Long wait continues for decision in tribal court jurisdiction dispute


Native women rallied at the U.S. Supreme Court on December 7, 2015, as the justices heard Dollar General Corporation v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, a tribal jurisdiction case. Photo by Indianz.Com

Indian Country's long wait for a decision in Dollar General Corporation v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians, a closely-watched tribal jurisdiction dispute, continues as the U.S. Supreme Court nears the end of its current term.

The justices issued another round of decisions on Monday -- including one in an Indian Country domestic violence case -- but Dollar General remains under wraps. It's been 189 days since oral arguments on December 7, 2015, and the court appears unable to resolve a dispute that will determine whether the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians can exercise authority over Dollar General, a non-Indian company that reported $18.9 billion in net sales in 2014.

The case in fact is the oldest on the docket without a decision. Speculation about the delay centers on the absence of Justice Antonin Scalia, who died in February before the court could issue a ruling.

"I suspect it had something to do with Justice Scalia's death -- he may have been writing" the decision, Amy Howe, the editor of the influential SCOTUSBlog, wrote on Monday morning. The owner of the website, Thomas Goldstein, is representing Dollar General but Howe no longer works at the Goldstein & Russell firm.


Indianz.Com SoundCloud: U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument in Dollar General Corp. v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians December 7, 2015

If Scalia were indeed in charge of the decision, the outcome likely would have gone against Indian Country. The last tribal jurisdiction case that came before the court was Plains Commerce Bank v. Long and he joined the majority in holding that the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe lacked jurisdiction over a non-Indian bank.

The vote was 5-4 and, besides Scalia, four members of that majority are still sitting on the court. It appears unlikely that those any of those members -- a group that includes Chief Justice John G. Roberts -- have changed their minds about tribal sovereignty since that 2008 decision.

The Supreme Court is expected to issue more opinions on Thursday so it's possible that Dollar General will come this week. Or the justices could potentially wait until the end of their term on June 30 to take action.

If the justices are unable to reach a clear majority, a 4-4 decision would result in a victory for the Mississippi Band because the tribe won the case at the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

But a tie would not set a national precedent so Indian Country as a whole would not necessarily benefit from an impasse. However, tribes in the 5th Circuit, which includes Louisiana and Texas, could benefit.

Join the Conversation
Related Stories:
Supreme Court debates 'inherent' tribal sovereignty in new ruling (6/9)
Clock keeps ticking on closely-watched tribal jurisdiction dispute (06/06)
Opinion: Eight justices isn't enough for functioning Supreme Court (6/6)
Another week goes by without decision in tribal jurisdiction case (5/31)
Long wait hints at Supreme Court tie in closely-watched tribal jurisdiction case (05/23)
Supreme Court still holding onto decision in tribal jurisdiction case (5/19)
Still no decision from Supreme Court in tribal jurisdiction dispute (5/16)
Supreme Court pick puts some Indian law cases on questionnaire (05/11)
Still no decision from Supreme Court in tribal jurisdiction case (04/26)
Supreme Court still hasn't issued decision in tribal jurisdiction case (4/21)
Supreme Court case prompts defense of tribal judiciary systems (4/19)
Supreme Court ready to hear fourth Indian law case on the docket (4/18)
Bill in Senate expands tribal jurisdiction over non-Indian offenders (04/14)
Vacancy on Supreme Court already impacts high-profile cases (03/30)
Leader of Navajo Nation pushes for action on Supreme Court pick (03/22)
Chair of Sault Ste. Marie Tribe calls for action on court nominee (03/17)
Supreme Court nominee comes with some Indian law experience (03/16)
Dollar General defends plan to open in majority Native community (03/08)
Klamath Tribes oppose Dollar General store due to court challenge (03/01)
Aaron Payment: Tribal sovereignty hangs in the balance at Supreme Court (02/29)
Updates from Day 2 of National Congress of American Indians winter session in D.C. (02/24)
No Supreme Court opinions this week following Scalia's death (02/22)
Mississippi Choctaw family seeks $2.5M in Dollar General case (12/11)
Matthew Fletcher: Supreme Court takes up tribal jurisdiction case (12/8)
Native women rally at Supreme Court for tribal jurisdiction case (12/7)
Steven Newcomb: Supreme Court ready to cut sovereignty again (12/7)
Peter d'Errico: Anti-Indian forces play hardball in Supreme Court (12/7)
Mike Myers: Tribal jurisdiction opponents flock to Supreme Court (12/04)
Ned Blackhawk: Supreme Court case jeopardizes tribal rights (11/25)
Peter d'Errico: Anti-Indian wars continue in our Supreme Court (11/24)
Native women schedule Quilt Walk for Justice at Supreme Court (12/01)
Native women to rally at Supreme Court for upcoming case (11/11)
DOJ to help with arguments in Supreme Court jurisdiction case (11/09)
Vice President Joe Biden reflects on triumphs of Obama's Indian policies (10/28)
Native women defend tribal jurisdiction in Supreme Court case (10/26)
Tribes urged to bring states on board for Supreme Court case (10/20)
Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribal Tribune: Supreme Court case tests tribal jurisdiction (10/14)
Supreme Court schedules oral arguments in two Indian law cases (10/12)
States oppose tribal jurisdiction in upcoming Supreme Court case (10/07)
Bryan Newland: The racist foundation of Supreme Court rulings (09/08)
Supreme Court agrees to hear first tribal jurisdiction case in years (06/15)
Supreme Court needs more time to review tribal jurisdiction case (06/08)
SCOTUSBlog: DOJ urges denial of petition in tribal court dispute (05/20)
DOJ files brief in tribal jurisdiction case before Supreme Court (05/14)
Supreme Court asks DOJ for views in Mississippi Choctaw case (10/06)