Opening Statements

Panel 1

Q&A | Q&A

Webcast
The White House changed the Senate testimony of Bush administration nominee Charles Grim to eliminate references to two federal laws that provide the basis for Indian health care.

Grim, the director of the Indian Health Service, told the Senate Indian Affairs Committee on Thursday that he didn't know why the language was removed from his testimony. "Sometimes, changes are made," he said, describing a review process that includes the White House Office of Management and Budget.

But the revision raised alarms from Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-North Dakota), the chairman of the committee. He tied it to the Bush administration's failure to back the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, one of the laws that was removed by the White House.

"You have previously indicated to this committee that you believe there is a trust responsibility rooted in law for the health care for Native Americans," he told Grim. "Is there a disagreement on that in the administration?

Grim denied any sort of "misunderstanding" that the IHCIA and the Snyder Act of 1921 form the basis for the federal government's responsibility to provide health care. At the same time, he could not explain why references to those two laws were removed.

"It was not communicated to me the exact rationale for that," Grim testified.

Just a few months ago, in fact, Grim and another colleague from the Department of Health and Human Services submitted testimony to the committee that cited the laws. "Two major statutes are at the core of the federal government's responsibility for meeting the health needs of American Indians/Alaska Natives," the statement from March said.

In prior appearances before the panel, Grim included nearly identical language about the IHCIA and the Snyder Act. At the hearing yesterday, he said he stood by those statements.

But with the White House holding up reauthorization of the IHCIA, those assurances weren't enough for members of the committee. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), the new vice chair, urged Grim to do more to ensure the bill gets passed this year.

"It's been sitting around for 10 years-plus," Murkowski said. "It's well past time to get this to the president for his signature."

The change in the testimony, however minimal, speaks to a much larger policy shift within the administration. Officials have been slowly trying to limit who can and cannot receive federal health care benefits.

Although the two federal laws, along with treaties, have long been cited as the basis for Indian health care, the administration argues that services must be tied to membership in a recognized tribe and residence on a reservation. That affects the overwhelming majority of American Indians and Alaska Natives who don't live on reservations.

The Department of Justice says health care programs for urban Indians, lineal descendants and certain Alaska Natives could be struck down by the courts as unconstitutional because they are based on race. However, that has never happened in the history of the Indian health care system.

"Under the Supreme Court's decisions, there is a substantial likelihood that legislation providing special benefits to individuals of Indian or Alaska Native descent based on something other than membership or equivalent affiliation with a federally recognized tribe would be regarded by the courts as a racial classification," a deputy assistant attorney general told the committee back in March.

The revision to Grim's testimony isn't the first time the White House has intervened on a trust issue either. In July 2002, White House aides tried to prevent then-Special Trustee Tom Slonaker from telling the committee that the Bush administration's accounting plan was inadequate.

Slonaker went ahead and gave the testimony but was told to resign or be fired a few days later. One of the White House aides who was involved -- Kyle Sampson -- later went to work for the Department of Justice but resigned amid the scandal over the firings of several U.S. Attorneys.

Grim, a member of the Cherokee Nation, was before the committee to seek confirmation for a second term as director of the IHS. Dorgan, Murkowski and other members said they would support his nomination.

The following language was removed from Grim's testimony:
Two major statutes are at the core of the Federal government's responsibility for meeting the health needs of American Indians/Alaska Natives: The Snyder Act of 1921, P.L.67 85, and the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA), P.L. 94 437, as amended. The Snyder Act authorized regular appropriations for "the relief of distress and conservation of health" of American Indians/Alaska Natives. The IHCIA was enacted "to implement the Federal responsibility for the care and education of the Indian people by improving the services and facilities of Federal Indian health programs and encouraging maximum participation of Indians in such programs."

Hearing Webcast/Testimony:
HEARING on the nomination of Charles W. Grim to be Director of the Indian Health Service (July 26, 2007)

Relevant Links:
Indian Health Service - http://www.ihs.gov
Senate Indian Affairs Committee - http://indian.senate.gov

Related Stories:
Senate confirmation hearing for Dr. Grim of IHS (7/26)
Direct Service Tribes discuss IHS in Denver (06/27)
Emergency room at IHS facility fails inspection (05/09)
Indian Health Care Act introduced in Senate (05/02)
California tribes seek bigger share of health funding (5/1)
Belcourt: Indian Country takes path of healthy living (4/30)
House committee approves Indian health care bill (4/26)
Montana and Wyoming tribes host health conference (04/06)
Montana lawmaker presses for health care funding (4/5)
Opinion: U.S. failing to provide Indian health care (3/22)
Kara Briggs: The fight to reauthorize IHCIA (3/21)
Urban Indians hurt by IHS policy in Montana (3/20)
Health care push continues at House hearing (3/19)
DOJ's Indian white paper a political whodunit (3/14)
House hearing on Indian Health Care Improvement (3/14)
Urban Indians under attack over health care (3/12)
Fireworks at Indian health care hearing (3/9)
Senate hearing on Indian Health reauthorization (3/8)
Urban Indians in New Mexico feel left out on health (3/8)
Some urban Indians denied care at request of IHS (3/8)
Indian Health Care Act introduced in House (3/7)
Hearings on Indian Health Care Improvement Act (3/5)
Democrats promise action at USET conference (2/14)
Harjo: GOP calls Indian health care 'race-based' (2/12)
Tribes forced to ration funds for health services (2/2)
Interview: Inadequate health care in Indian Country (01/16)
Joint hearing on Indian health care act postponed (11/14)
Final push for health care bill in 109th Congress (11/13)
White House hit over delays in health care and Cobell (10/05)
Still no Indian Health Care Improvement Act (09/22)
New Standard: U.S. failing to deliver health care (7/18)
Senate panel advances Indian health care measure (10/28)
Senate committee takes up slate of Indian bills (10/27)
Hearing on Indian Health Care Improvement Act (07/13)
Oklahoma senator loses Indian health care vote (06/29)