indianz.com your internet resource indianz.com on facebook indianz.com on twitter indianz.com on Google+ indianz.com on soundcloud
phone: 202 630 8439
The Rise of Tribes and the Fall of Federal Indian Law
Advertise on Indianz.Com
Home > News > Headlines
Print   Subscribe
EEOC confirms difference between tribal and Indian preference

Filed Under: Business | Law | National
More on: cter, dc, eeoc, employment, indian preference, meetings, ncai
     

Tribal preference in employment is not the same as Indian preference, the top attorney for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said on Tuesday.

Many tribes give preference to their members when it comes to filling positions at their enterprises. Many also recognize Indian preference.

But tribal preference is not protected by federal law, EEOC general counsel David Lopez told the National Congress of American Indians. So the agency views it in the same category as discrimination against someone based on national origin.

"There is longstanding policy at the commission that interprets Indian preference to mean Indian preference, that you can grant preference to any other Indian, regardless of the tribe," Lopez said at NCAI's 2013 executive council winter session in Washington, D.C.

On the other hand, the commission "takes the position that tribal preference constitutes national origin discrimination," Lopez added.

Lopez, however, noted that the issue remains under litigation. In a particularly messy dispute, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals allowed EEOC to sue the Navajo Nation and Peabody Energy for a tribal preference policy at mines on the reservation.

There's been no ruling on the merits in the lower courts. But the decision could lead EEOC to assert authority over a broad range of employment issues at tribal enterprises, an attorney for the Council for Tribal Employment Rights warned.

"The danger is another San Manuel," said Dan Press, the group's legal counsel, referring to the infamous case in which the National Labor Relations Board asserted jurisdiction over labor issues at tribal businesses that employ non-Indians.

With over 1 million people working at tribal enterprises, a figure that includes many non-Indians, litigation of that nature poses a threat to sovereignty. So Press urged tribes to consider entering into agreements with EEOC to address employment discrimination matters.

"What EEOC is saying is -- tribes, you do it with you own sovereignty and that way we won't have to do it," Press told tribal leaders.

Tribes must adopt an anti-discrimination law in order to enter into an agreement with EEOC, Press said. A sample memorandum of understanding is on the EEOC web site.

9th Circuit Decision:
EEOC v. Peabody (June 23, 2010)

Related Stories:
Supreme Court declines Navajo employment preference case (10/3)


Copyright © Indianz.Com
More headlines...
Stay Connected:
On Facebook

On Twitter

On Google+

On SoundCloud
Local Links:
Federal Register | Indian Gaming | Jobs & Notices | In The Hoop | Message Board
Latest News:
Tribal Tribune: Unity at Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's #NoDAPL camp (8/26)
Dakota Access Pipeline lacks key approval to build by reservation (8/26)
Lummi Nation sends totem pole to sacred camp in North Dakota (8/26)
Winona LaDuke: Corporate interests come to destroy our mother (8/26)
Sarah Sunshine Manning: Pipeline campaign awakens our people (8/26)
Ho-Chunk citizen Sharice Davids named as a White House Fellow (8/26)
Leech Lake Band celebrates groundbreaking for new high school (8/26)
Mark Trahant: Native candidates face voters in Arizona primary (8/26)
Native Sun News: Mother charged in beating death of 2-year-old (8/26)
Lakota Country Times: Oglala veteran pushed for Black Elk Peak (8/26)
Jeffrey Whalen: Oglala Sioux Tribe continues to get nothing done (8/26)
Leon Matthews: Off The Rez Ramblings heads back to Pine Ridge (8/26)
Erica Pinto: Jamul Indian Village planning to debut casino 'soon' (8/26)
Harold Monteau: Tribal lending industry facing major challenges (8/26)
Winnebago Tribe becomes first with non-smoking room at casino (8/26)
Tlingit and Haida Tribes win federal approval of gaming ordinance (8/26)
Poarch Creeks won't see Class III gaming after lottery effort fails (8/26)
Dave Archambault: Why the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe is fighting (8/25)
Sen. Bernie Sanders joining opposition to Dakota Access Pipeline (8/25)
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe chair dispels rumors about camp site (8/25)
Native Sun News: Thousands join pipeline resistance movement (8/25)
Lakota Country Times: Bill honors memory of Cheyenne woman (8/25)
John Yellow Bird Steele: A giant step forward with Black Elk Peak (8/25)
Dina Gilio-Whitaker: There's more than one path to reconciliation (8/25)
Spokane Tribe hit hard as blaze destroys homes on reservation (8/25)
Hopi Tribe struggling to address high levels of arsenic in water (8/25)
Osage Nation celebrates $74M purchase of ancestral territory (8/25)
Former Navajo Nation lawmakers sentenced over fund misuse (8/25)
Ute Tribe remains busy in court with appeal in contract dispute (8/25)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe hails bid to reconsider casino ruling (8/25)
Twenty-Nine Palms Band considers expansion project at casino (8/25)
Grand Traverse Band shares gaming funds with local community (8/25)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe sees strong support at pipeline hearing (8/24)
Judge takes aim at Ute Tribe after being kicked off sovereignty suit (8/24)
Lakota Country Times: County seeks compensation for trust lands (8/24)
Native Sun News: Sage remains a special plant for Native peoples (8/24)
more headlines...

Home | Arts & Entertainment | Business | Canada | Cobell Lawsuit | Education | Environment | Federal Recognition | Federal Register | Forum | Health | Humor | Indian Gaming | Indian Trust | Jack Abramoff Scandal | Jobs & Notices | Law | National | News | Opinion | Politics | Sports | Technology | World

Indianz.Com Terms of Service | Indianz.Com Privacy Policy
About Indianz.Com | Advertise on Indianz.Com

Indianz.Com is a product of Noble Savage Media, LLC and Ho-Chunk, Inc.