Supreme Court reverses tribal jurisdiction ruling
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Filed Under:
Law
The
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of South Dakota does not have jurisdiction over a non-Indian bank doing business on the reservation, the
U.S. Supreme Court ruled today.
In
Plains
Commerce Bank v. Long, tribal members sued
Plains Commerce Bank of South Dakota for breach of contract and discrimination. A federal judge and the
8th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the bank was subject to tribal jurisdiction.
By a 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court reversed. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John G. Roberts characterized the dispute as the sale of a fee land, rather than of one that affects a tribe's authority to regulate the activities of non-Indians on the reservation.
"The distinction between sale of the land and conduct on it is well-established in our precedent, as the foregoing cases demonstrate, and entirely logical given the limited nature of tribal sovereignty and the liberty interests of nonmembers," Roberts wrote for the court. Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito joined the opinion.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a dissent. She said tribal courts are the proper place to resolve a dispute involving a non-Indian bank that voluntarily entered into a business agreement with tribal members.
"Sales of land -- and related conduct -- are surely 'activities' within the ordinary sense of the word," Ginsburg wrote. The dissent was joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter and Stephen G. Breyer.
Supreme Court Decision:
Plains Commerce Bank v. Long
(June 25, 2008)
Relevant Documents:
Oral
Argument Transcript |
Docket Sheet:
No. 07-411 |
Briefs
on the Merits
Appeals Court Decision:
Plains
Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land and Cattle Company (June 26, 2007)
Lower Court Decision:
Plains
Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land and Cattle Company (July 18, 2006)
Related Stories:
Supreme Court rulings awaited in Indian Country
(6/24)
Ruling in Plains Commerce case expected by
July (6/5)
Joe Martin: Tribal
jurisdiction over non-Indians (5/1)
Opinion: Disrespect at the Supreme Court (4/28)
Supreme Court hears tribal jurisdiction case
(4/15)
Legal Times: Italians and Indians
at high court (4/15)
Supreme Court to
hear jurisdiction case (4/14)
DOJ to
join argument in tribal court jurisdiction case (4/3)
Bush brief backs tribal court jurisdiction
(3/24)
Opinion: No tribal jurisdiction
over non-Indians (3/3)
Supreme Court
agrees to hear tribal jurisdiction case (1/8)
Appeals court upholds tribal verdict in bank loan
case (6/28)
9th Circuit vacates tribal
jurisdiction ruling (2/2)
Court subjects
non-Indian bank to tribal laws (7/20)
Appeals court upholds tribal jurisdiction after
rehearing (01/11)
Copyright © Indianz.Com
Subscribe