indianz.com your internet resource indianz.com on facebook indianz.com on twitter indianz.com on Google+ indianz.com on soundcloud
phone: 202 630 8439
Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP
Advertise on Indianz.Com
Home > News > Headlines
Print   Subscribe
EEOC confirms difference between tribal and Indian preference

Filed Under: Business | Law | National
More on: cter, dc, eeoc, employment, indian preference, meetings, ncai
     

Tribal preference in employment is not the same as Indian preference, the top attorney for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said on Tuesday.

Many tribes give preference to their members when it comes to filling positions at their enterprises. Many also recognize Indian preference.

But tribal preference is not protected by federal law, EEOC general counsel David Lopez told the National Congress of American Indians. So the agency views it in the same category as discrimination against someone based on national origin.

"There is longstanding policy at the commission that interprets Indian preference to mean Indian preference, that you can grant preference to any other Indian, regardless of the tribe," Lopez said at NCAI's 2013 executive council winter session in Washington, D.C.

On the other hand, the commission "takes the position that tribal preference constitutes national origin discrimination," Lopez added.

Lopez, however, noted that the issue remains under litigation. In a particularly messy dispute, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals allowed EEOC to sue the Navajo Nation and Peabody Energy for a tribal preference policy at mines on the reservation.

There's been no ruling on the merits in the lower courts. But the decision could lead EEOC to assert authority over a broad range of employment issues at tribal enterprises, an attorney for the Council for Tribal Employment Rights warned.

"The danger is another San Manuel," said Dan Press, the group's legal counsel, referring to the infamous case in which the National Labor Relations Board asserted jurisdiction over labor issues at tribal businesses that employ non-Indians.

With over 1 million people working at tribal enterprises, a figure that includes many non-Indians, litigation of that nature poses a threat to sovereignty. So Press urged tribes to consider entering into agreements with EEOC to address employment discrimination matters.

"What EEOC is saying is -- tribes, you do it with you own sovereignty and that way we won't have to do it," Press told tribal leaders.

Tribes must adopt an anti-discrimination law in order to enter into an agreement with EEOC, Press said. A sample memorandum of understanding is on the EEOC web site.

9th Circuit Decision:
EEOC v. Peabody (June 23, 2010)

Related Stories:
Supreme Court declines Navajo employment preference case (10/3)


Copyright © Indianz.Com
More headlines...
Stay Connected:
On Facebook

On Twitter

On Google+

On SoundCloud
Local Links:
Federal Register | Indian Gaming | Jobs & Notices | In The Hoop | Message Board
Latest News:
Mary Annette Pember: Indigenous people can't ever back down (2/21)
Harold Monteau: Democrats to blame for President Donald Trump (2/21)
Tohono O'odham Nation leaders share concerns about border wall (2/21)
Pacific Northwest tribes finally rebury remains of Kennewick Man (2/21)
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe hopes to see return of casino business (2/21)
Mohegan Tribe said gaming executive didn't disclose stake in firm (2/21)
Tribal sovereignty foe in charge of nation's environmental agenda (2/20)
Trump gets another extension in Supreme Court tribal casino case (2/20)
Senate finally ready to consider nomination of Ryan Zinke for DOI (2/20)
Senate Indian Affairs Committee sets hearing on Trump 'priorities' (2/20)
Tim Giago: Our Lakota children are dying while we wring our hands (2/20)
Mark Trahant: Indian programs gain 'high risk' label at worst time (2/20)
Native Sun News Today: 'Haven For Hope' proposed for homeless (2/20)
Ivan Star Comes Out: 'Civilization' aims to alienate Native America (2/20)
Cronkite News: Navajo leader pleads to Trump to help power plant (2/20)
André Cramblit: Sorry but Indian Country just got 'Trumped' again (2/20)
Dina Gilio-Whitaker: Sen. Hoeven raises red flags in Indian Country (2/20)
Peter d'Errico: Indian Country's 'trustee' isn't trustworthy anymore (2/20)
Raymond Hitchcock: The facts about Wilton Rancheria's casino plan (2/20)
Wilton Rancheria seeks to join lawsuit as gaming site is put in trust (2/20)
Tribes find common ground with Trump on Supreme Court nominee (2/17)
Bureau of Indian Affairs issues 'trespass' notice to #NoDAPL camp (2/17)
Hearing on injunction against Dakota Access moved to February 28 (2/17)
Native Sun News Today: Drilling test in treaty territory stirs concern (2/17)
Editorial: Presidents on Mount Rushmore didn't treat tribes so well (2/17)
Native women pushing for action on missing and murdered sisters (2/16)
Army Department formally cancels Dakota Access Pipeline review (2/16)
Native Sun News Today: Dakota Access firms see spills, explosions (2/16)
James Giago Davies: Tribes face bigger threat than Dakota Access (2/16)
Cronkite News: Navajo school official worried about Trump era cuts (2/16)
Monte Mills: Tribes turn to courts to battle Dakota Access Pipeline (2/16)
Steven Newcomb: Dakota Access marks growth of imperial empire (2/16)
Vena A-dae Romero: Bringing our tribes out of obesity & diabetes (2/16)
more headlines...

Home | Arts & Entertainment | Business | Canada | Cobell Lawsuit | Education | Environment | Federal Recognition | Federal Register | Forum | Health | Humor | Indian Gaming | Indian Trust | Jack Abramoff Scandal | Jobs & Notices | Law | National | News | Opinion | Politics | Sports | Technology | World

Indianz.Com Terms of Service | Indianz.Com Privacy Policy
About Indianz.Com | Advertise on Indianz.Com

Indianz.Com is a product of Noble Savage Media, LLC and Ho-Chunk, Inc.