Home > Indian Gaming > Litigation
ARCHIVE: 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007

(02/20)

The new deal addresses revenue sharing, free play, operational hours and gaming on newly acquired lands.

(02/20)

The tribe hasn't announced a decision but a law professor believes a case could be made in federal and state court.

(02/11)

A federal judge said it was 'reasonable' to withhold checks from people whose enrollment status is being questioned.

(02/10)

The tribe invested $1.5 million in a project that never got off the ground.

(02/05)

The Mohegans have reportedly invested $40 million in the long-delayed project.

(02/05)

The provision in question states that gaming can only on occur on lands that were in trust prior to 1988.

(02/04)

The main issue in the case is the Supreme Court decision in Carcieri v. Salazar.

(01/29)

The tribe claims the village of Union Springs is threatening to shut down the facility.

(01/26)

Our question is how much more will taxpayers have to shell out before this horse is officially laid to rest?

(01/23)

The Menominees blamed a rival tribe and the governor's presidential aspirations for the negative decision.

(01/23)

The decision to disapprove the compact strikes me as consistent with its approach in recent years to limit the scope of these types of agreements.

(01/22)

The tribe won't have to repay a $10 million loan simply because a non-Indian facility has opened in the state.

(01/22)

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C.

(01/21)

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals delivered a mixed victory to the northern California tribe.

(01/20)

The tribe has offered to close its existing casino and move operations to a larger site.

(01/16)

The Chukchansi Tribe went to court to try and stop the rival casino from moving forward.

(01/14)

The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in a lawsuit filed by the state of Alabama.

(01/13)

The tribe believes it must be compensated for losses from a rival casino.

(01/13)

Alabama's attorney general has promised to drop the case if he loses this round of litigation.

(01/12)

The tribe sets aside $1.5 million a year for scholarships and tuition programs.

(01/09)

A court hearing is scheduled for February as the casino remains closed for another month.

(01/06)

The tribe is seeking to build a Class II facility on its reservation but the state opposes the plan.

(12/29)

I get incensed when I see non-Indians forcing their dictas, or personal opinions without full support of standard case law decisions on Indians.

(12/24)

The Supreme Court's decision in Carcieri v. Salazar has thrown a wrench into the process.

(12/24)

The tribe wants a one-acre site placed in trust in order to create a buffer zone around the casino.

(12/23)

The tribe and its leaders are protected from the state's lawsuit due to sovereign immunity.

(12/22)

Guy C. Clark of Stop Predatory Gambling New Mexico predicts disaster if Pojoaque Pueblo prevails in Class III gaming compact dispute.

(12/22)

Republican control of the Senate could improve the chances for a new version of the bill.

(12/19)

The Grande Ronde Tribes fear competition will hurt their existing casino.

(12/18)

Rivals of Clint Halftown say he no longer represents the tribe and they want the case dismissed.

(12/16)

The state has asserted sovereign immunity and can't be forced to come to the table.

(12/16)

A federal judge said the activity on the Desert Rose Bingo site falls into the Class III category.

(12/16)

The tribe will remain protected by sovereign immunity in a dispute with an outside company.

(12/15)

The tribe has been pushing for the casino for over a decade.

(12/10)

A non-Indian man who lives three miles from the casino has made it clear he wants a monetary settlement from the tribe.

(12/08)

Steven Thomas was hired for the job after he pleaded guilty and remains there even though he is under a banishment order.

(12/08)

The state plans to pursue individual tribal officials due to the sovereign immunity of the tribe itself.

(12/05)

The tribe now faces two lawsuits over the Desert Rose Bingo site.

(12/04)

The tribe has been pursuing gaming for decades only to see setbacks at the polls and in Congress.

(12/03)

A lawsuit that questioned the tribe's federal status appears to be dead but another one that challenges the tribe's land status remains on the docket.

(12/02)

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals said the tribe waited too long to intervene.

(12/01)

An opposition group tried to challenge the tribe's status as a federally recognized tribe.

(11/26)

The tribe says Class II games aren't covered by the Class III gaming compact.

(11/26)

The state has refused to renew the license because the tribe won't collect a tax on sales to non-Indians.

(11/25)

Sparring continues as parties wait for a decision in a long-running lawsuit.

Stay Connected


Archive

2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004

News Topics

Advertisement

Home | Arts & Entertainment | Business | Canada | Cobell Lawsuit | Education | Environment | Federal Recognition | Federal Register | Forum | Health | Humor | Indian Gaming | Indian Trust | Jack Abramoff Scandal | Jobs & Notices | Law | National | News | Opinion | Politics | Sports | Technology | World

Indianz.Com Terms of Service | Indianz.Com Privacy Policy
About Indianz.Com | Advertise on Indianz.Com

Indianz.Com is a product of Noble Savage Media, LLC and Ho-Chunk, Inc.