printer friendly version
Supreme Court won't hear sacred site challenge
Tuesday, October 4, 2005
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a challenge to the U.S. Forest Service's protection of a sacred site in Wyoming.
Without comment, the justices declined to hear
Wyoming Sawmills Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 04-1175. The case comes from the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Wyoming Sawmills, a timber company, sought to challenge a Forest Service decision to restrict, but not bar, development within 23,000 acres in the Bighorn National Forest. The forest is home to Medicine Mountain, the largest medicine wheel in the U.S. that is used for ceremonies by several tribes.
The 10th Circuit ruled held that Wyoming Sawmill lacked standing to sue under the U.S. Constitution or environmental law. The company appealed, arguing that it has a right to challenge and that the Forest Service can't make decisions that advance or restrict any particular religion.
The Medicine Wheel Coalition filed a brief in the case [
Case Documents].
Relevant Links:
NARF-NCAI Tribal Supreme Court Project -
http://www.narf.org/sct/index.html
Related Stories:
>
Supreme Court wraps up October 2004 term
(06/28)
U.S. Supreme Court vacancy impacts
tribal rights (06/20)
High court won't
take on Native Hawaiian recognition (06/14)
Appeals court to rehear tribal jurisdiction
case (06/08)
Tribal authority over all
Indians still unsettled question (06/23)
Myers not included in compromise on Bush judges
(05/24)
Tribal sovereignty must be
respected, court rules (05/13)
Supreme
Court Roundup: Indian law cases rejected (04/19)
Supreme Court refuses Bush appeal of trust case
(04/19)
Supreme Court takes drug case tied
to peyote use (04/19)
Indian lawyer
cites 'hostile' atmosphere in Washington (04/15)
Contracts still an issue despite Supreme Court
win (04/14)
Oneida Nation begins
land-into-trust process (04/13)
Supreme
Court to weigh appeal of trust lawsuit (04/07)
Supreme Court Roundup: Indian law cases
rejected (04/19)
Appeals court revives
Wind River royalty fraud case (04/07)
BIA official calls high court ruling 'quite
depressing' (03/31)
Supreme Court
overturns Oneida Nation case (03/30)
Tribes win decision in contract support cost
case (03/02)
Supreme Court takes on
tribal-state tax dispute (03/01)
Passage
of time at issue in Oneida Nation case (01/12)
Supreme Court rejects two Indian law cases
(1/12)
U.S. Supreme Court decides cases
without Rehnquist (12/14)
U.S. Supreme
Court asked to rule on state taxation (12/02)
Peabody takes coal lease dispute to high court
(12/01)
Tribal contracts pose conflict
for U.S. Supreme Court (11/10)
Court to
hear self-determination contract case (11/9)
Supreme Court takes action on Indian law cases
(11/02)
Mille Lacs diminishment case before
Supreme Court (10/22)
South Dakota
challenge to tribes rejected by high court (10/19)
Supreme Court Roundup: 2003-2004 Term (07/08)
Supreme Court affirms tribal powers over all
Indians (04/20)
Supreme Court to
resolve self-determination dispute (03/23)
Cantwell stresses importance of judicial picks
(6/17)
Tribal fears in Supreme Court case go
unrealized (5/20)
Supreme Court case too
close to call for some (4/1)
Supreme
Court tussles with tribal sovereignty case (4/1)
Supreme Court case pits tribes against states
(3/31)
Supreme Court panel's predictions
mostly came true (3/19)
Appeals
court nominees draw fire (1/30)
Bush pick worked on Hicks case
(1/30)
Venetie foe up for
appeals court again (01/08)
Bush
nominee familiar with Indian law (5/9)
Indian Law and the Supreme Court
(12/11)
Copyright © 2000-2005 Indianz.Com
