Home > Indian Gaming > Litigation
ARCHIVE: 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007

(07/24)

The Senate Indian Affairs Committee heard from both sides of the issue at a lengthy oversight hearing on Indian gaming.

(07/23)

The hearing focused on federal oversight, tribal benefits and a controversial off-reservation casino in Arizona.

(07/22)

The committee hasn't paid much attention to the $28 billion tribal casino industry during so far.

(07/22)

The tribe has indicated it will submit a new land-into-trust application for the gaming site.

(07/21)

The tribe can submit another land-into-trust application for the site in Kansas.

(07/17)

State claims that tribal casino sites were not validly placed in trust.

(07/17)

The tribe says the Supreme Court decision in Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community puts an end to Oklahoma's case.

(07/16)

The hearing takes place August 6 as more parties attempt to join the lawsuit.

(07/14)

The town was a party to a land claim settlement that is at issue in the case.

(07/11)

The tribe paid $9.1 million to save the track from bankruptcy and now holds a lien on the property.

(07/10)

Group claims 34 new tribes could try to open casinos in California.

(07/09)

The tribe still plans to fight for the off-reservation casino in Kansas.

(07/09)

Tribe lacks federal recognition, magistrate determines.

(07/08)

Rival factions agree to a September 13 election that could finally settle their dispute.

(07/07)

The tribe acquired the site in connection with a land claim settlement.

(07/04)

The Gila River Indian Community and the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community hope Congress will stop the project.

(07/04)

Two Wampanoag tribes are trying to open casinos in their home state.

(07/03)

The state claims the tribe gave up its gaming rights under a land claim settlement.

(07/02)

Project remains in limbo due to litigation from another tribe and local opponents.

(07/02)

Rival faction seeks closure of facility as internal dispute continues.

(07/02)

The tribe wants to open a Class II facility on its reservation on the island of Martha's Vineyard.

(06/27)

Attorney Patrick Sullivan highlights the intense tribal interest in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California.

(06/26)

Tribe says disputed machine falls into the Class II category, outside of state control.

(06/25)

Temporary restraining order has been extended to July 8.

(06/25)

Tribe continues to offer poker games at its casino in Idaho.

(06/24)

Voters in Massachusetts will get their say on the state's gaming law this November.

(06/24)

Dispute finally hits The Washington Post and The New York Times.

(06/24)

Federal judge determines state jumped the gun by filing lawsuit.

(06/23)

State of Idaho might be forced to withdraw its lawsuit and proceed to binding arbitration.

(06/20)

The payments could increase if 76 people are removed from the rolls.

(06/19)

Disputed vice chairman welcomes intervention in hopes of resolving leadership dispute.

(06/18)

Rival factions of tribe welcome lawsuit in hopes of resolving ongoing dispute.

(06/17)

Aura Bogado interviews professor Matthew Fletcher about the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community.

(06/13)

Tribe must remove the games despite NIGC opinion stating they fall into Class II category.

(06/12)

A panel of 11 judges will rehear the case that tribes across the nation are watching.

Home | Arts & Entertainment | Business | Canada | Cobell Lawsuit | Education | Environment | Federal Recognition | Federal Register | Forum | Health | Humor | Indian Gaming | Indian Trust | Jack Abramoff Scandal | Jobs & Notices | Law | National | News | Opinion | Politics | Sports | Technology | World

Indianz.Com Terms of Service | Indianz.Com Privacy Policy
About Indianz.Com | Advertise on Indianz.Com

Indianz.Com is a product of Noble Savage Media, LLC and Ho-Chunk, Inc.